Missing Madeleine
Come join us...there's more inside you cannot see as a guest!

Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Page 4 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Guest on Sat 9 Feb - 8:12

Morning Panda


Neither McCann nor Healy attended.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  tigger on Sat 9 Feb - 8:18

weissnicht wrote:
kitti wrote:So mike gunnell admits he was in it for the money.

Sod the truth.


Sod Madeleine.


Make as much money as you can.


A child has lost her life but what the hell...I can sell the story about a man that will go through bloody hell and may go to prison all because he seeks the truth ....but I'll get a big BIG pay packet....and I ain't got no conscience anyway.


Reminds me off Clarence Mitchell....'If she's dead, shes dead...but not by their hands'......


Birds off a feather .


mccanns are Carter Rucks clients, they have no idea if their clients are telling the truth, nor do they care.

mccanns are Clarence Mitchells clients, he has no idea if his clients are telling the truth, nor do he care.

It's business, money, contract... nothing more nothing less.

The real problem is that the McCanns are a lawyer's nightmare. The first instruction from any lawyer worth his salt is 'Shut up! Don't say another word until I say you can.
From day one the McCanns have had the 'foot in mouth' syndrome, despite the services of top lawyers and a seasoned PR man.
I'm very grateful for for that - otherwise it might all have worked fine and we'd not be here.

tigger
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1740
Age : 50
Location : The Hague
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2011-07-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  cass on Sat 9 Feb - 8:31

tigger i agree with this foot in mouth from the mccans and clarrie -- thing is there have been so many foot in gob times its hard for anyone to know whats what re all this -- its like let them sptout -- give them enough rope and all that -- jemmied shutters being the biggest

cass
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1652
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-05-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Panda on Sat 9 Feb - 8:47

The End Is Nigh wrote:Morning Panda


Neither McCann nor Healy attended.
Couldn't have been that confident of winning then could they TEIN.?

Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Guest on Sat 9 Feb - 8:54

Nothing to be read into it at all.

They weren't required as Witnesses, regardless of the merits or otherwise of the Case or what they expected to get from it.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Panda on Sat 9 Feb - 9:09

The End Is Nigh wrote:Nothing to be read into it at all.

They weren't required as Witnesses, regardless of the merits or otherwise of the Case or what they expected to get from it.
Well you know how they like to put themselves about , what a great opportunity that would have been to keep them in the public domain. Probaly a bit embarassed because they had to make a pre-trial statement that they did not want Tony to go to Jail.

Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Not Born Yesterday on Sat 9 Feb - 9:20

Lately they haven't been putting themselves about much at all, have they?

There is no doubt that Tony has broken the order but it is course a total disgrace that he was forced to have to sign it in the first place.

Tony is as far as I am aware the only private individual who has ever been singled out in this way, yet his remarks are no different to those expressed on forums all over the world.




Not Born Yesterday
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 6697
Age : 103
Location : Over the hills and far away
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2011-10-09

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Guest on Sat 9 Feb - 9:27

If the Case was supposed to be a demonstration of muscle and an attempt to quell debate, it seems to have backfired spectacularly thus far.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  almostgothic on Sat 9 Feb - 9:36

Not Born Yesterday wrote:Lately they haven't been putting themselves about much at all, have they?

There is no doubt that Tony has broken the order but it is course a total disgrace that he was forced to have to sign it in the first place.

Tony is as far as I am aware the only private individual who has ever been singled out in this way, yet his remarks are no different to those expressed on forums all over the world.
It makes no sense at all.
It's not just pretzel logic - it's the rabid logic of a completely mad person.
A mad person totally incapable of foreseeing the bigger picture and the consequences of such a red mist vendetta - for themselves and for others.

almostgothic
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 2945
Location : Lost in the barrio
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2011-03-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  cass on Sat 9 Feb - 9:37

morning all

they have been quiet of late but tbh i think that they have been told to do just this -- the review imo was set up to do just that -- the uk public got fed up of the nobodys looking -- o money in the pot headlines -- now we have sightings from everywhere other than the moon --they wanted to crush ga and tb -- over the last week omg there has been more people seeong whats what than ever before -- did they expect this -- i dont think so -- hence the u turn that they do not want to see tony go to jail -- its damage limitation -- oh they are damaged alright -- they will have to shu up and move on -- this circus is too big --i know there is talk about another bewwk but what can they say in this book that people will be interested in ? nothing -- it wouldnt suprise me if this book never appears -- i think they will move on -- move away for the twins sake i really do

cass
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1652
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-05-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Panda on Sat 9 Feb - 9:37

Not Born Yesterday wrote:Lately they haven't been putting themselves about much at all, have they?

There is no doubt that Tony has broken the order but it is course a total disgrace that he was forced to have to sign it in the first place.

Tony is as far as I am aware the only private individual who has ever been singled out in this way, yet his remarks are no different to those expressed on forums all over the world.




Morning NBY I would have thought that Tony, a retired Solicitor , not shy about letting his views be known , would have realised the implication of what he was doing. I think his Booklet being sold and distributed free to every MP distributing leaflets through letterboxes in Rothley is what singled him out.

Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Panda on Sat 9 Feb - 10:17

cass wrote:morning all

they have been quiet of late but tbh i think that they have been told to do just this -- the review imo was set up to do just that -- the uk public got fed up of the nobodys looking -- o money in the pot headlines -- now we have sightings from everywhere other than the moon --they wanted to crush ga and tb -- over the last week omg there has been more people seeong whats what than ever before -- did they expect this -- i dont think so -- hence the u turn that they do not want to see tony go to jail -- its damage limitation -- oh they are damaged alright -- they will have to shu up and move on -- this circus is too big --i know there is talk about another bewwk but what can they say in this book that people will be interested in ? nothing -- it wouldnt suprise me if this book never appears -- i think they will move on -- move away for the twins sake i really do
Morning cass, I think you are right , they have exhausted donations, sightings, pleas to the public to keep looking and in the Article I read Kate is writing this Book , her last, as endgame and it will focus more on her and Gerry, cough, cough.
A Portugese Member of another Blog said the Portugese Court had recently ruled a Man guilty of Murder even though they did not have the body. Their decision was made on evidence they had. He felt it was very important in the McCann case because there was the Dogs evidence, blood stains in 5a and no evidence of abduction. Maybe that is why the McCanns are looking for an out of Court settlement. so they don't have to travel to Portugal

Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Not Born Yesterday on Sat 9 Feb - 10:26

I certainly don't agree with some of the ways in which Tony has gone about publicising this case - and in case Snowflake pops up any time soon, the "Silent Night" spoof sounds absolutely dreadful, though I haven't actually heard it - but overall his attempts to alert the public to the fact that the McCanns' version of events and behaviour ever since stink to high heaven make him a hero in my view.

Off topic, is there anyone brave enough to access muratfan's Twitter account? I have heard that he posted personal information about someone on another forum and then apologised for doing so. While I can believe the first bit with no problem, I'll be flabbergasted if the second bit is true!

Not Born Yesterday
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 6697
Age : 103
Location : Over the hills and far away
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2011-10-09

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Angelina on Sat 9 Feb - 10:32

Not Born Yesterday wrote:I certainly don't agree with some of the ways in which Tony has gone about publicising this case - and in case Snowflake pops up any time soon, the "Silent Night" spoof sounds absolutely dreadful, though I haven't actually heard it - but overall his attempts to alert the public to the fact that the McCanns' version of events and behaviour ever since stink to high heaven make him a hero in my view.

Off topic, is there anyone brave enough to access muratfan's Twitter account? I have heard that he posted personal information about someone on another forum and then apologised for doing so. While I can believe the first bit with no problem, I'll be flabbergasted if the second bit is true!

I joined Twitter purely to read some of the links posted. Just had a look...what a load of sh*** It's just reminded me why I never bother to go there. Can't help you I'm afraid.

Angelina
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 2928
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2008-08-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Chris on Sat 9 Feb - 10:46

Not Born Yesterday wrote:I'll be flabbergasted if the second bit is true!

Just put on marigolds and had a quick peek. I guess having Anonymous involved might have something to do with it.

Chris
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1607
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  AnnaEsse on Sat 9 Feb - 10:48

Not Born Yesterday wrote:I certainly don't agree with some of the ways in which Tony has gone about publicising this case - and in case Snowflake pops up any time soon, the "Silent Night" spoof sounds absolutely dreadful, though I haven't actually heard it - but overall his attempts to alert the public to the fact that the McCanns' version of events and behaviour ever since stink to high heaven make him a hero in my view.

Off topic, is there anyone brave enough to access muratfan's Twitter account? I have heard that he posted personal information about someone on another forum and then apologised for doing so. While I can believe the first bit with no problem, I'll be flabbergasted if the second bit is true!

I think the apology was posted by someone with a slightly different Twitter user name. Instead of MuratFan, it was MuuratFan

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
"You can run on for a long time, Run on for a long time, Run on for a long time, Sooner or later God'll cut you down." (Johnny Cash)

AnnaEsse
Administrator
Administrator

Female
Number of posts : 18459
Age : 105
Location : Casa Nostra
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-09-23

http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  cass on Sat 9 Feb - 14:18

Not Born Yesterday wrote:I certainly don't agree with some of the ways in which Tony has gone about publicising this case - and in case Snowflake pops up any time soon, the "Silent Night" spoof sounds absolutely dreadful, though I haven't actually heard it - but overall his attempts to alert the public to the fact that the McCanns' version of events and behaviour ever since stink to high heaven make him a hero in my view.

Off topic, is there anyone brave enough to access muratfan's Twitter account? I have heard that he posted personal information about someone on another forum and then apologised for doing so. While I can believe the first bit with no problem, I'll be flabbergasted if the second bit is true!
talking of this murrat fan or whatever his name is -- it seems that hes been posting some posters pics up from fb -- thats a no no choose what side of the fence you are on -- im on a few fb pages but tbh thinking of leaving them -- fb is supposed to be for friends only to look at pics -- it seems not all these fb pages are closed

cass
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1652
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-05-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  ProfessorPlum on Sat 9 Feb - 14:29

I think you have to click something to make them private otherwise anyone can view them-not sure though.

ProfessorPlum
Rookie
Rookie

Female
Number of posts : 139
Age : 59
Location : The wild side of life.
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2011-02-28

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Panda on Sat 9 Feb - 15:09

I wouldn,t join any of them , it's all I can do to post on here and one Blog. Wasn't it facebook that had 250,000 members
passwords recently?

Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  cass on Sat 9 Feb - 15:46

panda im not sure tbh -- i have 2 one for man u stuff and friends i have known on maddy threads from 2007 --other i dont use anyway -- its just this copying stuff by murrat fan im a bit wary of --tbh i have no pics on mine anyway -- but its a shitty thing to do

cass
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1652
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-05-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Panda on Sat 9 Feb - 16:52

cass wrote:panda im not sure tbh -- i have 2 one for man u stuff and friends i have known on maddy threads from 2007 --other i dont use anyway -- its just this copying stuff by murrat fan im a bit wary of --tbh i have no pics on mine anyway -- but its a shitty thing to do
cass, I couldn't handle anything else that required any technical ability , I have to get someone to download my holiday photos from my camera.

The Facebook news I posted on the Daily News not very long ago .

Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  cass on Sat 9 Feb - 22:17

panda yep me too -- if i want anything doing other than just posting i have to ask for help

cass
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1652
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-05-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Updated = McCanns v Bennett

Post  Sponsored content Today at 12:27


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum