Missing Madeleine
Come join us...there's more inside you cannot see as a guest!

The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  Guest on Thu 7 Jul - 8:20

PETER OBORNE THURSDAY, 7TH JULY 2011

Let’s try a thought experiment. Let’s imagine that BP threw an extravagant party, with oysters and expensive champagne. Let’s imagine that Britain’s most senior politicians were there — including the Prime Minister and his chief spin doctor. And now let’s imagine that BP was the subject of two separate police investigations, that key BP executives had already been arrested, that further such arrests were likely, and that the chief executive was heavily implicated.

Let’s take this mental experiment a stage further: BP’s chief executive had refused to appear before a Commons enquiry, while MPs who sought to call the company to account were claiming to have been threatened. Meanwhile, BP was paying what looked like hush money to silence people it had wronged, thereby preventing embarrassing information entering the public domain.

And now let’s stretch probability way beyond breaking point. Imagine that the government was about to make a hugely controversial ruling on BP’s control over the domestic petroleum market. And that BP had a record of non-payment of British tax. The stench would be overwhelming. There would be outrage in the Sun and the Daily Mail — and rightly so — about Downing Street collusion with criminality. The Sunday Times would have conducted a fearless investigation, and the Times penned a pained leader. In parliament David Cameron would have been torn to shreds.



Instead, until this week there has been almost nothing, save for a lonely campaign by the Guardian. Because the company portrayed above is not BP, but News International, owner of the Times, the Sunday Times, the News of the World and the Sun, approximately one third of the domestic newspaper market. And last week, Jeremy Hunt ruled that Murdoch, who owns a 39 per cent stake in BSkyB, can now buy it outright (save for Sky’s news channel). This consolidates the Australian-born mogul as by far the most significant media magnate in this country, wielding vast political and commercial power.

Every summer Murdoch, now 80 years old, pays one of his rare visits to London, the social highlight of which is the annual News International party. An invitation carries the same weight, say insiders, as a royal command. In the phrase of one of his executives, to turn it down is a ‘statement of intent’.

At Murdoch’s side at last month’s bash at the Orangery in Holland Park was Rebekah Brooks, close friend of the prime minister and chief executive of News International. She was also editor of the News of the World in 2002, when Milly Dowler’s phone was apparently hacked by one of the private investigators hired by the newspaper. Mrs Brooks took effective personal charge of Murdoch himself, occasionally leaving her proprietor’s side to hurtle into the throng and recruit the most powerful guests for face-time with the boss. Later she joined Murdoch, News International editors and Gabby Bertin, David Cameron press secretary, for a private dinner.

Brooks is already at the heart of one investigation into News International, concerning payments to police officers. She is also deeply implicated in the second, the voicemail hacking scandal known as Operation Weeting. This is now understood to have 70 police officers devoted to it, making it the largest investigation in the Metropolitan Police’s modern history. Yet until recently, Brooks had maintained there was no illegal hacking before 2006.

This claim — like so many other News International claims — is now falling apart. Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator imprisoned for hacking that year, is now believed to have targeted Milly Dowler’s phone. This development is seismic. It suggests police could be sitting on an as-yet-unpublished list of victims over an extra four years of Mulcaire’s phone-hacking career.

So one point is beyond debate. News International’s leading profit centre, the News of the World, was dependent on a very ugly culture of lawbreaking, hacking and impunity. This freewheeling, ask-no-questions attitude spread to other parts of the organisation, such as the Times and the Sunday Times, both of which used have used illegal or unethical techniques. Even more troubling, when senior News International management were confronted with evidence of wrongdoing, the company made false statements and took actions which prevented key evidence from reaching the public domain.

All of this raises the question: what on earth were the British prime minister and his wife doing at the Orangery on that Thursday night? There are those who maintain that David Cameron is little more than a high-grade public relations man. Cameron’s long association with the Murdoch empire, dating from his dreadful decision to hire Andy Coulson — a former editor of the News of the World who resigned after a phone-hacking scandal, and now looks to be in even deeper trouble — unfortunately suggests that the prime minister’s detractors are on to something.

When still leader of the opposition, David Cameron came across the PR fixer Matthew Freud, son-in-law of Murdoch, at Rebekah Brooks’s wedding. The two men exchanged an exuberant high-five salute. To this day, the Prime Minister and his wife remain on cheerful social terms with Brooks, who lives barely a mile up the road from the their country home. They have been known to go riding together. All this is too depressing for words.

In normal circumstances, such troubling and persistent failures of prime-ministerial judgment would be meat and drink to an opposition leader. But until this week, Ed Miliband had made the pragmatic decision to ignore the phone-hacking story — explaining privately to confidants that he had no choice because the alternative would be ‘three years of hell’ at the hands of the Murdoch press. His recent, panicked call for Brooks’s resignation only serves to highlight his silence on the scandal hitherto.

I am told that he has agreed in principle to follow in the footsteps of both Tony Blair and David Cameron and fly round the world to address an annual conference of News International executives. Perhaps he will make his theme the restoration of public decency. In recent weeks Miliband has made a series of speeches about this subject, demanding ‘a greater sense of responsibility and national mission for our country’. Doubtless it was this urgent mission which took him, alongside his shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander, and his shadow chancellor Ed Balls, to the Murdoch party.

The truth is that Ed Miliband had made his choice very early with the appointment of Tom Baldwin, a former News International journalist, as his spin doctor. This mirrored David Cameron’s appointment of Coulson, another Murdoch high-flyer, to a similar role. For ten years, Baldwin was at the heart of a Times campaign to destroy Lord Ashcroft, the former Tory treasurer. As Ashcroft records in his book Dirty Politics, Dirty Times, illegal techniques were used, though not directly by Baldwin. A private investigator was used to ‘blag’ his way into the Conservative party bank account, while the Times paid £6,000 to a US Drugs Enforcement Agency official called Jonathan Randel for leaked information (the Times insisted the money was simply paid as a ‘research fee’). As a result Randel was sent to jail.

Perhaps Baldwin, like his former News International colleagues, doesn’t find phone hacking too shocking. Indeed, one of his first actions as Miliband’s spin-doctor was to instruct Labour MPs to go easy on the scandal. In a leaked memo, he ordered them not to link it to the impending takeover decision on BSkyB. But this was to let News International crucially off the hook. For the key question — and it burns deeper than ever in the light of the Milly Dowler revelations — is exactly whether the owner of News International is any longer a ‘fit and proper’ person to occupy such a dominant position in the British media.

This is a question that has almost never been asked. This is partly because of heavy political protection of the kind that was on such vivid display at the Orangery last month. But Murdoch could not have got away with it for so long but for the silence in the British press. The Sunday Mirror is the News of the World’s most direct competitor: one would have expected it to revel in its rival’s problems. Instead it has largely ignored the story — except for an attack on the News of the World on Wednesday — as has Express Newspapers.

The Daily Mail, likewise, has written almost nothing. Paul Dacre, editor-in-chief at Associated Newspapers, is rightly regarded as the greatest newspaper editor of his time. But in this case Fleet Street’s moralist has lost his compass: his failure to engage seriously with the phone-hacking story is a most unfortunate blot on a brilliant career. The Daily Telegraph, for which I write, has done better, but the minimum. Only the Guardian, and belatedly the Independent, have covered the story with flair and integrity.

This should have been one of the great stories of all time. It has almost everything — royalty, police corruption, Downing Street complicity, celebrities by the cartload, Fleet Street at its most evil and disgusting. One day, I guess, it will be turned into a brilliant film, and there will be a compulsive book as well.

The truth is that very few newspapers can declare themselves entirely innocent of buying illegal information from private detectives. A 2006 report by the Information Commissioner gave a snapshot into the affairs of one such ‘detective’, caught in so-called ‘Operation Motorman’. The commissioner’s report found that 305 journalists had been identified ‘as customers driving the illegal trade in confidential personal information’. It named each newspaper group, the number of offences and the number of guilty journalists (see above). But, as the commission observed, coverage of this scandal ‘even in the broadsheets, at the time of publication, was limited’. The same reticence has been seen, until now, over the voicemail-hacking scandal.

By minimising these stories, media groups are coming dangerously close to making a very significant statement: they are essentially part of the same bent system as News International and complicit in its criminality. At heart this is a story about the failure of the British system, which relies on a series of checks and balances to prevent high-level corruption. Each one of them has failed: parliament because MPs feel intimidated by the power of newspapers to expose and destroy them; and opposition, because Ed Miliband lacked the moral imagination to escape the News International mindset — until he was forced to confront it all by the sheer horror of the Milly Dowler episode.

That leaves the prime minister. He finally woke up to the kind of company he has been keeping on Tuesday when during his Afghanistan visit he declared the Milly Dowler revelations ‘truly dreadful’. David Cameron has repeatedly displayed an inability to make a distinction between right and wrong. The press ought to have stepped into the breach. Unfortunately, we in Fleet Street have forgotten that the ultimate vindication of journalism is not to intrude into, and destroy, private lives. Nor is it the dance around power, money and social status. It is the fight for truth and decency.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/print/essays/7075673/what-the-papers-wont-say.thtml
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  Guest on Thu 7 Jul - 8:55

@fieldproducer

Currently News International are investigating themselves,the Met Police are investigating themselves & the PCC are investigating themselves
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  malena stool on Thu 7 Jul - 9:02

There's more than an outside chance they will find themselves innocent of any untoward acts then........
avatar
malena stool
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Male
Number of posts : 13611
Location : Spare room above the kitchen
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-10-04

Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  Panda on Thu 7 Jul - 9:26



Excellent Article Carmen, thanks.

Maybe the fact that so many Companies are taking away their accounts from the NOTW will act more as a lesson to News International and all the Press who have refused to condemn this phone hacking. Btitain is in a sorry state morally and Cameron has once again proved he is a reactive Prime Minister, not proactive.
avatar
Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 60
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  Guest on Thu 7 Jul - 9:45

Panda wrote:

Excellent Article Carmen, thanks.

Maybe the fact that so many Companies are taking away their accounts from the NOTW will act more as a lesson to News International and all the Press who have refused to condemn this phone hacking. Btitain is in a sorry state morally and Cameron has once again proved he is a reactive Prime Minister, not proactive.

You're welcome, Panda
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  halfamo on Thu 7 Jul - 16:02

malena stool wrote:There's more than an outside chance they will find themselves innocent of any untoward acts then........

That,ll be exactly how it goes East Mids.
avatar
halfamo
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1905
Age : 71
Location : west Midlands UK
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

as above

Post  halfamo on Thu 7 Jul - 16:10

This is the problem with a too powerful media organisation when politicians of all parties feel they must cosy up to imo dubious media moguls.
avatar
halfamo
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1905
Age : 71
Location : west Midlands UK
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  buildersbum on Thu 7 Jul - 16:17

What I would like to know is what Rebecca Brookes has got on Cameron for him to want to snuggle (high fives and all) up to her and her husband at lavish parties thrown by the Brookes???

IMO if Cameron doesn't deal with this correctly and swiftly, he's finished

buildersbum
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1628
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-12-30

Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  Angelique on Thu 7 Jul - 16:19

carmen

Thank you for this article from Peter Osborne.

So much to read - will take me a while.

I watched Channel 4 News yesterday and they interviewed someone (can't remember who) anyway he said the enquiry into the hacking must be a criminal investigation and that there should not be a Public Enquiry. Because it would discuss in public what had been happening and any information discussed would hamper prosecution.
avatar
Angelique
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 3418
Location : Freezing in England
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-08-28

Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  Panda on Thu 7 Jul - 16:45



I think the most horrifying part in all this is that it went on for so long and if it wasn"t for the Celebrities . the Soham Family and Milly Dowling nothing would have been done. Just announced , last issue of News of the World this Sunday, smother the enquiry Murdoch, that"s the way to do it.
avatar
Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 60
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

as above

Post  halfamo on Thu 7 Jul - 16:49

The implications from this are so wide reaching we have,nt seen nothing yet.
avatar
halfamo
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1905
Age : 71
Location : west Midlands UK
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  Panda on Thu 7 Jul - 17:03

halfamo wrote:The implications from this are so wide reaching we have,nt seen nothing yet.

I think Ford had the Moral courage to be the first to withdraw it"s account and other big names followed suit. If Rupert Murdoch wins and is given the
go-ahead to buy the rest of bskyb shares there is no Justice in Britain. What about the hundreds of hardworking NOTW Staff who didn"t know what
was going on? I just hope the enquiry will still go ahead and that Murdoch hasn"t done this to avoid it.
avatar
Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 60
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

as above

Post  halfamo on Thu 7 Jul - 17:12

Panda wrote:
halfamo wrote:The implications from this are so wide reaching we have,nt seen nothing yet.

I think Ford had the Moral courage to be the first to withdraw it"s account and other big names followed suit. If Rupert Murdoch wins and is given the
go-ahead to buy the rest of bskyb shares there is no Justice in Britain. What about the hundreds of hardworking NOTW Staff who didn"t know what
was going on? I just hope the enquiry will still go ahead and that Murdoch hasn"t done this to avoid it.

Cynic that i am NOTW has been offered up as the sacrificial lamb for the prize of BSKYB:
avatar
halfamo
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1905
Age : 71
Location : west Midlands UK
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  Panda on Thu 7 Jul - 17:22

halfamo wrote:
Panda wrote:
halfamo wrote:The implications from this are so wide reaching we have,nt seen nothing yet.

I think Ford had the Moral courage to be the first to withdraw it"s account and other big names followed suit. If Rupert Murdoch wins and is given the
go-ahead to buy the rest of bskyb shares there is no Justice in Britain. What about the hundreds of hardworking NOTW Staff who didn"t know what
was going on? I just hope the enquiry will still go ahead and that Murdoch hasn"t done this to avoid it.

Cynic that i am NOTW has been offered up as the sacrificial lamb for the prize of BSKYB:
o,

I hope your"e wrong halfamo with all the bad publicity surely it has been proved that Murdoch must have been party to it. When the first guy went to Prison that should have been enough....just announced, Murdoch"s bid for the rest of bskyb shares is being contested by the public, I think he will lose.
avatar
Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 60
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

as above

Post  halfamo on Thu 7 Jul - 17:37

Its just been said that James Cameron is,nt a newspaper man like his father so yes i think he would use NOTW as a sacrifice .I feel sorry for the innocent people at the NOTW when the culprits hang on to the jobs.
avatar
halfamo
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1905
Age : 71
Location : west Midlands UK
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  Panda on Thu 7 Jul - 18:22



Ed Milliband has been on T.V. saying it is unfair that all the Staff must go but not Rebekah who has the ultimate responsibility together with the upper echelon. It has put David Cameron in a bind because he is a Friend of Rebekah, they live near each other and of course he employed Andy Coulson.

I would be very surprised if he was allowed to buy control of bskyb shares now, the public, the Celebrities who had their mobiles hacked won"t allow it.
A Father whose Son died in Afghanistan admitted his mobile was hacked.

This might just be the catalyst for the British Press to clean up their act and the CPP disbanded with a stronger regulatory Board to replace it.
avatar
Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 60
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: The omertà of Britain’s press and politicians on phone-hacking amounts to complicity in crime

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum