Missing Madeleine
Come join us...there's more inside you cannot see as a guest!

Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Page 3 of 12 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 10, 11, 12  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  kitti on Fri 4 Oct - 0:22

'suspects no more , now they have the police on their side'...sky news.


How come they are allowed to go through thousands off phone records yet they discount the mccanns phone records and emails.

kitti
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 13376
Age : 106
Location : London
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  kitti on Fri 4 Oct - 0:25

Well their you are.....a reconstruction off BEFORE Madeleine disappeared...


We will prob be looking at the days or before,she disappeared ....

kitti
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 13376
Age : 106
Location : London
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  tanszi on Fri 4 Oct - 0:31

I think the only side the Police should be on is that of Justice, and who is saying the police are on the side of the McCs....

tanszi
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 3098
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-09-10

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  kitti on Fri 4 Oct - 0:32

https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/q71/s720x720/1383352_1423017557917625_31316592_n.jpg

kitti
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 13376
Age : 106
Location : London
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  kitti on Fri 4 Oct - 0:35

tanszi wrote:I think the only side the Police should be on is that of Justice, and who is saying the police are on the side of the McCs....

It was on sky news, it also said that the mccanns , If I heard right, will be sitting side by side with SY and that's all they will need in the future.


So clarrie has outstayed his welcome and given the boot now they have
SY?

kitti
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 13376
Age : 106
Location : London
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  jeanmonroe on Fri 4 Oct - 3:12

kitti wrote:
tanszi wrote:I think the only side the Police should be on is that of Justice, and who is saying the police are on the side of the McCs....
It was on sky news, it also said that the mccanns , If I  heard right, will be sitting side by side with SY and that's all they will need in the future.


So clarrie has outstayed his welcome and given the boot now they  have
SY?
Yep!

And guess who the big cheese at SY is?

None other than Bernie Hogan Howe, FUNDRAISER-in-chief FOR the McCanns, selling young kids balloons for £1 a pop, for their personal Private PLC!

Theresa May, Home Secretary, £6 MILLION FUNDER-in-chief FOR the McCanns, appointed him.

jeanmonroe
Golden Poster
Golden Poster

Number of posts : 996
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2011-07-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  almostgothic on Fri 4 Oct - 8:53

kitti wrote:https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=170494636480756&set=gm.234118913411272&type=1&relevant_count=1&ref=nf



Just when mr amarals witnesses are going to be heard.....
Yes, the timing, as ever, is interesting.
So much happening all at once, so much info to assimilate. Surreal.

One must hope that synchronicity
Doesn't signify duplicity ......


(Well it is Friday - POETS day)

almostgothic
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 2945
Location : Lost in the barrio
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2011-03-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  LJC on Fri 4 Oct - 10:39

tanszi wrote:I think the only side the Police should be on is that of Justice, and who is saying the police are on the side of the McCs....
I agree.  For all we know SY have already gone through the McCann's phone records.  We do not know how this investigation is working do we?  All we have are the tit bits that come from the news and, I am sure, only selective information is released to the public.

So what if the McCanns are sitting alongside SY on Crimewatch?

Are we the Judge and Jury for the McCanns?

What I am after is the truth, that's all.  Many a programme has been made with families sitting alongside Police, only for the Police to arrest the family members afterwards.

We do not know what SY are up to, how far along the road their investigation reaches, who they have already eliminated and who they are yet to eliminate or investigate further.

We do not know the names of their 41 persons of interest.  We do not know if any of the other tapas friends are amongst those names.

As Manuel would say on Faulty Towers, "I know nothink"  And nor do we.

LJC
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 2116
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-09-23

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  wjk on Fri 4 Oct - 12:15

Thanks LJC!
Your post has cheered me up!  
You're right, we don't know anything and the fact the McC's are on Crimewatch means nothing at all.

wjk
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 7812
Age : 51
Location : Manchester
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-08-20

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  Guest on Fri 4 Oct - 12:24

Do the maths, people.

38 "persons of interest" plus "3 arguidos" = 41.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  LJC on Fri 4 Oct - 12:37

You are most welcome wjk  

LJC
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 2116
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-09-23

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  AnnaEsse on Fri 4 Oct - 12:46

Iris wrote:Do the maths, people.

38 "persons of interest" plus "3 arguidos" = 41.
Aha! Hopefully, you're right, Iris.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
"You can run on for a long time, Run on for a long time, Run on for a long time, Sooner or later God'll cut you down." (Johnny Cash)

AnnaEsse
Administrator
Administrator

Female
Number of posts : 18459
Age : 105
Location : Casa Nostra
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-09-23

http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  MaryB on Fri 4 Oct - 12:55

I like to think there is enough integrity and intelligence in the police force to get to the truth of this eventually, whatever that might be.  Otherwise we might as well all give up hoping for any kind of justice in this country.

MaryB
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1581
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-09-15

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  fred on Fri 4 Oct - 13:35

MaryB wrote:I like to think there is enough integrity and intelligence in the police force to get to the truth of this eventually, whatever that might be.  Otherwise we might as well all give up hoping for any kind of justice in this country.
I gabe up hope a long time ago!

fred
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 4843
Location : Dining in my back garden
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-08-25

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  almostgothic on Fri 4 Oct - 15:19

McCann v Gonçalo Amaral libel hearing witness Patricia Cameron

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2510.0

Many thanks!

almostgothic
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 2945
Location : Lost in the barrio
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2011-03-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  comperedna on Fri 4 Oct - 16:12

This is the bit where I almost feel that I'm losing the will to live. Is it being suggested that the McCanns, by 'dining' just a step away from their holiday apartment, and arranging regular trips back to check on the children, somehow managed to allow a stranger paedophile from a 'paedophile ring' to enter it, and take away a sleeping Madeleine, without waking her up, and go where? with whom? by what means? in what time gap? etc etc etc. MBM was the wrong age for almost all paedophiles. Why would such people risk taking a child from inside an apartment when parents and friends could be dotting back at any time?

comperedna
Golden Poster
Golden Poster

Number of posts : 855
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-08-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  MaryB on Fri 4 Oct - 16:16

Those type of child snatchers don't operate in holiday resorts.  It's just ridiculous.  Nobody taken in this way before or since.  You'd think since they would have tried again since they have appeared to have got away with their crime. But no they haven't.

MaryB
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1581
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-09-15

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  AnnaEsse on Fri 4 Oct - 16:18

comperedna wrote:This is the bit where I almost feel that I'm losing the will to live. Is it being suggested that the McCanns, by 'dining' just a step away from their holiday apartment, and arranging regular trips back to check on the children, somehow managed to allow a stranger paedophile from a 'paedophile ring' to enter it, and take away a sleeping Madeleine, without waking her up, and go where? with whom? by what means? in what time gap? etc etc etc. MBM was the wrong age for almost all paedophiles. Why would such people risk taking a child from inside an apartment when parents and friends could be dotting back at any time?
Paedophile rings also exist to make money. Why would anyone hang onto a child for whom millions was offered as a reward? That's a lot more than any paedo ring would make.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
"You can run on for a long time, Run on for a long time, Run on for a long time, Sooner or later God'll cut you down." (Johnny Cash)

AnnaEsse
Administrator
Administrator

Female
Number of posts : 18459
Age : 105
Location : Casa Nostra
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-09-23

http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  frencheuropean on Fri 4 Oct - 17:15

almostgothic wrote:McCann v Gonçalo Amaral libel hearing witness Patricia Cameron

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2510.0

Many thanks!
Hello almostgothic,

-well rehearsed for Patricia Cameron but she went too far at the end and the juge didn't appreciate when she said that according to Kate, the files and the book are very different.She dryly answered that it's to the court to compare them!:

"TC says she wishes to say something. She states that Kate studied the PJ files and the process and said it was very different from what is in the book.

SO protests and ID even more.

The Judge overrules saying that it falls to the Court to compare the book and the investigation process and she does not need the intervention of the witness to do so."

-P.C also say that it was her husband who found a translation of the book on the internet and gave it to Gerry. Very early apparently but no date given ( what a pity because the first translation was in spring 2009, so many month after the original was published. But they had it translated before or what was in the book was of no interest for them....or?):

"ID – Under what circumstances did you read the book?
TC says Gerry telephoned her asking for help and for her to come and stay with them.

ID – Had Gerry just been made aware of the book? Was it translated?
TC thinks he had a translated version

ID – Do you know who did the translation?
TC answers her husband found it on the internet."

-And we also know that 17000 British citizen asked the social services to investigate them for having neglegted their chidren and that has no relation with the book. ( january 2008)

"SO – You said the book had a big effect on the McCanns. Have you knowledge of a Petition containing some 17,000 signatures which originated in the UK in January 2008, which demanded that Social Services investigate the family about the children being left alone?

ID tries to protest against this question, but the Judge overrules.

TC says she heard about it.

SO – How did the McCanns react to that? In what state were they?
TC says they were unhappy.

SO – Do you know that 70% of the UK people, in August 2007, protested against the fact the McCanns had left their children alone?
TC answers "no".

- And a strange question of ID that could suggest that the parentsinvented the story:

"ID – When did the twins go to school for the first time?
TC – It was in August when they were 5 years old.

ID – Do they read and write easily?
TC answers "yes".

ID – Do they know of the book and its conclusions?
TC says that some pupils mentioned it at school. Last week Amelie told that somebody had spoken about it at school.

ID – Have you heard her say this?
TC says "no".
.

Goal!


frencheuropean
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1187
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-11-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  AnnaEsse on Fri 4 Oct - 17:25

frencheuropean wrote:
almostgothic wrote:McCann v Gonçalo Amaral libel hearing witness Patricia Cameron

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2510.0

Many thanks!
Hello almostgothic,

-well rehearsed for Patricia Cameron but she went too far at the end and the juge didn't appreciate when she said that according to Kate, the files and the book are very different.She dryly answered that it's to the court to compare them!:

"TC says she wishes to say something. She states that Kate studied the PJ files and the process and said it was very different from what is in the book.

SO protests and ID even more.

The Judge overrules saying that it falls to the Court to compare the book and the investigation process and she does not need the intervention of the witness to do so."

-P.C also say that it was her husband who found a translation of the book on the internet and gave it to Gerry. Very early apparently but no date given ( what a pity because the first translation was  in spring 2009, so many month after the original was published. But they had it translated before or what was in the book was of no interest for them....or?):

"ID – Under what circumstances did you read the book?
TC says Gerry telephoned her asking for help and for her to come and stay with them.

ID – Had Gerry just been made aware of the book? Was it translated?
TC thinks he had a translated version

ID – Do you know who did the translation?
TC answers her husband found it on the internet."

-And we also know that 17000 British citizen asked the social services to investigate them for having neglegted their chidren and that has no relation with the book. ( january 2008)

"SO – You said the book had a big effect on the McCanns. Have you knowledge of a Petition containing some 17,000 signatures which originated in the UK in January 2008, which demanded that Social Services investigate the family about the children being left alone?

ID tries to protest against this question, but the Judge overrules.

TC says she heard about it.

SO – How did the McCanns react to that? In what state were they?
TC says they were unhappy.

SO – Do you know that 70% of the UK people, in August 2007, protested against the fact the McCanns had left their children alone?
TC answers "no".

- And a strange question of ID that could suggest that the parentsinvented the story:

"ID – When did the twins go to school for the first time?
TC – It was in August when they were 5 years old.

ID – Do they read and write easily?
TC answers "yes".

ID – Do they know of the book and its conclusions?
TC says that some pupils mentioned it at school. Last week Amelie told that somebody had spoken about it at school.

ID – Have you heard her say this?
TC says "no".
.

Goal!

I'm sure the twins would have gone to school in the August when they were 4 because they would have started in the school year in which they would be 5.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
"You can run on for a long time, Run on for a long time, Run on for a long time, Sooner or later God'll cut you down." (Johnny Cash)

AnnaEsse
Administrator
Administrator

Female
Number of posts : 18459
Age : 105
Location : Casa Nostra
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-09-23

http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  Chris on Fri 4 Oct - 18:01

frencheuropean wrote:
almostgothic wrote:McCann v Gonçalo Amaral libel hearing witness Patricia Cameron

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2510.0

Many thanks!
Hello almostgothic,

-well rehearsed for Patricia Cameron but she went too far at the end and the juge didn't appreciate when she said that according to Kate, the files and the book are very different.She dryly answered that it's to the court to compare them!:

"TC says she wishes to say something. She states that Kate studied the PJ files and the process and said it was very different from what is in the book.

SO protests and ID even more.

The Judge overrules saying that it falls to the Court to compare the book and the investigation process and she does not need the intervention of the witness to do so."

-P.C also say that it was her husband who found a translation of the book on the internet and gave it to Gerry. Very early apparently but no date given ( what a pity because the first translation was  in spring 2009, so many month after the original was published. But they had it translated before or what was in the book was of no interest for them....or?):

"ID – Under what circumstances did you read the book?
TC says Gerry telephoned her asking for help and for her to come and stay with them.

ID – Had Gerry just been made aware of the book? Was it translated?
TC thinks he had a translated version

ID – Do you know who did the translation?
TC answers her husband found it on the internet."

-And we also know that 17000 British citizen asked the social services to investigate them for having neglegted their chidren and that has no relation with the book. ( january 2008)

"SO – You said the book had a big effect on the McCanns. Have you knowledge of a Petition containing some 17,000 signatures which originated in the UK in January 2008, which demanded that Social Services investigate the family about the children being left alone?

ID tries to protest against this question, but the Judge overrules.

TC says she heard about it.

SO – How did the McCanns react to that? In what state were they?
TC says they were unhappy.

SO – Do you know that 70% of the UK people, in August 2007, protested against the fact the McCanns had left their children alone?
TC answers "no".

- And a strange question of ID that could suggest that the parentsinvented the story:

"ID – When did the twins go to school for the first time?
TC – It was in August when they were 5 years old.

ID – Do they read and write easily?
TC answers "yes".

ID – Do they know of the book and its conclusions?
TC says that some pupils mentioned it at school. Last week Amelie told that somebody had spoken about it at school.

ID – Have you heard her say this?
TC says "no".
.

Goal!

I am surprised they haven't suggested the fact it was raised with a twin at school has nothing to do with the book itself but the lurid UK reporting of the witness evidence presented at the trial.

Chris
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 1607
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  Carolina on Fri 4 Oct - 18:10

I don't know if anyone else noticed but, at the end of Trish Cameron's testimony, the judge dismissed her with ;"A senhora pode ir à vida". This is IMO a rather rude way to dismiss someone, especially in a courtroom, and if anyone said that to me I would feel offended.

Carolina
Golden Poster
Golden Poster

Female
Number of posts : 874
Age : 70
Location : Algarve, Portugal
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-08-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  Angelina on Fri 4 Oct - 18:21

Carolina wrote:I don't know if anyone else noticed but, at the end of Trish Cameron's testimony, the judge dismissed her with ;"A senhora pode ir à vida". This is IMO a rather rude way to dismiss someone, especially in a courtroom, and if anyone said that to me I would feel offended.
Oh, is that Portuguese for P*** O**  

Angelina
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 2928
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2008-08-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  fuzeta on Fri 4 Oct - 18:27

Angelina wrote:
Carolina wrote:I don't know if anyone else noticed but, at the end of Trish Cameron's testimony, the judge dismissed her with ;"A senhora pode ir à vida". This is IMO a rather rude way to dismiss someone, especially in a courtroom, and if anyone said that to me I would feel offended.
Oh, is that Portuguese for P*** O**  
     Have a good time on your jollies Angelina, we are off on the 6th, can't wait

fuzeta
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 4182
Location : Beautiful Staffordshire
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2008-07-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  Angelina on Fri 4 Oct - 18:28

fuzeta wrote:
Angelina wrote:
Carolina wrote:I don't know if anyone else noticed but, at the end of Trish Cameron's testimony, the judge dismissed her with ;"A senhora pode ir à vida". This is IMO a rather rude way to dismiss someone, especially in a courtroom, and if anyone said that to me I would feel offended.
Oh, is that Portuguese for P*** O**  
      Have a good time on your jollies Angelina, we are off on the 6th, can't wait
Enjoy yours too....going to bed early, up at 3am tomorrow!!  

Angelina
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 2928
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2008-08-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Lisbon Libel Trial McCanns v Amaral

Post  Sponsored content Today at 12:11


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 12 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 10, 11, 12  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum