VIDEO - If Madeleine is Alive - Who DIED in the MCann's Apartment?

If Madeleine is Alive - Who DIED in the MCann's Apartment?



For Facebook and Twitter:

McMinute VIDEO - If Madeleine is Alive - Who DIED in the MCann's Apartment?
https://youtu.be/nkkabHP4xlc

HiDeHo Twitter
https://twitter.com/#!/HiDeHo3

HiDeHo Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.php?id=100002389988016

Keep it going...i will retwitt it wen u twitt it

Another great video... and already tweeted.

Well done once again!

I bow before you, yer madge.

I was particularly pleased with the verse in the song..'She is gone but her presence is still heavy in the air ' (managed to fit it to the dogs alerting!)

Saturday afternoon...I really should get something else done!

Brilliant stuff, Hideho, well done

Can you do one about Gerry wanting a "Madeleine Day" later on in the year? He knew right away that she was not going to be found any time soon, and that is very suspicious.

Excellent HideHo!

HiDeHo

You are a genius indeed - another excellent video. You are going from strength to strength - steelmagnolia is featuring you videos too!

Mcminute on deleted calls/texts ? blue bag-nothing you could hide a tennis racket in ?

The dogs videos...are the dogs...

especially after cases since Maddies disappearance

EVIDENCE of a dead body inside murdered Kate Prout's home was discovered by a sniffer dog, it has emerged.

The "cadaver dog" homed in on an area in the living room of the Redmarley home she shared with her husband Adrian Prout, who was convicted of her killing last year.


The Suzanne Pilley murder trial in Edinburgh has heard how police used dogs which had been specially trained to find evidence of dead bodies

matthew wrote:Mcminute on deleted calls/texts ? blue bag-nothing you could hide a tennis racket in ?

The dogs videos...are the dogs...

especially after cases since Maddies disappearance

EVIDENCE of a dead body inside murdered Kate Prout's home was discovered by a sniffer dog, it has emerged.

The "cadaver dog" homed in on an area in the living room of the Redmarley home she shared with her husband Adrian Prout, who was convicted of her killing last year.


The Suzanne Pilley murder trial in Edinburgh has heard how police used dogs which had been specially trained to find evidence of dead bodies

Thanks matthew.

Deleted calls is on my mental list.

I started saving recent cases of cadaver dog success but got lenthy in the video I did last week (cant remember which one right now...I have done so many in the past week! ) so will do a mcminute on them

The blue bag I was contemplating today after reading a recent interview with Goncalo

Why didn't they prevent the shelving or ask for the case to be reopened

Why did their hire car have a dead body in it

15:19 markers is inconclusive but doesnt exclude Madeleine

Susan Smith/Diane Downs/Peterson etc comparison behaviour

100 day anniversary (suggested)

Police timetable for May 3/4
I spent a little time between videos to put a timeline together using police statements...I just have to summarise it..
http://forum2.aimoo.com/MadeleineMcCann/Timetables-from-POLICE-statements/Police-timetable-2-plus-PJ-1-1087205.html

I have lots I have already started...It is just a neverending possibility of topics.

After May 3rd I will focus on some for Tony

I have a special song for Madeleine video (have been working on for 18 mths) but needing a singer badly (if anyone is offering!)

So many more...Oh...and Corrie - Betty's wake...

Never mind another one for the slave's son (apologies its not happened yet but need more pics)

So...lots to carry on with

hi deho we owe you so much thankyou x

Thank you HiDeHo!

cass wrote:hi deho we owe you so much thankyou x

Nooooooooooo! Didn't I mention I love doing them!

I believe I make them in my sleep...I woke up this morning and wrote down the words in my head immediately...

Dreams are usually all those normal things...flying, swimming..etc etc...Not me...

In my dream I was putting together three boring clips and woke with this in my head "Law is not people compatible!'

I have no idea why I would be thinking/saying that to myself while asleep, but I do think I need a break from videos for a day or two!

I'd like to thank you too, for all your hard work, HiDeHO.

The videos you put out are so much more accessible for people who want to get to the nub of matters, and not, perhaps wade through screeds of written material.

With social media being so very much reliant on visual impact, this makes it particularly effective.

You've put in masses of hard graft and it looks like it's really starting to penetrate minds.

Alfiefinn wrote:
With social media being so very much reliant on visual impact, this makes it particularly effective.

You've put in masses of hard graft and it looks like it's really starting to penetrate minds.

Yes this is the very best and most effective way of getting the message across and HDH is an absolute star

Iris wrote:Brilliant stuff, Hideho, well done

Can you do one about Gerry wanting a "Madeleine Day" later on in the year? He knew right away that she was not going to be found any time soon, and that is very suspicious.

Yes he was planning in early June 2007 a future Madeleine day for later in the year trying to organise a Band Aid type concert if I remember. Also the current paperback edition of the bewk was available for pre order & promoted some 6 months ago! There are others that show that they had no hope of Maddie being found, and were just planning money spinning events for themselves instead

I just 're-released' this one on Twitter and Facebook, considering AR suggests the abduction was credible



The Impossible 3 min Window of Opportunity for Madeleine's 'Abduction'!
https://youtu.be/WaYLHtnEr8I

Excellent HiDeHo - but dont you know that if you are conducting a police review of the case then a small window of opportunity = she is still alive. In policing terms its called - 'jumping to conclusions'!!

When MATTHEW OLDFIELD went into the apartment at 9.30pm (after Maddie was taken) he saw nothing suspicious and the window was closed, well it must have been closed as at 10pm when kate went back she felt the wind in the apartment that alerted her and 'whoosh' the window was already open/shutters up.....

Therefore, the only only possible conclusion is that the abductor after having taken Maddie then WENT BACK 20 mins later to open the window!!!

Good one jd.

Lets also not forget that Gerry came in through the BACK doors was because he didn't want to dusturb them and yet his statement the following morning says he used his key and unlocked the door! See 7.00min

No Evidence of Abduction! - McCanns (2 of 2)

From gerrys statement 4th may 2007

"At about 21.30 his friend Matt (member of the group) went to the apartment, where his children were and on his way went to the witness' apartment, entering by means of a glass sliding door that was always unlocked and was located laterally to the building. He entered the bedroom, he observed the twins and he did not even notice whether Madeleine was there" as everything was calm, the shutters were closed and the door to the bedroom was ajar as usual. "After that Matt returned to the restaurant."

So from their very own statements/timelines...this means the abduction took place between 9.30 and 10pm....How could jane tanner see her abductor man before at 9.20pm???????????

jd16 wrote:From gerrys statement 4th may 2007

"At about 21.30 his friend Matt (member of the group) went to the apartment, where his children were and on his way went to the witness' apartment, entering by means of a glass sliding door that was always unlocked and was located laterally to the building. He entered the bedroom, he observed the twins and he did not even notice whether Madeleine was there" as everything was calm, the shutters were closed and the door to the bedroom was ajar as usual. "After that Matt returned to the restaurant."

So from their very own statements/timelines...this means the abduction took place between 9.30 and 10pm....How could jane tanner see her abductor man before at 9.20pm???????????

I wasn't aware Matthew Oldfield had checked Madeleine any time before this night & then only once

matthew wrote:
I wasn't aware Matthew Oldfield had checked Madeleine any time before this night & then only once

This totally flaws their timeline & jane tanners sighting (and falsely identifying murat as the abductor).... if anything it only gives credence to the Smith sighting at 10pm (the sighting they ignore)

jd16 wrote:When MATTHEW OLDFIELD went into the apartment at 9.30pm (after Maddie was taken) he saw nothing suspicious and the window was closed, well it must have been closed as at 10pm when kate went back she felt the wind in the apartment that alerted her and 'whoosh' the window was already open/shutters up.....

Therefore, the only only possible conclusion is that the abductor after having taken Maddie then WENT BACK 20 mins later to open the window!!!

jd16