Dumbfounded

Is it me,am I blind,but I can't see the transcripts on any of the pro sites.I want to ask if any of the pros have read the transcripts from the trial and what do they think.Have they been enlightened of what they have read from trickey,Hubbard and roach.Do they know if the mcs are confident on winning.?.Has anyone any clue as to what made brenryan see the light.?.Admin you can delete this if you need to,but as I said I am finding it strange that I can't find any comments on the witnesses for the mcs,but plenty on Amarals lawyer.

Well kudos to you for giving them credit but some would say 'Different day, same old sh*t'..... That's how it is on pro sites, they only exist to ridicule people who disagree with the mccann version of events and Snr.amaral.

You won't find any intelligent debate just hatred and bile.

Steve1295 Has Bren Ryan seen the light? Has she changed sides yet again?

Ah Margaret , that's the thing,if they could see,really see the mcs and their cronies for what they are,I would give them just the smallest smidgen of credit but they can't so I don't and that is what I am dumbfounded about.They will not ever say anything negative about them but will go hell for leather on folk that have A different opinion.As for Bren changing sides again,no no no she has not but I still wonder what the big insight was to have her go to the other side.Please Bren I really want to know,,do it for the mcs,they need all the help they can get,

Lily of the valley,,,,,,Bren has not changed sides again,,,,she would be cr again.

steve1295 wrote:Ah Margaret , that's the thing,if they could see,really see the mcs and their cronies for what they are,I would give them just the smallest smidgen of credit but they can't so I don't and that is what I am dumbfounded about.They will not ever say anything negative about them but will go hell for leather on folk that have A different opinion.As for Bren changing sides again,no no no she has not but I still wonder what the big insight was to have her go to the other side.Please Bren I really want to know,,do it for the mcs,they need all the help they can get,

I can't believe they're not talking about the case though! Can't be that sure of winning can they?

just imagine what Bren could tell us if SY ever pounce on the McCanns.....

They ain't Going to win that's why they are not talking about it.

steve1295 wrote:Is it me,am I blind,but I can't see the transcripts on any of the pro sites.I want to ask if any of the pros have read the transcripts from the trial and what do they think.Have they been enlightened of what they have read from trickey,Hubbard and roach.Do they know if the mcs are confident on winning.?.Has anyone any clue as to what made brenryan see the light.?.Admin you can delete this if you need to,but as I said I am finding it strange that I can't find any comments on the witnesses for the mcs,but plenty on Amarals lawyer.

Considering some are still adamant it was GA seeking settlement earlier this year when the M's own lawyers said otherwise why are you surprised.

It seems really strange that it was headline news on Sky, and in most of the papers and TV channels and then nothing. Why didn't they even report the case was postponed for a week. I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised if the case doesn't even go ahead Seems like they are not keen to report any of it after a start when it was being reported.

@chris,,I would love to be surprised,,sadly though it's not going to happen.

I do find it odd that the mccanns want an open court after last time?


Or do they just want an open court for the public to hear 'their side'.


Or have the mccanns got something up their sleeve like.....'there twins have suffered enough etc etc' and it will end there.

kitti wrote:I do find it odd that the mccanns want an open court after last time?


Or do they just want an open court for the public to  hear  'their side'.


Or have the mccanns got something up their sleeve like.....'there twins have suffered enough etc etc' and it will end there.

Or are there things that could be said in a closed court that the McCanns do not want to be heard in this case?

But mr amaral wanted a closed court and the mccanns didn't and got their way.


Surely the mccanns would off learnt their lesson from last time..'the dream'.


Is mr amaral going to say something that he doesnt really want to say and that's why he wants to preserve madeleines memory?


And he doesn't want to really hurt the twins by exposing this?

They want it in open court because they are hoping something will be said that they could later claim 'unfair trial' about.

It's all about preserving themselves, not Madeleine as their request simply shows.

It appears that they always do what's best for themselves. Nothing very much has changed in the six years they left their children in the apartment.