Have tweeting footie fans found Madeleine McCann?/Dailystar

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/13apr8/19of20.JPG

Panda, this sounds like the one you mention.

Not Born Yesterday wrote:http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/13apr8/19of20.JPG

Panda, this sounds like the one you mention.

Aren't you clever !! Thanks, that's the top but the photo I was thinking of Madeliene is leaning forward. Not to worry, as you can see , the snub nose and big eyes etc do bear a slight resemblance , but whoever peddled the idea the photo was Madeleine either needs to go to specsavers or it is a subliminal intent fostered by the McCanns to get more publicity LOL

The clapping hands don't go with the face. If they're that child's hands, then she could well be older than 5 or 6, although the hands look like those of an adult.

I can't see any defect in either of her eyes.

And it doesn't prove that people are 'still looking for her' - it proves that people are aware of what Madeleine looked like when she was *cough* abducted. 'Looking for her' is such a ridiculous expression. No-one is 'looking for her'. Just because someone who is missing can be found doesn't mean they're found by 'looking' - in fact most people who are not where they're meant to be are 'found' by accident, not by looking, so shut up McCanns.

and for this reason i really hope that sy or the pj make statements that they believe that they no longer think madeleine is alive , no she could be dead or alive , facts it is the holiday season just about and all this is going to start again sightings , there are some stupid people that think madeleine is still a little girl , close your eyes and imagine madeleine for a few seconds , i have and its the baby pic so much in our minds , no i think 7 years is enough , i hope that no other little girl has to go through her pic on the net ever

i really don't think it is relevant whether the image of the child is a still from sky or a photo, it should not have been put in the general media. I know damn well if an image of my child was taken and tweeted around the world and carried in other media I would be incandescent with rage. she isn't alone, she isn't abandoned whilst her parents go out on the lash she was with someone, so fgs stop all this hysteria around little blonde girls.

Wintabells wrote:The clapping hands don't go with the face. If they're that child's hands, then she could well be older than 5 or 6, although the hands look like those of an adult.

I can't see any defect in either of her eyes.

And it doesn't prove that people are 'still looking for her' - it proves that people are aware of what Madeleine looked like when she was *cough* abducted.  'Looking for her' is such a ridiculous expression. No-one is 'looking for her'. Just because someone who is missing can be found doesn't mean they're found by 'looking' - in fact most  people who are not where they're meant to be are 'found' by accident, not by looking, so shut up McCanns.

I think it was matthew said the photo was taken by someone from the T.V. , we would not have a good view of her eyes , and very obviously the girl in the photo is younger than Madeleie is now. Just how long that photo was on the T.V. while the person who took the photo from the T,V. had to rush to get their camera makes me wonder. Normally , photos taken at events are constantly moving , so the chances of this person taking a picture is a bit questionable. PS Matthew said the T.V. was on pause , can a live broadcast be paused?

I believe that a live broadcast can be paused Panda but don't ask me to explain how!

Not Born Yesterday wrote:I believe that a live broadcast can be paused Panda but don't ask me to explain how!

I wouldn't have a clue.......maybe some clever techie can tell us how  

I'm not a clever techie, haha, but yes. you can pause and also rewind during a live broadcast. That will be how someone managed to take this pic.

That picture resembles another pic we've seen before.....the face looks awfully familiar..

I can't believe what I have just read....what a load of complete shite. Another little girl is now plastered all over the world media.

Panda wrote:

Not Born Yesterday wrote:I believe that a live broadcast can be paused Panda but don't ask me to explain how!

I wouldn't have a clue.......maybe some clever techie can tell us how  

You press a button marked 'pause' on the remote control.   

tanszi wrote:i really don't think it is relevant whether the image of the child is a still from sky or a photo, it should not have been put in the general media.  I know damn well if an image of my child was taken and tweeted around the world and carried in other media I would be incandescent with rage.  she isn't alone, she isn't abandoned whilst her parents go out on the lash she was with someone, so fgs stop all this hysteria around little blonde girls.

well said tanszi!

Pic of Maddy-lookalike goes viral

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11256949

Thus enthuses the New Zealand Herald.
Like it was A Good Thing.
They just don't get it, do they?
And because they don't, this poor kid (who ISN'T Madeleine) gets the gawping treatment all over again.

It's just a story for THEM.
It's another invasion of privacy for HER.

A-Holes.

From OFM Facebook:

Thank you to all who have contacted us regarding the picture from the football game. The picture has been viewed by Gerry and Kate and it is not Madeleine.

It's comforting to know so many people care about Madeleine and are continuing to look for her. Thank YOU!

Please do not post the picture. We need to protect the privacy of the child in the picture.

~FM Webmaster


Read the last two sentences.
Now read them again.
No, your eyes are not deceiving you.

But it does beg the question ... what about all the countless little blonde girls who did NOT have their privacy protected during seven years of fake sightings? Do they not count for anything?
Or more to the point, what was the game changer that caused this sudden, curious outpouring of concern?

Do tell ......

May be they read our forum where we stressed that the fact that they say this girl could be Madeleine, in such circumstances, was highly suspicious!

Or maybe the girls dad has some legal knowledge ?

mccanns dont do dignity.

FIRST they say the picture has been sent to SY THEN they say isn't Madeleine.


It should off been.....it isn't Madeleine, the mark is in the WRONG eye AND...nothing because isn't Madeleine...


Don't they recognise their own daughter As they have to send it to SY first.

almostgothic wrote:From OFM Facebook:

Thank you to all who have contacted us regarding the picture from the football game. The picture has been viewed by Gerry and Kate and it is not Madeleine.

It's comforting to know so many people care about Madeleine and are continuing to look for her. Thank YOU!

Please do not post the picture. We need to protect the privacy of the child in the picture.

~FM Webmaster


Read the last two sentences.
Now read them again.
No, your eyes are not deceiving you.

But it does beg the question ... what about all the countless little blonde girls who did NOT have their privacy protected during seven years of fake sightings? Do they not count for anything?
Or more to the point, what was the game changer that caused this sudden, curious outpouring of concern?

Do tell ......

The wee girl's Dad got lawyered up?
ETA you beat me to it Lioned!