Taxpayer Funded Search For Madeleine McCann 5th February 2012

http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com/2012/02/05/the-taxpayer-funded-search-for-madeleine-mccann-continues/

Very interesting read indeed. Please delete or merge if posted already.

Thank you Karen, the comment at the bottom of the article is very interesting indeed!

Thanks Karen, a very good unbiased Report.

Yes, pretty good - although it isn't a Search, but a Review.


No point searching anyway - at least in the sense most people will think of it ie for a live mis-per.

Thanks Karen, its good to see that more and more people are expressing doubts about the McCanns. The Fund could well be their downfall, especially now people are finding out their donations are being used to pay to pay for expensive lawyers.

From the article:

"It does feel creepy to watch the McCanns turn their disappearance of their Madeleine into some sort of endless charity campaign. It’s just not normal. It goes well beyond the concept of grief stricken parents searching for their child."

The End Is Nigh wrote:Yes, pretty good - although it isn't a Search, but a Review.


No point searching anyway - at least in the sense most people will think of it ie for a live mis-per.

I"m still waiting to read that one Member has contacted the DE to ask for confirmation about the Article instead of us speculating, nobody wants to know though.!!!

Not sure DE Newsdesk would be able to comment on this stirringtroubleinternationally article

Comment

Incredible, isn't it! The abduction scenario is a total fabrication, a fairytale. There's never been a shred of evidence in support of it. And yet, as you say, they can sustain their role as celebrities thanks to powerful protection. If it's possible to find a way through the curtain, the solution is at hand. A study of the phone contacts and the creche records shows convincingly - strongly enough for the Scotland Yard team to spend a little effort in developing it - that behind the scam were an investment banker ex-Landsbanki, now Matrix, and a computer-games entrepreneur with office in Margaret Street in central London. Quite how and when they teamed up with McCann is for SY to find out. But it won't cost them another 2 million, and they won't need to waste time on dodgy Spanish private detectives, that's for sure!

That's a bit "left-field".

Have the linkages stated as fact by whoever posted that comment ever been mentioned on this Forum before, so I can refresh my obviously badly failing memory?

The End Is Nigh wrote:Not sure DE Newsdesk would be able to comment on this stirringtroubleinternationally article

Yes they would be obliged to confirm the authenticity of CM.s Statement . Just e-mail the Newsdesk, address the email FAO James Murray.

I think I must be incredibly thick today as I have read the article at the top of the Thread several times and can't find mention of any statement by CM or any reference to the DE?

I suspect I am missing something that is not overtly stated.

Is the article we are discussing here not totally independent of today's DE front-page ? It claims to be written by an Adam Lovejoy.

The End Is Nigh wrote:I think I must be incredibly thick today as I have read the article at the top of the Thread several times and can't find mention of any statement by CM or any reference to the DE?

I suspect I am missing something that is not overtly stated.

Is the article we are discussing here not totally independent of today's DE front-page ? It claims to be written by an Adam Lovejoy.

Yes....you ARE thick.....it's on the Sunday Express Thread Page 5



The McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell said they and their friends
would do everything to assist attempts to discover what happened to
Madeleine.

Yes, but what has the DE Thread got to do with the article in this Thread?

http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com/2012/02/05/the-taxpayer-funded-search-for-madeleine-mccann-continues/


The article here doesn't mention DE or CM so why would it help to ask DE anything about it?

Annabel wrote:Comment

Incredible, isn't it! The abduction scenario is a total fabrication, a fairytale. There's never been a shred of evidence in support of it. And yet, as you say, they can sustain their role as celebrities thanks to powerful protection. If it's possible to find a way through the curtain, the solution is at hand. A study of the phone contacts and the creche records shows convincingly - strongly enough for the Scotland Yard team to spend a little effort in developing it - that behind the scam were an investment banker ex-Landsbanki, now Matrix, and a computer-games entrepreneur with office in Margaret Street in central London. Quite how and when they teamed up with McCann is for SY to find out. But it won't cost them another 2 million, and they won't need to waste time on dodgy Spanish private detectives, that's for sure!

This comment I found interesting and thank you Annabelle for to highlight it. This could be someone who is stirring the pot but if not and they do have inside information I find it very interesting.

Jean-Luc wrote:

Annabel wrote:Comment

Incredible, isn't it! The abduction scenario is a total fabrication, a fairytale. There's never been a shred of evidence in support of it. And yet, as you say, they can sustain their role as celebrities thanks to powerful protection. If it's possible to find a way through the curtain, the solution is at hand. A study of the phone contacts and the creche records shows convincingly - strongly enough for the Scotland Yard team to spend a little effort in developing it - that behind the scam were an investment banker ex-Landsbanki, now Matrix, and a computer-games entrepreneur with office in Margaret Street in central London. Quite how and when they teamed up with McCann is for SY to find out. But it won't cost them another 2 million, and they won't need to waste time on dodgy Spanish private detectives, that's for sure!

This comment I found interesting and thank you Annabelle for to highlight it. This could be someone who is stirring the pot but if not and they do have inside information I find it very interesting.

That IS interesting. Not heard any of that before.