maddies new image aged 9

sorry for another topic but imo this needed its own imo that does not look like a 9 year old much more a teenager imo

Justiceforallkids wrote:sorry for another topic but imo this needed its own imo that does not look like a 9 year old much more a teenager imo

Funny you should say that, my god this girl looks just like somebody I know and that girl is 13. And before anyone asks, I have known the girl and her parents since her birth !!

so you understand what i mean? imo that dpes not lok likea 9 year old it looks likea pree teen as you say 13

Justiceforallkids wrote:so you understand what i mean? imo that dpes not lok likea 9 year old it looks likea pree teen as you say 13

I agree with you, yes.

Hang on SY. I thought that kate said there is no coloboma, just a tiny fleck. This picture must be wrong then. Still trying to generate false sightings.

Was going to say the same as mossman and justice, some of my friends children are 8 and 9 and they look younger than this child who seems to be 12, 13?

Maddie would be a beautiful little girl though.

margaret wrote:Was going to say the same as mossman and justice, some of my friends children are 8 and 9 and they look younger than this child who seems to be 12, 13?

Maddie would be a beautiful little girl though.

This is a dead ringer for my own daughter (apart from the fair hair) who is 15. If my girl had fair hair instead of dark auburn, we would be getting stopped and harassed! It's really quite a scary prospect!

http://www.findmadeleine.com/campaigns/age_progression.html

I see the latest image is on the Find Madeleine website.

Pity someone has typed both police phone numbers incorrectly. I'm sure that wasn't done on purpose.

Are the t shirts going to have the new updated image on them?

Madeleine looks like she's in a school sweatshirt in that image. How many year 6/7 (the age she looks) are going to be accosted?

AnnaEsse wrote:Madeleine looks like she's in a school sweatshirt in that image. How many year 6/7 (the age she looks) are going to be accosted?

anna i was thinking the same thing this afternoon .

cass wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:Madeleine looks like she's in a school sweatshirt in that image. How many year 6/7 (the age she looks) are going to be accosted?

anna i was thinking the same thing this afternoon .

It seems that they have made that look like a school photo. So many schools in the UK have blue uniform sweatshirts like that. Will people be eying up girls coming out of schools?

This is interesting a post taken from HLM


Anonymous

25/04/2012 at 11:03 am


Where did this image emerge? Did the MET really commission it? Did they release it and if so on whose behalf and who gave it to them? It is copyrighted by Teri Blythe who worked for the missing person charity the Mcs did a charity run for and I think Patricia Mccann is/was involved with this chartry too.

The beer boy in Nerja saw this girl? Oh yes….I can see how one would immediately recognise Maddie from her aged 2 year old photo. I do have to say it is a far better likeness than the sugary US version of how she would look today (had she lived).


So......it looks like the McCanns are using the Press yet again.!!!

mossman wrote:

Justiceforallkids wrote:so you understand what i mean? imo that dpes not lok likea 9 year old it looks likea pree teen as you say 13

I agree with you, yes.

Me too

Give that girl dark curly hair, and it's almost a photo of my eldest, who is nearly 16!

curious george wrote:http://www.findmadeleine.com/campaigns/age_progression.html

I see the latest image is on the Find Madeleine website.

Pity someone has typed both police phone numbers incorrectly. I'm sure that wasn't done on purpose.

I have checked this morning and the telephone numbers for the Operation Grange team are still incorrect on the Find Madeleine website.

Notice they are saying it was commissioned by the Met....it wasn,t it was commissioned by the McCanns. Lost no time puvblishing details of their new book available 12th May.

Madeleine: by Kate McCann



Audiobook






Australia:

Publisher: Random House
16th May, 2011


Brazil:
Publisher: Editora Prumo
6th September, 2011


Canada:
Publisher: Random House
16th May, 2011


Germany
Publisher: Bastei Lübbe
16th September, 2011


Hungary
Publisher: Scolar
27th October, 2011


Netherlands
Publisher: De Boekerij
20th June, 2011


Portugal
Publisher: ASA LEYA
23rd May, 2011


Spain
Publisher: Ediciones Singular (Medialive Content)
19th October, 2011


Sweden
Publisher: Norstedts
Early March 2012


United States
Publisher: Random House
16th May, 2011


UK, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand Store Availability:
The book is available from Thursday, 12th of May - wherever books are sold.

The hardback is in every major supermarket that stocks books, from Thursday, 12th of May, as well as in all branches of Waterstone's, WHSmith (High Street branches and Travel outlets - airports in trade paperback/hardback at major stations) and the independent sector.


Online Availability:

Available as a hardback and in eBook format.
Amazon.co.uk
Tesco.com
WHSmith.co.uk
Waterstones.co.uk
Random House Consumer Site
The Book Depository



Mainland Europe Availability:

Sold in outlets that stock English language books.


North America Availability:

Available as a hardback and in eBook format from Thursday, 12th of May. Available for pre-order on Monday, 9th of May.
Amazon.com
BarnesandNoble.com
Chapters Indigo (in Canada)

curious george wrote:

curious george wrote:http://www.findmadeleine.com/campaigns/age_progression.html

I see the latest image is on the Find Madeleine website.

Pity someone has typed both police phone numbers incorrectly. I'm sure that wasn't done on purpose.

I have checked this morning and the telephone numbers for the Operation Grange team are still incorrect on the Find Madeleine website.

The site has probalbly had large amount of traffic after the latest coverage...that is an unbelievable error(cough) on their part

"To type one number incorrectly may be regarded as error, to type two seems like blatant misrepresentation."
Lady Almost-Bracknell (cough)

almostgothic wrote:"To type one number incorrectly may be regarded as error, to type two seems like blatant misrepresentation."
Lady Almost-Bracknell (cough)

Could it be that someone doesn't want too many people contacting the police? "I got in touch with the official Find Madeleine site, but no one interviewed me," kind of thing?

AnnaEsse wrote:

almostgothic wrote:"To type one number incorrectly may be regarded as error, to type two seems like blatant misrepresentation."
Lady Almost-Bracknell (cough)

Could it be that someone doesn't want too many people contacting the police? "I got in touch with the official Find Madeleine site, but no one interviewed me," kind of thing?

They do have form. Remember the anonymous form that didn't go anywhere? The dead mailto: link? And the CAPTCHA that was a GIF?

Iris wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

almostgothic wrote:"To type one number incorrectly may be regarded as error, to type two seems like blatant misrepresentation."
Lady Almost-Bracknell (cough)

Could it be that someone doesn't want too many people contacting the police? "I got in touch with the official Find Madeleine site, but no one interviewed me," kind of thing?

They do have form. Remember the anonymous form that didn't go anywhere? The dead mailto: link? And the CAPTCHA that was a GIF?

Thanks Iris. I had a vague recollection of that. Perhaps SY is hoping to find people who contacted or tried to contact the McCanns and were never interviewed.

AnnaEsse wrote:

almostgothic wrote:"To type one number incorrectly may be regarded as error, to type two seems like blatant misrepresentation."
Lady Almost-Bracknell (cough)

Could it be that someone doesn't want too many people contacting the police? "I got in touch with the official Find Madeleine site, but no one interviewed me," kind of thing?

It's strange, isn't it - if they really cared about the work that the Met are now doing and set great store by it, the least they could do is give out the right numbers.

almostgothic wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

almostgothic wrote:"To type one number incorrectly may be regarded as error, to type two seems like blatant misrepresentation."
Lady Almost-Bracknell (cough)

Could it be that someone doesn't want too many people contacting the police? "I got in touch with the official Find Madeleine site, but no one interviewed me," kind of thing?

It's strange, isn't it - if they really cared about the work that the Met are now doing and set great store by it, the least they could do is give out the right numbers.

This is only what I would expect TM to do - it proves the point I think. They don't really want any info they want to maintain the status quo.

Operation Grange
on 0800 096 1011 (in the UK free call)
+44(0) 158 0126 207 (non-UK free call)

Well, they have finally corrected the UK number. But the non-UK is still wrong. In fact it has been screwed up even more.

They really don't want any calls from Portugal, do they?

If anybody working for the Mccann's is monitoring this website (and we know you do) the correct numbers are:
UK Calls 0800 096 1011
non-UK Calls +44(0)207 158 0126

Get it right muppets.