Obama ordered to appear in court on Thursday to prove he is eligible to be president!

http://www.infowars.com/obamas-lawyers-outline-supoena-defense-for-court-appearance-this-week/

The countdown has officially begun. Barack Hussein Obama is due in court this Thursday, January 26, 2012 to be held accountable to the American people after nearly four years of dodging our demands for his long-form birth certificate.

And now, we know just how his lawyers are attempting to yet again get him out of proving his citizenship eligibility to be President of the United States…

“Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates,” Obama’s lawyer argued in a since rejected attempt to prevent Obama from appearing at the hearings beginning on Jan. 26.

“The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant,” Obama’s lawyer said.

You read that right, folks.

Obama’s dream-team of lawyers are arguing that, because of the electoral system, Barack Hussein Obama is not accountable to the American people.

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

If that’s not enough to get you in gear to defend America and get this elitist pig out of office, well, we’re just not sure what will.

On top of leaving the borders wide open, putting weapons into the hands of violent Mexican cartels, and refusing to deport illegal immigrants, of course), Barack Hussein Obama now considers himself above and beyond the ‘little people’, i.e. you and me. After all, we’re only here to do his bidding while he transforms America into an open-borders socialist state.

But we do not have to stand for this outrage against every single American. There is strength in numbers, and if for no other reason than sheer rage that a President would clearly make the argument that he is not accountable to us, we must act right now.

Per Article 3, section 1 of the Constitution, every inferior Court in the United States (i.e., every court except the Supreme Court) exists at the whim of Congress. According to Article 3, Congress has the unlimited authority to cause every Federal court in the country with the exception of the Supreme Court to cease to exist. And as declared in Article 3, Federal courts would have no jurisdiction to hear most cases absent express authorization from Congress which is why Obama’s billion dollar lawyers are wrong.

Through the separation of powers, Congress cannot subpoena Supreme Court Justices or the President, unfortunately. BUT Congress can make sure Barack Obama’s attempts to intimidate and wage legal warfare against the American people goes nowhere.

This isn’t the first time Obama has tried to dismiss the “birther” cause as beneath his notice, but you can bet he and his Washington cronies are gearing up for a legal battle like no other. In previous cases concerning Obama’s birth and citizenship, only certain documents were requested or discussed. But in his Jan. 3 subpoena, Judge Malihi requires that the President bring every document that serious eligibility experts have been discussing from the beginning. In the same supoena, Malihi ruled that Georgia state law is very clear – any candidate for federal or state office must meet the qualifications of that office and that Georgia electors have the right to challenge those qualifications in court.

Malihi flatly denied Obama’s motion to dismiss and scheduled a court date on January 26 to give Obama the opportunity to lay the issue of his birth and citizenship to rest once and for all. Reportedly, Judge Malihi has also subpoenaed Hawaii Health Department officials and commanded them to produce an original certified copy of Obama’s long form birth certificate… a document which the White House has failed to produce time and time again despite the demands of concerned American Citizens.

This issue doesn’t rest with just proving without a doubt that Barack Obama is a liar and a socialist imposter. Oh no, this case will open the largest can of worms Washington has ever seen, because whether he was born in Hawaii or not, it can be compellingly argued under law that according to binding precedents laid out by the Supreme Court, Barack Hussein Obama II does not qualify as a natural born Citizen.

We know. It sounds too good to be true. But it is nothing but the truth, unlike the hogwash tossed out by the White House to try and pacify us restless U.S. Citizens who are sick-and-tired of Washington’s manipulation with our borders and our economy.

A closer look at the U.S. Constitution shows a very clear requirement, in a unique usage and application of the term, that the president must be a “natural born Citizen” to be eligible for the nation’s highest office. And according to the Founding Fathers, a “Natural born Citizen” is distinct and different than “Citizen” and even “native born Citizen.”

By his own admission that his father was a Kenyan native and British subject, Barack Hussein Obama already does NOT meet the Constitutional standard of “natural born citizen” that was established by the 1875 unanimous Supreme Court ruling Minor v. Happersett. WHY? Because the Court decided very clearly in this case and in others that a “natural born Citizen” is one who is born on U.S. soil to U.S. citizen parents.

The future of our country will be determined just three short days from now, on Jan 23., when hearings have been schedules for three separate issues raised by Georgia residents who are challenging Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot – which they are allowed to do under state law.

They are demanding that Barack Hussein Obama II, unless he satisfactorily proves he is a natural born U.S. Citizen, be removed from the 2012 Presidential Ballots in Georgia.

Failure to appear on the Georgia ballot would cost Obama devastating media, and 15 electoral votes . But what if he lost them all?

That’s where you and I come in.

Obama needs every vote he can get in 2012 – if we can get just one state to remove his name from their ballots, he does not stand a chance. To do this, though, we need tens of thousands of messages overwhelming the offices of every single Secretary of State, since THEY are the ones who are ultimately responsible for determining who qualifies to be on the ballot – and, of course, who doesn’t!

It’s possible, but we need your help.

As our Founding Fathers intended, it is the States which protect us from all out tyranny. The federal election in 2012 and the constitutional eligibility of the candidates is no different. In the end, our states are responsible for ensuring the eligibility of candidates and our states will protect us from the tyranny of a Presidential usurper.

The state of Georgia is warning Barack Obama of the “peril” of simply ignoring today’s hearing on his eligibility to be on the 2012 presidential election ballot in the state

The hearing before an administration law judge is being streamed live, but Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, yesterday told the state he and his client would not participate.

The attorney told Secretary of State Brian Kemp that the issue already had been resolved and it wasn’t any of the state’s business anyway.

Kemp disagreed, explaining in a response that was posted online after hours last night that the case simply was “in keeping with Georgia law.”

“As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As the referring agency, the Secretary of State’s Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearings scheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, I do not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for [this] morning.”

He continued, “I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge.”

He also had a warning about the costs of simply not showing up for a court hearing.

“Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

The hearing could have a huge impact. It is the first time among the some five dozen different legal cases that have been filed over Obama’s eligibility that evidence actually is being heard in a courtroom. Being introduce today is the evidence about Obama’s background, his documentation, the results of investigations of private investigators and other information.

None of this heretofore has been put into an official court record, and judges earlier all had dismissed cases based on technicalities, such as “standing.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-warns-obama-of-peril-of-ignoring-eligibility-hearing/

Georgia citizens today delivered sworn testimony to a court that Barack Obama is slam-dunk disqualified from having his name on the 2012 presidential ballot in the state, because his father never was a U.S. citizen, which prevents him from qualifying as a “natural-born citizen” as the U.S. Constitution requires for a president.

The historic hearing was the first time that a court has accepted arguments on the merits of the controversy over Obama’s status. His critics say he never met the constitutional requirements to occupy the Oval Office, and the states and Congress failed in their obligations to make sure only a qualified president is inaugurated. His supporters, meanwhile, argue he won the 2008 election and therefore was “vetted” by America.

The hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings. In Georgia, a state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”

State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.

Citizens bringing the complaints include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by California attorney Orly Taitz, who has handled numerous cases concerning Obama’s eligibility; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield. Cody Judy is raising a challenge because he also wants to be on the ballot.

Several of the attorneys introduced passages from Obama’s own writings that Barack Obama Sr. was his father. They then introduced evidence that the man never was a U.S. citizen, that he was a citizen of Kenya at the time of junior’s birth and was therefore a subject of the United Kingdom...........

..............Taitz argued multiple prongs of the case: that the birth certificate released by the White House is a forgery; that he probably has had several citizenships, such as when he was listed in Indonesia as an Indonesian citizen; and that he’s been known under the names Obama, Soetoro and Soebarkah.

She also had a private investigator, Susan Daniels, testify that it appears Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number.

Documents and imaging expert Doug Vogt asserted the birth documentation released by the White House was a creation of a software program and not a scan of any original document. That would mean Obama’s documentation, despite what the White House released in April, is still under wraps.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-court-told-obama-slam-dunk-disqualified/

What an absolute mess from the most powerful country in the West. The USA and the presidents they pick are just a joke. Any fool can make it as it's all about money. Where Obama got his from I do not know but I could make a guess. Thank God we have a system where in our elections a cap is set on how much can be spent on an election. Long may it continue

fuzeta wrote:What an absolute mess from the most powerful country in the West. The USA and the presidents they pick are just a joke. Any fool can make it as it's all about money. Where Obamha got his from I do not know but I could make a guess. Thank God we have a system where in our elections a cap is set on how much can be spent on an election. Long may it continue

It's reckoned that Obama has over 1 billion available to fight for re-election. And guesses, good ones probably, could be made about where all that money is coming from. The judge in Georgia will make a decision, based on the evidence presented. Obama was told that the process was legal and refusal to participate was at his own 'peril.' Any person eligible to vote in Georgia has the 'standing,' to question a candidate. Some of them are now calling for Obama's impeachment.

AnnaEsse wrote:

fuzeta wrote:What an absolute mess from the most powerful country in the West. The USA and the presidents they pick are just a joke. Any fool can make it as it's all about money. Where Obamha got his from I do not know but I could make a guess. Thank God we have a system where in our elections a cap is set on how much can be spent on an election. Long may it continue

It's reckoned that Obama has over 1 billion available to fight for re-election. And guesses, good ones probably, could be made about where all that money is coming from. The judge in Georgia will make a decision, based on the evidence presented. Obama was told that the process was legal and refusal to participate was at his own 'peril.' Any person eligible to vote in Georgia has the 'standing,' to question a candidate. Some of them are now calling for Obama's impeachment.

I think we are thinking along the same lines Anna. The whole thing beggers belief!

fuzeta wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

fuzeta wrote:What an absolute mess from the most powerful country in the West. The USA and the presidents they pick are just a joke. Any fool can make it as it's all about money. Where Obamha got his from I do not know but I could make a guess. Thank God we have a system where in our elections a cap is set on how much can be spent on an election. Long may it continue

It's reckoned that Obama has over 1 billion available to fight for re-election. And guesses, good ones probably, could be made about where all that money is coming from. The judge in Georgia will make a decision, based on the evidence presented. Obama was told that the process was legal and refusal to participate was at his own 'peril.' Any person eligible to vote in Georgia has the 'standing,' to question a candidate. Some of them are now calling for Obama's impeachment.

I think we are thinking along the same lines Anna. The whole thing beggers belief!

If Obama is shown to be a fraud, every order he has signed will have no authority and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, every action taken under his orders will be criminal. We may be about to see the biggest scandal in US history. Who is Obama? On the day after his inauguration, he sealed all of his own records. All his college records, as well as his passport are sealed. He allegedly completed a Master's Degree at Columbia University, but no one there remembers him. You'd think there would be a rush of people telling stories about sitting next to him, playing basketball with him, but not a one! Odd?

AnnaEsse wrote:

fuzeta wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

fuzeta wrote:What an absolute mess from the most powerful country in the West. The USA and the presidents they pick are just a joke. Any fool can make it as it's all about money. Where Obamha got his from I do not know but I could make a guess. Thank God we have a system where in our elections a cap is set on how much can be spent on an election. Long may it continue

It's reckoned that Obama has over 1 billion available to fight for re-election. And guesses, good ones probably, could be made about where all that money is coming from. The judge in Georgia will make a decision, based on the evidence presented. Obama was told that the process was legal and refusal to participate was at his own 'peril.' Any person eligible to vote in Georgia has the 'standing,' to question a candidate. Some of them are now calling for Obama's impeachment.

I think we are thinking along the same lines Anna. The whole thing beggers belief!

If Obama is shown to be a fraud, every order he has signed will have no authority and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, every action taken under his orders will be criminal. We may be about to see the biggest scandal in US history. Who is Obama? On the day after his inauguration, he sealed all of his own records. All his college records, as well as his passport are sealed. He allegedly completed a Master's Degree at Columbia University, but no one there remembers him. You'd think there would be a rush of people telling stories about sitting next to him, playing basketball with him, but not a one! Odd?

Exactly. What an absolute cock up. I bet certain people are laughing their socks off at how stupid they all are.

Goodnight Anna

fuzeta wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

fuzeta wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

fuzeta wrote:What an absolute mess from the most powerful country in the West. The USA and the presidents they pick are just a joke. Any fool can make it as it's all about money. Where Obamha got his from I do not know but I could make a guess. Thank God we have a system where in our elections a cap is set on how much can be spent on an election. Long may it continue

It's reckoned that Obama has over 1 billion available to fight for re-election. And guesses, good ones probably, could be made about where all that money is coming from. The judge in Georgia will make a decision, based on the evidence presented. Obama was told that the process was legal and refusal to participate was at his own 'peril.' Any person eligible to vote in Georgia has the 'standing,' to question a candidate. Some of them are now calling for Obama's impeachment.

I think we are thinking along the same lines Anna. The whole thing beggers belief!

If Obama is shown to be a fraud, every order he has signed will have no authority and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, every action taken under his orders will be criminal. We may be about to see the biggest scandal in US history. Who is Obama? On the day after his inauguration, he sealed all of his own records. All his college records, as well as his passport are sealed. He allegedly completed a Master's Degree at Columbia University, but no one there remembers him. You'd think there would be a rush of people telling stories about sitting next to him, playing basketball with him, but not a one! Odd?

Exactly. What an absolute cock up. I bet certain people are laughing their socks off at how stupid they all are.

Goodnight Anna

Goodnight fuzeta.

Obama got elected because the US was ready for change and he had the right mantras. He never actually said what the 'change,' would be, or what the US could 'hope,' for, but a black guy running for president represented great change and great hope. The ordinary people of the US have been played for suckers and criticism of Obama's policies, and questions about his eligibility have been met with someone, somewhere, playing the racist card.

I hadn't even heard off Obama until he was made president.....he seemed to off came from knowhere.

kitti wrote:I hadn't even heard off Obama until he was made president.....he seemed to off came from knowhere.

I heard of him while he was running against Hillary for the candidacy because I used to listen to Radio 4 on the way to and from work. He had had a few years as a Senator, but that was all the experience he had in politics. His college records could be interesting because there are suggestions that he got funding as a foreign student. Those records were sealed by him. His Indonesian school records list his name as Barry Soetoro, religion Islam, nationality Indonesian. There are huge gaps in the information available about him: his passport details are sealed too. Never has there been so little information about an American president. Obama has spent over a million dollars not producing his documents.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-accused-of-disrespecting-court-state-americans/

This is a very long article, so I'll pick out the parts that I think are of major interest. Obama and his lawyer failed to turn up for the hearing in Georgia.

But those who observed a court hearing today in Atlanta say it could be the beginning of the end for the Obama campaign, because of the doubt that could surge like a tidal wave across the nation....

....The historic hearing was the first time that a court has accepted arguments on the merits of the controversy over Obama’s status. His critics say he never met the constitutional requirements to occupy the Oval Office, and the states and Congress failed in their obligations to make sure only a qualified president is inaugurated, while his supporters say he won the 2008 election and therefore was “vetted” by America.

In Georgia, the law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”

State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.....

......“That President Obama’s attorneys didn’t show respect for the court, the citizens, the secretary of state, and the statutes of Georgia reveals the true character of the administration as being completely and utterly against state’s rights,” Donofrio said. “The federal government is growing out of control with every administration and this action today is a loud announcement that this administration is going to do what it likes, and you can imagine that their response to this judiciary would be exactly the same if this had been the U.S. Supreme Court.”

He said if Georgia does decide to keep Obama off its state election ballots, he won’t appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, “because if he were to lose there, his entire administration would be void, including his appointments to the Supreme Court.”.......

.......“We had a legitimate hearing in a legitimate court where this private person, Barack Obama, was asked to come there and satisfy the basic Georgia election law ballot procedure, and he doesn’t show up. Nor does he send an attorney. We don’t see this on television yet, but I can’t imagine this not being major news. It boggles the mind that a sitting president who is running for re-election doesn’t show up at a state’s legitimately constituted proceeding to make sure that he is indeed eligible to be on the ballot,” he said....

........He said the election outcome also could be decided because of not being on a ballot in even one state. And he said there’s more to come.

“I can tell you from my own personal knowledge that there are challenges going on in other states. Van Irion has one in Arizona and one in Tennessee. We have one in Illinois that is has gone under the radar. We’re going to be filing similar challenges around the country. We’ll be filing one within a week and another right around the end of the month,” he said.

How I wish that George Bush Junior had been born outside of the United States!

P.S. Link added to one of literally hundreds of "I'm a buffoon but money buys everything" clips.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kz4uFYEwY7c

Not Born Yesterday wrote:How I wish that George Bush Junior had been born outside of the United States!

P.S. Link added to one of literally hundreds of "I'm a buffoon but money buys everything" clips.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kz4uFYEwY7c

Well NBY the majority of the presidents have been buffons. George Bush must have been on the whisky again in that one

Not Born Yesterday wrote:How I wish that George Bush Junior had been born outside of the United States!

P.S. Link added to one of literally hundreds of "I'm a buffoon but money buys everything" clips.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kz4uFYEwY7c

And as for Obama: "I can play hoops and golf and I'm good at reading off the Teleprompter. Look at the cushie job that money bought for me!"

I didn't until now know anything about President Obama's childhood in Indonesia. Here's a Daily Mail article about it. Barry is obviously an anglicised version of Barack and Soetoro was the surname of his stepfather. Confusingly his mother was called Stanley!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1258543/Meet-chubby-boy-curly-hair-New-photographs-Barack-Obamas-childhood-Indonesia-emerge.html

A very long article. This is an extract.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-eligibility-challenges-spread-to-6-states/

An administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obama’s name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.

But win, lose or draw, the fight isn’t going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obama’s own adopted political network in Illinois.

The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.

A default presumably would have meant a recommendation from the judge that Obama’s name be stricken from the ballot, a decision which would head for review immediately by Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp.

He, however, was the one who warned Obama of the “peril” of not participating in the hearing when Obama and his attorney had asked that the event be canceled.

Whatever the outcome in Georgia, the issue is gaining traction in other states, too, including Alabama, Tennessee, Arizona, New Hampshire, and even Illinois, Obama’s home political base.

There, in a complaint recently filed by Stephen F. Boulton of McCarthy Duffy LLP and Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, their client is asking for a change in state law to allow the vetting of political candidates.

Obama isn’t even mentioned by name, but don’t think for a minute that the requested change wouldn’t include his candidacy.

The plaintiff is Sharon Meroni, who long has fought inside the system for a way to challenge the candidacies there. In her new case, filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, she is petitioning for a judicial review of the state’s election procedures as they exist now.

Targeted are the state Board of Elections, members of the board, several county clerks and others, including candidates Dan Duffy and Amanda Howland.

Meroni, a registered voter in the 27th Legislative District in the state, said her concern is that “only candidates qualified for office under the Illinois and United States Constitutions appear on the ballot.”

The state’s primary is in March.