I think this is interesting - as we know his name wasn't on the Birth Certificate of his first child Daniel - and this quote from The Daily Telegraph tells us why:
It emerged earlier this year that the new Labour leader had been “too busy” to register himself as the father of his 18 month old son Daniel.
"He has admitted that it was the pressures of attending the Copenhagen climate change summit as the then energy secretary, as well as the forthcoming general election campaign, which distracted him from completing the form after Daniel’s birth."
I was under the impression that it take second to say the word "Milliband" when the Birth Certificate is being filled out. He managed all the other details at the time because the child has a Birth Certificate!
Maybe there was another reason why he would put his name on the certificate.
- Platinum Poster
Number of posts : 3418
Location : Freezing in England
Registration date : 2010-08-28
Sorry, but that is absolute bullshit. He was "too busy" to at least give his own child his name? It's like something off the Jeremy Kyle show.
That sounds very odd. When my children were born, I was able to register them at the hospital and I just gave their father's name and occupation, which were added to the short certificate I received at the time. The longer certificate just came in the post without my having to do anything else.
"You can run on for a long time, Run on for a long time, Run on for a long time, Sooner or later God'll cut you down." (Johnny Cash)
Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum