oh dear so gerry and kate dont want pictures of maddie sean and amelie on videos etc

Iris wrote:This wiouldn't be the same Kate and Gerry that used Bushra's picture, Mari Luz's picture, Yeremi's picture and the Swedish girl's picture with no permission, now would it.

Iris wrote:This wiouldn't be the same Kate and Gerry that used Bushra's picture, Mari Luz's picture, Yeremi's picture and the Swedish girl's picture with no permission, now would it.

malena stool wrote:

Iris wrote:This wiouldn't be the same Kate and Gerry that used Bushra's picture, Mari Luz's picture, Yeremi's picture and the Swedish girl's picture with no permission, now would it.

Good point Iris, yes it's the self same pair who strangely had not one iota of compunction about invading, exploiting and utilising the tragic events affecting other families for their own ends.

pennylane wrote:I'm afraid they don't get it.... and never will! They continue to be selfish, greedy hypocrites in spite of their past catastrophic behaviour which triggered a tsunami of dire consequences.

Narcissists through and through imo.

NoStone wrote:- and how about the other images the Mc's have latched on to??

- Jo Yates - http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/46feb11/SUN_01_02_2011.htm

- Claudia Lawrence http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23927098-kate-mccann-attends-vigil-for-missing-claudia-lawrence.do

- Jimmy Mizen - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1276595/Prince-Charles-joins-Mizens-McCanns-memorial-service-child-victims.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

How many others?? There should be a law that prevents the Mc's leeching onto other people's grief like the parasites they are!!

dutchclogs wrote:

NoStone wrote:- and how about the other images the Mc's have latched on to??

- Jo Yates - http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/46feb11/SUN_01_02_2011.htm

- Claudia Lawrence http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23927098-kate-mccann-attends-vigil-for-missing-claudia-lawrence.do

- Jimmy Mizen - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1276595/Prince-Charles-joins-Mizens-McCanns-memorial-service-child-victims.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

How many others?? There should be a law that prevents the Mc's leeching onto other people's grief like the parasites they are!!

Well said

Panda wrote:Who is going to be brave enough to question their dictatorial attitude when they themselves were quick enough to use every method available to get publicity for Madeleine and the Fund. Will any Newspaper call them to account for this latest attempt . No, it won"t be the Press, they withdrew the photo of the laughing McCanns. It won"t be Facebook who if they had any sense would close the McCanns account now on the grounds it is becoming too confrontational, so that leaves the Government and theyv"e got them in their pocket.

Madeleine is still a Ward of Court and therefore technically the McCanns are not her Guardians, but Justice Hogg kindly allowed them to receive LP Files , so even the Judiciary are in their pockets!!!

pennylane wrote:

Panda wrote:Who is going to be brave enough to question their dictatorial attitude when they themselves were quick enough to use every method available to get publicity for Madeleine and the Fund. Will any Newspaper call them to account for this latest attempt . No, it won"t be the Press, they withdrew the photo of the laughing McCanns. It won"t be Facebook who if they had any sense would close the McCanns account now on the grounds it is becoming too confrontational, so that leaves the Government and theyv"e got them in their pocket.

Madeleine is still a Ward of Court and therefore technically the McCanns are not her Guardians, but Justice Hogg kindly allowed them to receive LP Files , so even the Judiciary are in their pockets!!!

Morning Panda

I think you have summed this farce up completely. The establishment has got their seedy tentacles wrapped around everything, and have insured they are protected from every angle. It's a scary state of affairs.... and one feels no hope for the future, particularly where abused children and people high up are concerned!

Panda wrote:

pennylane wrote:

Panda wrote:Who is going to be brave enough to question their dictatorial attitude when they themselves were quick enough to use every method available to get publicity for Madeleine and the Fund. Will any Newspaper call them to account for this latest attempt . No, it won"t be the Press, they withdrew the photo of the laughing McCanns. It won"t be Facebook who if they had any sense would close the McCanns account now on the grounds it is becoming too confrontational, so that leaves the Government and theyv"e got them in their pocket.

Madeleine is still a Ward of Court and therefore technically the McCanns are not her Guardians, but Justice Hogg kindly allowed them to receive LP Files , so even the Judiciary are in their pockets!!!

Morning Panda

I think you have summed this farce up completely. The establishment has got their seedy tentacles wrapped around everything, and have insured they are protected from every angle. It's a scary state of affairs.... and one feels no hope for the future, particularly where abused children and people high up are concerned!

Morning pennylane,
I am not a member of Facebook, have no wish to be, but if I were I would make an official complaint. I read a while ago that Facebook were
hoping to take over from e-bay , which is in decline, because it has the advantage of Members being able to discuss bargains etc and be
more personal. It looks like the McCanns have yet again , they really are amazing, stifled any comment which is not complimentary just who
with the clout will tell them to go to hell?

Iv"e just been reading the transcript of the Oprah interview, she does ask some searching questions, aand Kate, two years down the line was still touting the Shutter theory, even though it had been discounted almost immediately.?????