Give us a Clue Dave Edgar

For easy reference re discussion of individual suspects.

Top Row (left to right) - 1-10

Bottom Row (left to right - 11-20



So from this strange array of Abductor Suspects, could the McCanns PI Dave Edgar give us a clue which one of the above are we supposed to be looking for?

Excellent thank you Autumn - are Nos. 8 & 9 on the top row K&G?????

Bottom row, third from right is Barack Obama, isn't it?

Bottom row, fourth from left is Rebus (Ken Stott version)?

75% of them look like Gerry

If Dave Edgar is still on the payroll, funded by public donations, then is it too much to expect that he gives regular updates about his investigation is progressing?

If this wasn't so tragic it would be laughable. For goodness sakes after all this time and he can't even make up his mind whether its a male or female 'abductor' we are looking for! Perhaps he could give us an update re his search for Madeleine in the lawless hills around around Praia da Luz. Why are the McCanns happy to have this man head up their investigation .......you would have thought after that article revealing his non search re Victoria Beckham in Barcelona in the Daily Mail he would have been more forth-coming about how the search is going.

So why did Madeleine McCann detectives ask so few questions after major breakthrough?

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1206842/Why-did-Madeleine-McCann-detectives-ask-questions.html#ixzz1lXjLJllZ

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1206842/Why-did-Madeleine-McCann-detectives-ask-questions.html


Lets face it, after that damning article any parent paying him to look for their child would have given him his marching orders immediately. So why is he still 'working' for them and what has he uncovered in his investigations to date?

I'm convinced it was egg man who did it




I wonder how much Edgar is being paid.

Autumn wrote:



So from this strange array of Abductor Suspects, could the McCanns PI Dave Edgar give us a clue which one of the above are we supposed to be looking for?

Well, I can spot, Gerry (more than once,in fact several times), Russell, and Payne (more than once)
And Possibly Kate.

This made me wonder if SY will want to see all Dave Edgar`s files - there must be hundreds of them after doing all this investigating for so many years.

You certainly wouldn't want to meet most of these on a dark night. I'm not sure if top row 2nd left is even human and bottom row 5th left looks like a demented cabbage patch doll.

What about the clue Egdar gave about a House not far from PDL...no more was heard of that. In fact, Edgar has been on the Fund Payroll over two years
and the Barcelona story was because the supposed Witness came forward TWO YEARS after the incident. His Partner retired a while ago through ill health
but supposedly said "I will never reveal what I know"...that's if you believe the Press.

Why would the Fund appoint Kennedy to find suitable Investigators when they had so much help from Government who could have advised them. The
only Investigators Kennedy employed because he held the contracts were . Metodo 3, experience, Money Laundering and Fraud, Halligen, money
laundering and Fraud. Alpha investigations ex Detectives based in Britain with no experience of tracing missing children.

If all of the alleged sightings of Madleine were proof that Madeleine was alive, as claimed by Clarry, then wouldn't the complete lack of sightings be proof that she is now dead? Sorry Clarry, you can't have it both ways. There seems to have been nothing new coming out of this private investigation for well over a year now, so what is the fund truly being spent on?

jinvta wrote:If all of the alleged sightings of Madleine were proof that Madeleine was alive, as claimed by Clarry, then wouldn't the complete lack of sightings be proof that she is now dead? Sorry Clarry, you can't have it both ways. There seems to have been nothing new coming out of this private investigation for well over a year now, so what is the fund truly being spent on?

The first one is good as it could be one off 20million men in THIS country ...ones with hair off course unless he wore a wig....be prepared for 19million plus more sightings.



No. 7 is Gerry himself.


No. 16 is oldfield....and off course Edgar has thrown a pic off himself in there...no. 18......just to confuse us all

And Martin brunt, himself, has popped in at no. 14.

Can anyone see a Clarrie amongst them?!

HiDeHo wrote:

Spooky! Do we know which day that photo was taken Hideho?

This was one of the 3 'hidden' sightings - according to Gerry's powerpoint presentation in support of Gail Cooper's Monsterman 'sighting' , it proves the McCanns knew about the 12 year old girl's 'sighting' by 16th Jan 208 and it had not, as they claimed, been found by their new PI's hidden in the files.


Gerry McCann's Action Plan which he sent to Stuart Prior LP - 16th Jan 2008

contrary wrote:Can anyone see a Clarrie amongst them?!

Yes the very first one....

When you lie 24/7 for a living, you become soulless!

Remember when Gerry visited the toilet on one of his 'checks', well funnily enough there was a 'sighting' of Clarence at the time which may explain why he was in there for so long.

SY really do need to haul these two in for questioning. Here they are at one of their pretendy police conferences.

Autumn wrote: Remember when Gerry visited the toilet on one of his 'checks', well funnily enough there was a 'sighting' of Clarence at the time which may explain why he was in there for so long.

That photo reminds me a bit of George Bush Junior who also was full to the brim with excrement, to put it politely!

Not Born Yesterday wrote:You certainly wouldn't want to meet most of these on a dark night. I'm not sure if top row 2nd left is even human and bottom row 5th left looks like a demented cabbage patch doll.

He's my particular favourite

Were the twins let loose with their crayons at the police station?????

Autumn wrote:

HiDeHo wrote:

Spooky! Do we know which day that photo was taken Hideho?

At least this one is wearing glasses!

Just out of interest, which British nanny claimed to have seen this unforgettable creature?