Re: Brits raise thousands for Maddie cop's libel appeal

interested Mon 5 Oct - 19:21

BINGO!!!! The total now is 50,005 - truly something to celebrate - well done everyone!!!!!

**kitti** Tue 6 Oct - 7:07

GoFundMe page 'mysteriously' disappears from Google search engine.

Now, being the sceptical person I am, is this a ploy to stop people donating to Mr AMARALS page.

Are the mccanns THAT scared off us?

**AnnaEsse** Wed 7 Oct - 20:48

kitti wrote:GoFundMe page 'mysteriously' disappears from Google search engine.

Now, being the sceptical person I am, is this a ploy to stop people donating to Mr AMARALS page.

Are the mccanns THAT scared off us?

I think the answer to that is yes. So much had been raised and then Mr Lawton gave the fund some great publicity, so the McCanns had to do something!

interested Sun 11 Oct - 20:20

I hope the Mark Souster controversy, which I've been reading about elsewhere, reflecting as it does on conflicting points of view, doesn't discourage people from continuing to donate to the Defence Fund for Mr. Amaral. (I've noticed the donations have not been coming in as steadily within the past couple of days.) Why can't people who profess to want justice for Madeleine in spite of their different theories, just unite instead of attacking others with crazy pot shots.

**pennylane** Mon 12 Oct - 9:39

interested wrote:I hope the Mark Souster controversy, which I've been reading about elsewhere, reflecting as it does on conflicting points of view, doesn't discourage people from continuing to donate to the Defence Fund for Mr. Amaral. (I've noticed the donations have not been coming in as steadily within the past couple of days.) Why can't people who profess to want justice for Madeleine in spite of their different theories, just unite instead of attacking others with crazy pot shots.

It's crazy isn't it? It's a complete waste of time and space, viciously badmouthing each other, and it plays right into the gruesome twosome's hands.

joyce1938 Mon 12 Oct - 15:53

Yes I too agree pennylane ,this frequent bickering is futile ,just ignore what you don't like to hear ,its just not interesting to follow up eh ? joyce1938

**pennylane** Mon 12 Oct - 16:42

joyce1938 wrote:Yes I too agree pennylane ,this frequent bickering is futile ,just ignore what you don't like to hear ,its just not interesting to follow up eh ? joyce1938

I personally think it's self defeating, and I suspect that when the viewing statistics are high on such threads, it's more likely our foes' rubbing their hands together with glee!

interested Mon 12 Oct - 16:45

joyce1938 wrote:Yes I too agree pennylane ,this frequent bickering is futile ,just ignore what you don't like to hear ,its just not interesting to follow up eh ? joyce1938

Yes "joyce1938" and "pennylane" I agree with each of you. These periodic disputes are embarrassing to those of us who want to get to the truth of what happened to cause Madeleine's death and the removal/disposal of her little body. Some of the debates that we are objecting to provide ammunition for the press and McCann supporters to further their slogan of "they are all nutters".

**pennylane** Mon 12 Oct - 16:48

interested wrote:
joyce1938 wrote:Yes I too agree pennylane ,this frequent bickering is futile ,just ignore what you don't like to hear ,its just not interesting to follow up eh ? joyce1938

Yes "joyce1938" and "pennylane" I agree with each of you. These periodic disputes are embarrassing to those of us who want to get to the truth of what happened to cause Madeleine's death and the removal/disposal of her little body. Some of the debates that we are objecting to provide ammunition for the press and McCann supporters to further their slogan of "they are all nutters".

spot on joyce and interested

Sponsored content