The BIG lie
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Re: The BIG lie
So theirs no Colomboma.
The mccanns have lied about it .
The question is....
Why have all the family gone along with this lie.
If the family know about the lie which they must do as they have been with Madeleine since the day she was born, then they must know the truth off what has happened to her.
Have they all turned their backs on Madeleine?
The mccanns have lied about it .
The question is....
Why have all the family gone along with this lie.
If the family know about the lie which they must do as they have been with Madeleine since the day she was born, then they must know the truth off what has happened to her.
Have they all turned their backs on Madeleine?
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Re: The BIG lie
Really don't see this series of images to be conclusive evidence that Madeleine didn't have a coloboma.
Wintabells- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1331
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-02-28
Re: The BIG lie
Blow them up and LOOK.
Their is NO defect.
Their is NO defect.
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Re: The BIG lie
No, there seems to be no trace whatsoever. These are interesting, especially considering Kate's recent admission that it was just a flek.
So early pictures without, later photos with, then it reverts to a fleck. Why ?
Is there anything that could cause a mark on the iris at Madeleine's age, not present at birth ? Was it something that occurred in the weeks/months leading up to her disappearance, then capitalised on by Gerry for money making, hence photoshopping it into all released images ?
Or, was it made up as an identifiable feature because it was never there, thus making sure the only sightings would be their fabricated ones ?
So early pictures without, later photos with, then it reverts to a fleck. Why ?
Is there anything that could cause a mark on the iris at Madeleine's age, not present at birth ? Was it something that occurred in the weeks/months leading up to her disappearance, then capitalised on by Gerry for money making, hence photoshopping it into all released images ?
Or, was it made up as an identifiable feature because it was never there, thus making sure the only sightings would be their fabricated ones ?
mossman- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1639
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-05-25
Re: The BIG lie
Sorry, even looking at the blown up one, it is blurry and she is looking downwards, so I would not be able to say for certain whether there is a defect there or not. Sometimes, the camera is kind and defects are not always visible, depending on how the shot was taken. Lets face it, we all have photos that make us look good depending on the angle and we all have photos that make us look bad, again depending on the angle, lighting etc.
LJC- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 2116
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-09-23
Re: The BIG lie
hang on doesn't it say on Madeleine's passport that she had a colomboma. im off to look at pj files.
tanszi- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 3124
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-09-10
Re: The BIG lie
There is only one image (as far as I can see) where it's possible to see her pupil and given that it's in completely the wrong place, I'd say someone's been messing about with photoshop.kitti wrote:Blow them up and LOOK.
Their is NO defect.
Wintabells- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1331
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-02-28
Re: The BIG lie
She didn't have it, the mccanns have said she didn't.
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Re: The BIG lie
The mccanns told the pj she had a 'fleck'...that's it.
She has a birthmark on her leg, why does that hardly get mentioned
She has a birthmark on her leg, why does that hardly get mentioned
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|