McCanns v Amaral

Navigator wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

Navigator wrote:

NoStone wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

I guess we'd just have to wait and see. Be patient. Go have a little lie down and calm those frazzled nerves of yours.

Try:- http://www.mysterynet.com/

So you think those who ask questions to get to the truth in this case are wrong to do so. What an interesting stance.

Are you really suggesting that there would not be a massive thread as I suggested? Or are you avoiding answering that question?

OK, we're all avoiding answering questions and no one is interested in getting to the truth.

Now, please go have a read of a few other threads and try contributing.

I am doing just that and seeing how much speculation is normal there. Funny its not accepted on this thread.

Of course it isn't. I've told you already, we don't answer questions! Now please go and play elsewhere.

AnnaEsse wrote:

Navigator wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

Navigator wrote:

NoStone wrote:

Try:- http://www.mysterynet.com/

So you think those who ask questions to get to the truth in this case are wrong to do so. What an interesting stance.

Are you really suggesting that there would not be a massive thread as I suggested? Or are you avoiding answering that question?

OK, we're all avoiding answering questions and no one is interested in getting to the truth.

Now, please go have a read of a few other threads and try contributing.

I am doing just that and seeing how much speculation is normal there. Funny its not accepted on this thread.

Of course it isn't. I've told you already, we don't answer questions! Now please go and play elsewhere.

And on the other thread you are suggesting that no poster should answer questions about what they post. How do you think that will ever allow the truth to be discovered? Or don't you really care about that?

Well now, I've just wasted ten minutes reading this afternoon's large number of Posts in this one single Thread and I am at a total loss as to what on earth it's about.

It starts with nothing, shuffles it about a bit, and ends up with nothing.

Rather like an unattended fire, it simply burns up a great deal of energy unnecessarily.

What on earth is the point of artificially generating speculation over a non-issue?

It must be more than a week now since a new Member appeared and just paddled around in the shallow end.

Fishing by troll.
I cannot for the life of me understand how a newbie can come on here and accuse anyone of 'not wanting to find the truth'. What else have we been doing for the last (almost) FIVE years?
Give it a rest Navigator. Go and read the whole forum, the police files, the rogatories, then watch all the interviews the good doctors have so kindly provided for us and then come back with something of substance.
That's a lot of homework so I expect we won't be hearing from you for at least a couple of days.
Why not start with the Rogatory interviews? They are well worth reading.

the slave wrote:Fishing by troll.
I cannot for the life of me understand how a newbie can come on here and accuse anyone of 'not wanting to find the truth'. What else have we been doing for the last (almost) FIVE years?
Give it a rest Navigator. Go and read the whole forum, the police files, the rogatories, then watch all the interviews the good doctors have so kindly provided for us and then come back with something of substance.
That's a lot of homework so I expect we won't be hearing from you for at least a couple of days.
Why not start with the Rogatory interviews? They are well worth reading.

It's gone, but I fully expect it to be back under yet another disguise soon enough.

It might have gone to put Gerry's tea on. Must be nearly home time for the world famous heart specialist. * snigger

TIEN - I think it was called making a mystery out of a mole-hill

AnnaEsse wrote:It's gone, but I fully expect it to be back under yet another disguise soon enough.

Oh, I do hope not AnnaEsse. I couldn't bear the stress of another troll coming here and trying to unearth the truth.

Palmeras16 wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:It's gone, but I fully expect it to be back under yet another disguise soon enough.

Oh, I do hope not AnnaEsse. I couldn't bear the stress of another troll coming here and trying to unearth the truth.

- or another mole digging for worms!!????

the slave wrote:It might have gone to put Gerry's tea on. Must be nearly home time for the world famous heart specialist. * snigger

Maybe there's something good on tele!

We were certanly splashing about in troubled waters again weren't we? I'm just worried that Sans_Souci / Johnny Watergate / Xavier / Platinum / Jodel will run out of new names and internet providers from which to entertain us.

Was the navigator wanting information to navigate back G&K

Palmeras16 wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:It's gone, but I fully expect it to be back under yet another disguise soon enough.

Oh, I do hope not AnnaEsse. I couldn't bear the stress of another troll coming here and trying to unearth the truth.

Damn! Now that I was finally ready to tell him the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth! Anyone knows where else the 'truth seeker' is posting so I can open my heart?

Navigator wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:

Navigator wrote:Lets say the shoe was on the other foot and Isabel Duarte had suddenly parted company with the McCanns this week.

Would that not be the cause for massive speculation here? Would you not be looking to find the actual answers as to why it happened and wanting them published as soon as possible?

Well thats all I am doing here now about the other equal partner in the case. And its even odder because we have somebody here who claims she knows the answers but wont tell people. How would that go down if the shoe was on the other foot?

That happened already. Rogério Alves stopped representing the McCanns. So?
I know very little, Navigator. You would be disappointed, really. But that doesn't mean that the very little I know I would share with you, does it? After all, I'm pretty sure anything I'd share with you, would end up in one of the cesspits in 30 seconds. In fact, that's a good idea. One of these days I might try it. But only when my imagination is running wild.

Are you saying Alves and Duarte switched places just days before a hearing?

And your reference to sharing with me is interesting. Am I the only person here on this forum? Or does keeping your secrets from other members not matter? Are they just not bothered?

Rogério Alves stopped representing the McCanns in a very precise moment. Seek and you will find.
I know you can't reply but I know you still read so no need to thank me.

Lillyofthevalley wrote:Was the navigator wanting information to navigate back G&K

Beware, he may come back as 'sat-nav'!

marxman wrote:

Lillyofthevalley wrote:Was the navigator wanting information to navigate back G&K

Beware, he may come back as 'sat-nav'!

or sans_everything!

Iris wrote:Kathy, that is exactly what happened to me on the herp forum. And two other people said the same thing. I spent ages composing a reply to somebody and I lost it all. I really do think it might be a Forumotion thing as that forum is run by them as well.

In fact I might just write everything in notepad then c&p it into a post, so if it vanishes I still have it.

It's always when you've written down your most profound thoughts isn't it ? I'm sure if I could retrieve my posts that have vanished into the ether, at least one of them would be worthy of a Purlitzer prize .

nospinnaker wrote:Am I the only one who fails completely to comprehend?

Nope

claudia is attracting a lot of interest and questions that she wont answer even if she knew, because thats what confidences are all about.

tanszi wrote:claudia is attracting a lot of interest and questions that she wont answer even if she knew, because thats what confidences are all about.

I've always had loads of fans, tanszi.
But yes, trust is very important to me. Even in the smallest things. And I'm proud to be trusted by those who matter to me. As I'm sure we all are.

Im sure you do have lots of fans Claudia, i have the utmost respect for those who keep confidences. tis the mark of a (wo)man.

tanszi wrote:Im sure you do have lots of fans Claudia, i have the utmost respect for those who keep confidences. tis the mark of a (wo)man.

You're very nice. I was just being ironic.
I can't stand betrayal so I don't do to others what I hate have done to me. It's as simple as that.

that so made me laugh.

tanszi wrote: that so made me laugh.