Missing Madeleine
Come join us...there's more inside you cannot see as a guest!

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Missing Madeleine
Come join us...there's more inside you cannot see as a guest!
Missing Madeleine
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10

2 posters

Go down

Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Empty Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10

Post  Lilemor Fri 5 Mar - 23:56

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2010/03/sinais-de-incendio.html

Sinais de Incêndio
5 March 2010 | Posted by astro Leave a Comment

Confirmaram-se as piores expectativas pressupostas no meu artigo anterior. A entrevista a Gonçalo Amaral em Sinais de Fogo foi um enxovalho ao jornalismo (SIC, 1/3). Sousa Tavares convidou o ex-investigador do caso Maddie para o humilhar, para verter sobre ele as suas próprias opiniões, para o calar. Não entrevistou, opinou, e se chegou a perguntar não deixou responder: era ele mesmo quem tinha muito para dizer.

Ao comportamento arrogante e antijornalístico, somou-se a falta de rigor no conhecimento, não só de detalhes, como de aspectos importantes do caso. O comportamento do jornalista foi ainda mais lamentável tendo em conta que Amaral estava judicialmente limitado na sua liberdade de expressão, pelo que não podia responder a questões levantadas pelo enfurecido Tavares nos seus comentários.


Eduardo Cintra Torres

Poor translation:

The study confirmed the worst expectations assumed in my previous article. The interview with Gonçalo Amaral Signs of Fire was a filthy journalism (SIC, 1 / 3). Sousa Tavares invited former investigator for the Maddie case humiliate, to pour it on their own opinions, to shut him up. He interviewed opined, and even asked not left to answer: it was he himself who had much to say.

By antijornalístico and arrogant behavior, added to lack of rigor in knowledge, not only details, as important aspects of the case. The behavior of the journalist was even more regrettable given that Amaral was legally limited in their freedom of speech, and therefore could not respond to questions raised by the enraged Tavares in your comments.


Eduardo Cintra Torres



AND


http://www.cmjornal.xl.pt/noticia.aspx? ... 0000000092

05 Março 2010 - 00h09
Sousa Tavares: Queixas na ERC
A Entidade Reguladora para a Comunicação (ERC) já recebeu três queixas contra a entrevista de Miguel Sousa Tavares a Gonçalo Amaral em ‘Sinais de Fogo’, SIC.

05 March 2010 - 00h09
Sousa Tavares: Complaints on ERC
The Regulatory Authority for Communication (ERC) has received three complaints against the interview Miguel Sousa Tavares to Gonçalo Amaral in 'Signs of Fire', SIC.
Lilemor
Lilemor
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1149
Location : Germany
Warning :
Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Left_bar_bleue0 / 1000 / 100Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Right_bar_bleue

Registration date : 2009-09-13

Back to top Go down

Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Empty Re: Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10

Post  Guest Sat 6 Mar - 1:32

Actually it was an interview of Miguel Sousa Tavares to Miguel Sousa Tavares.
We learned a lot about the personal opinions of MST, some of them based on wrong assumptions.
The bloody idiot didn't even know that Leonor Cipriano's appeal had already reviewed and denied.
Fortunately Gonçalo Amaral was there to inform him. Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 23324
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Empty Re: Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10

Post  Luz Sat 6 Mar - 4:17

You are so right, Estorilinho. That Sousa Tavares did a really sad job, not for Amaral that stood like a gentleman, but for himself (I feel sorry for his late parents).

_____________________________

Lovely to see you Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 83453
Luz
Luz
Elite Member
Elite Member

Number of posts : 389
Warning :
Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Left_bar_bleue0 / 1000 / 100Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Right_bar_bleue

Registration date : 2010-02-12

Back to top Go down

Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Empty Re: Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10

Post  Lilemor Sat 6 Mar - 9:07

06 Março 2010 - 00h30
Polémica: Amaral diz que Miguel “é amigo de Sócrates”
Sousa Tavares: “Que se lixem”
Os cidadãos anónimos que se lixem. Faço jornalismo há mais de 30 anos e não é anónimo. Era só o que faltava, que os cidadãos viessem agora controlar a forma como os jornalistas fazem jornalismo." É assim que Miguel Sousa Tavares reage às três queixas de cidadãos comuns que entraram no regulador dos media, sobre a entrevista a Gonçalo Amaral, a 1 de Março, no programa ‘Sinais de Fogo’ (SIC).


O ex-inspector da PJ garantiu ao CM: "Nenhuma das queixas é minha, mas sei que naquela noite o site da SIC encheu-se de comentários sobre a forma como ele conduziu a entrevista". E acrescenta: "Miguel Sousa Sousa Tavares esteve ao seu nível. Ele é um fazedor de opiniões e deu as suas. É pena que tenha chamado alguém para uma entrevista. Mas eu de jornalismo não percebo nada."

Comparando o estilo como foi orientada a sua entrevista com a do primeiro-ministro, Gonçalo Amaral é peremptório: "Toda a gente sabe que eles [José Sócrates e Sousa Tavares] são amigos. Portanto é normal. Ele não pode atacar um amigo. Mas ele não me atacou, o que fez foi dar a sua opinião."

Além das queixas que entraram no regulador, são muitas as críticas na blogosfera que apontam o modo discriminatório do entrevistador.

Sousa Tavares disse ao CM: "Podemos ser acusados por delitos de abuso de liberdade de imprensa, só faltava que a maneira de fazer jornalismo fosse alvo de queixas de cidadãos anónimos. Eu também me queixo: são cobardes".



Amaral says that Michael "is a friend of Socrates....

Please, translate the text via Google-translator or Promt for yourself.
It is unbelievable!!!


Controversy: Amaral says that Michael "is a friend of Socrates
Sousa Tavares: "f*** them"
The private citizens to f*** off
. I do journalism for over 30 years and is not anonymous. It was just what was needed, that people now come to control the way journalists do journalism. "That's Miguel Sousa Tavares respond to three complaints from ordinary citizens who entered the media regulator, on the interview with Gonçalo Amaral, 1 March, the program 'Signal Fire' (SIC).


The former PJ inspector assured the CM: "None of my complaints is, but I know that tonight the site of SIC was filled with comments about how he conducted the interview." He adds: "Miguel Sousa Tavares Sousa was at their level. He is a doer of views and gave his. It is unfortunate that someone has called for an interview. But I do not understand journalism thing."

Comparing the style-oriented as his interview with the Prime Minister, Gonçalo Amaral is peremptory: "Everyone knows they [José Sócrates e Sousa Tavares] are now friends. So it's normal. He can not attack a friend. But he attacked me, what he did was give his opinion. "

In addition to the complaints that came in the regulator, there are many criticisms in the blogosphere that point the interviewer in a discriminatory manner.

Sousa Tavares told the CM: "We can be accused for crimes of abuse of press freedom, all that remained was the way to do journalism was the target of complaints from private citizens. I also chin: they are cowards."
Lilemor
Lilemor
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1149
Location : Germany
Warning :
Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Left_bar_bleue0 / 1000 / 100Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Right_bar_bleue

Registration date : 2009-09-13

Back to top Go down

Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10 Empty Re: Regarding Interview Dr. Amaral - Tavares, 5.3.10

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum