Stalker

I've got an internet stalker and the stalker is tinman, who made the You Tube video regarding Madeleine's abduction, that was posted on here and on another couple of forums. He has been trawling the internet looking for me and he found me. He has just been on You Tube and announced that I post as KathyBelle on another forum. He said he knew it was me, because I complained on here, that he'd banned me from posting comments about his video.

Tinman says, I'm a disgusting troll and I will very shortly be exposed for making sick accusations. He said I will end up with convictions and my photograph will be on the front page of the Sun.

At least I will make the front page and not page three, although with my figure I would make page three, four, five and six.

I should have watched my diet, then I would have been able to

but someone who hunts you down and makes threats towards you thinks he won't end up on the front page as an internet troll?

Do you feel suitably chastised kathybelle?

margaret wrote:but someone who hunts you down and makes threats towards you thinks he won't end up on the front page as an internet troll?

Do you feel suitably chastised kathybelle?

Of course I do Margaret.

Let us know what day you are front page news so we can all buy a copy!

oh dear!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is what it's all about, scarring the shit out off somebody who doesn't believe in their theory by threatening them with sun exposures.....

There is a recent precedent for Trolls (Real ones, like your Stalker) being officially identified, so if he/she/it remains troublesome, stand firm and turn the tables.

He should read today's news about internet trolls, it could be him that's on the front pages of newspapers very soon.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/websites-forced-identify-trolls-033754759.html

Websites Will Be Forced To Identify Trolls
Sky News – 3 hours ago
..

Websites will be legally obliged to provide victims with the identity of people who post abusive and defamatory online messages about them under plans by the Government.

Major reforms of the libel laws will also see internet service providers (ISPs) given greater protection from being sued if they help to identify so-called trolls.

Would-be claimants will have to show they have suffered serious harm to their reputations, or are likely to do so, before they can take a defamation case forward.

It comes after a mother who was targeted by online trolls won backing from the High Court to have her tormentors' identities disclosed.

Nicola Brookes faced "vicious and depraved" abuse on Facebook after she posted a comment supporting former X Factor contestant Frankie Cocozza when he left the show last year.


The Defamation Bill will be debated in the House of Commons later today.

Sky News political correspondent Glen Oglaza said the reforms have widespread support across the parties, so the Bill should make its progress through Parliament pretty quickly.

"What they're saying is, enough is enough of this cyber-bullying and abuse that's going on, on websites like Twitter and Facebook," he said.

"It's a difficult position because although in theory Facebook and Twitter are the publishers in a way that books and newspapers, and for that matter television companies are, they don't have the same amount of control over what appears and therefore, it's more difficult to prosecute them and sue them for libel because in some ways, they're not responsible."

The power to ask for anonymous identities to be revealed are intended to give individuals an avenue of redress should they be subject to defamatory comments online.

The idea is to enable people to approach 'offenders' and seek out-of-court settlements or other mediated resolutions.


But Scott Freeman, who set up the charity Cybersmile when his daughter became a victim of trolls, said these reforms do not go far enough.

"It needs to be a criminal offence, there needs to be legislation covering cyber-bullying. It's no good with civil lawsuits," he told Sky News.

"It needs to be addressed. It's one in three children now throughout the UK [who experience cyber-bullying], and it's affecting adults. It's terrible and civil lawsuits are not enough. They're unrealistic."

Justice Secretary Ken Clarke said the Government wants a libel regime for the internet that makes it possible for people to protect their reputations but also ensures that information online cannot be easily censored.

"As the law stands, individuals can be the subject of scurrilous rumour and allegation on the web with little meaningful remedy against the person responsible," he said.

"Website operators are in principle liable as publishers for everything that appears on their sites, even though the content is often determined by users.

"But most operators are not in a position to know whether the material posted is defamatory or not and very often - faced with a complaint - they will immediately remove material.


"Our proposed approach will mean that website operators have a defence against libel as long as they comply with a procedure to help identify the authors of allegedly defamatory material."

He added: "It will be very important to ensure that these measures do not inadvertently expose genuine whistleblowers, and we are committed to getting the detail right to minimise this risk."

Frank Zimmerman narrowly escaped jail when a judge suspended a 26-week prison sentence for two years after he sent a threatening email to Conservative MP Louise Mensch.

The 60-year-old posed as a member of online hacking group Anonymous and sent the mother-of-three an email telling her she would have to choose which one of her children would die.

In another case, 21-year-old student Liam Stacey, from Pontypridd in South Wales, was jailed for 56 days for mocking Bolton footballer Fabrice Muamba on Twitter after he collapsed with a heart attack.

The Bill will also replace the common law defences of justification and fair comment with new statutory defences of truth and honest opinion.

The so-called Reynolds defence of responsible journalism published in the public interest also gets statutory recognition, as responsible publication on a matter of public interest.

I think the people with most to worry about are those who trawl the fora and Twitter, looking for anything they can criticise with vile abuse of the posters themselves. Those who state opinion as fact and post libel about others should worry as well as those who blatantly post abusive comments about disabled people. I knew those screenshots would come in handy one of these days.

i too kept this very serious threat

Justiceforallkids wrote:i too kept this very serious threat

Good example.

i would call that a serious threat wouldnt you???

of course there is this too






and

Justiceforallkids wrote:i would call that a serious threat wouldnt you???

Sure looks like it.

I expect he is kicking himself for not ripping off clients for more than he did during his very brief career.

Oh dear! I smell the stink of libel there!

Good grief - I had no idea there were such sick people out there: I wonder what the normal people who still believe Healy & McCanns story for sincere reasons think of these morons?

The End Is Nigh wrote:Good grief - I had no idea there were such sick people out there: I wonder what the normal people who still believe Healy & McCanns story for sincere reasons think of these morons?

That's a good question. I think there are many sincere folks out there who believe the McCanns. Those sickos are not amongst the sincere.

another sick screenshot and yet now bren kisses their ass

The End Is Nigh wrote:Good grief - I had no idea there were such sick people out there: I wonder what the normal people who still believe Healy & McCanns story for sincere reasons think of these morons?

that threat from sabot about GA is worrying int it!!!

Justiceforallkids wrote:

The End Is Nigh wrote:Good grief - I had no idea there were such sick people out there: I wonder what the normal people who still believe Healy & McCanns story for sincere reasons think of these morons?

that threat from sabot about GA is worrying int it!!!

It is rather and perhaps it's a matter for the police.

annaeese rememebr this too they got shut down for liablity!!!

Justiceforallkids wrote:annaeese rememebr this too they got shut down for liablity!!!

And reappeared with a 2!

AnnaEsse wrote:

Justiceforallkids wrote:annaeese rememebr this too they got shut down for liablity!!!

And reappeared with a 2!

THERE IS THE SECOND FORUM.

If you go on the Jill Havern website (Forumotion) there is a moving line at the top of the home page, with lots of information on it. Goncalo Amaral says that if he disappears, his daughter and his friends will make sure justice is done.

The fact that someone killed his dog, may be the reason Dr Amaral thinks he could come to harm.

Here's a link to the J H home page.

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/