Why the Inquiry into Madeleine McCann's Disappearance has proved so frustrating

SUNDAY EXPRESS ARTICLE 3 APRIL 2016

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/657737/Inquiry-Madeleine-McCann-disappearance-frustrating-impossible

Seems the MET and SY arent on the same page



Sensationally, they announced that the famous sighting by Jane Tanner, a friend of the McCanns, near apartment 5A of the Ocean Club, where she was taken, was probably not significant as they believe he was on holiday and was simply returning to his holiday home with his own child. 



Someone requested an FOI and the MET stipulated that Crecheman was NEVER identified.

hello  seems the only person on the same page is Teresa May who willingly parts with another nearly £95,000 to search for a child now aged nearly 13 if alive (which I have reservations about) and who disappeared in another country.   even the parents aren't on the same page as the released PJ files show changes in their accounts.  why do we continually see a picture of a child in varying ages up to age 3 which bear little or now resemblance as to what she might look like now if alive.  ok so the age progressed piictures are out there but not as much as the appealing child photos.  also a bit concerned the only reference to funding for new private investigation is the money raised by the McCs book about maddies disappearance. (source The Sun today. nothing about the millions donated by joe public of many countries and what its been spent on.

I think the only credible facts known about this case is that Maddie disappeared in Portugal and the PJ files which show inconsistencies which have never really been explained.



Seems the Portugues people are calling for a release of the PJ files.  they should prove interesting reading.

I think that no one could have all the files publicly, as some evedence would not be able to be applied in court after that,hence Mr Amaral only had some in the public eye. I just wonder how many others there are ? joyce1938

yes Joyce I seem to remember there were allegedly several files held back by the PJ when the original release was made.

tanzi, thanks for your reply, its strange how some things not talked about much ,just sits in the memory eh ?its abit like i seem to have an inkling that the balls photo ,had been taken another time ,like after teatime she went back to the courts ,and picked up after adults played/? cant know where that came from really. joyce1938

kitti wrote:Seems the MET and SY arent on the same page



Sensationally, they announced that the famous sighting by Jane Tanner, a friend of the McCanns, near apartment 5A of the Ocean Club, where she was taken, was probably not significant as they believe he was on holiday and was simply returning to his holiday home with his own child. 



Someone requested an FOI and the MET stipulated that Crecheman was NEVER identified.

Yes, difficult to identify someone who probably didn't exist in the first place.