Book on Maddie tops the paperback charts

mossman wrote:I have not seen a single copy of the new book anywhere here. The first version was sold as paper back and had pride of place in stores such as Tesco. This time around there was none. I have looked each week whilst shopping. Definately not there. My local book store has a separate section for the top twenty best sellers. Up to last Thursday it was not in this section either.

As it stands at the moment, even if I wanted to go out today and buy a copy, I know of no store with it in stock here.

Not Born Yesterday wrote:Yes I do agree with you there Krisy22. Imagine the grief a sceptic would receive on a cesspit like JATYK2! It is good that anyone is welcome here providing they aren't abusive but it is hard to fathom out someone who never waivers in an opinion despite all the evidence which renders it impossible. That applies to any situation, not just this one.

As for the sales figures, I think it's too early to come to any conclusions yet.

kathybelle wrote:

kathybelle wrote:

Krisy22 wrote:Just like to say ... that Snowflake came here in the early days when we were all encouraged to voice our opinions on the case. Over at Sky we were treated dreadfully and it was so nice to come here and speak and play games with people of other opinions.IMO

Don't you think that it's a bit childish to play games with other's who have different opinions?

The internet is full of windup merchants who trawl the internet looking for forums, for no other reason than to have a laugh at those who are debating different topics. They must lead sad lives if this kind of behaviour is the only way they can get pleasure.

:hi:Krisy

I'm sorry I misunderstood your post, when you were saying it was nice to come on here and play games with people of other opinions, I thought you meant that people were coming on here, purely to make fun of peoples opinions and have a laugh at their expense.

By the way I wasn't making any slur on Snowflake, I might not agree with what she says, but she says it without malice. Unlike some of the McCann supporters on other forums.

Krisy22 wrote:

kathybelle wrote:

kathybelle wrote:

Krisy22 wrote:Just like to say ... that Snowflake came here in the early days when we were all encouraged to voice our opinions on the case. Over at Sky we were treated dreadfully and it was so nice to come here and speak and play games with people of other opinions.IMO

Don't you think that it's a bit childish to play games with other's who have different opinions?

The internet is full of windup merchants who trawl the internet looking for forums, for no other reason than to have a laugh at those who are debating different topics. They must lead sad lives if this kind of behaviour is the only way they can get pleasure.

:hi:Krisy

I'm sorry I misunderstood your post, when you were saying it was nice to come on here and play games with people of other opinions, I thought you meant that people were coming on here, purely to make fun of peoples opinions and have a laugh at their expense.

By the way I wasn't making any slur on Snowflake, I might not agree with what she says, but she says it without malice. Unlike some of the McCann supporters on other forums.

Oh bless you Kathybelle.

I am not suprised you misunderstood my post. You can see now why I leave all the posting to the wonderful clever posters we have on here.

Will go back to the "games threads" now.