dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
+8
Justiceforallkids
princess_leia
kathybelle
mossman
MaryB
ann_chovey
margaret
LJC
12 posters
Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
Dingo in clear over Azaria Chamberlain death, says cop
Wes Hosking
From: Herald Sun
June 11, 2012 12:00AM
TWO days away from the inquest ruling that could find a dingo killed Azaria Chamberlain, the only policeman at Uluru that night remains adamant there was human interference.
Lindy Chamberlain & Azaria
Lindy Chamberlain holding her baby daughter Azaria in mid 1980 before hear death. Supplied
Retired officer Frank Morris, who was at the Chamberlains' campsite within 10 minutes of the alarm being raised 32 years ago, said there was no way a dingo was to blame.
"There was human intervention, there definitely was," he told Channel 9 tonight.
Mr Morris did not say Azaria's parents Lindy and Michael were involved.
But he believes someone dumped the nine-week-old baby's singlet, jumpsuit and booties.
"At the end of the day, the dingo didn't put them there," he said.
"They were put there by a human."
Ms Chamberlain, now Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton, was jailed for murder over Azaria's death and her husband given a suspended sentence after being found guilty of being an accessory after the fact.
Both were exonerated and their convictions overturned after a royal commission in 1987.
They have relentlessly fought to have their daughter's death certificate changed from "unknown" to reflect that a dingo killed the baby.
Northern Territory coroner Elizabeth Morris's findings will be streamed live from the Darwin Magistrates' Court on Tuesday.
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
The paedophiledingo was spotted by Lindy earlier, looking at the baby during a walk as I remember. That's one of the things that argues against her imo. It's registered in you subconscious at least - mothers have strong instincts, especially new mothers. That's one.
The other one is the full story shouted out for the world to hear right at the start'They've taken her!''That' dingo's got my baby!
Not 'Help!' or even more normal the name of the child 'Maddie!' 'Azzie!' That's two.
Wasn't it also the case that the parents didn't search?
The other one is the full story shouted out for the world to hear right at the start
Not 'Help!' or even more normal the name of the child
Wasn't it also the case that the parents didn't search?
tigger- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 1740
Age : 58
Location : The Hague
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-07-02
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
tigger wrote:Thepaedophiledingo was spotted by Lindy earlier, looking at the baby during a walk as I remember. That's one of the things that argues against her imo. It's registered in you subconscious at least - mothers have strong instincts, especially new mothers. That's one.
The other one is the full story shouted out for the world to hear right at the start'They've taken her!''That' dingo's got my baby!
Not 'Help!' or even more normal the name of the child'Maddie!' 'Azzie!' That's two.
Wasn't it also the case that the parents didn't search?
no they didnt search the campers and aborginal trackers did
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
tigger wrote:Thepaedophiledingo was spotted by Lindy earlier, looking at the baby during a walk as I remember. That's one of the things that argues against her imo. It's registered in you subconscious at least - mothers have strong instincts, especially new mothers. That's one.
The other one is the full story shouted out for the world to hear right at the start'They've taken her!''That' dingo's got my baby!
Not 'Help!' or even more normal the name of the child'Maddie!' 'Azzie!' That's two.
Wasn't it also the case that the parents didn't search?
i dont know if lindy is guilty and we will probably never know but instict tells us that you dont leave a 9 week old baby in a tent in a known dingo area alone ( with her 4 year old brother ) human intervention has always been mentioned in this case so so if it wasnt lindy who was it who took azarias clothes off eher body and took them 5km to the rock ???
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
Justiceforallkids wrote:tigger wrote:Thepaedophiledingo was spotted by Lindy earlier, looking at the baby during a walk as I remember. That's one of the things that argues against her imo. It's registered in you subconscious at least - mothers have strong instincts, especially new mothers. That's one.
The other one is the full story shouted out for the world to hear right at the start'They've taken her!''That' dingo's got my baby!
Not 'Help!' or even more normal the name of the child'Maddie!' 'Azzie!' That's two.
Wasn't it also the case that the parents didn't search?
i dont know if lindy is guilty and we will probably never know but instict tells us that you dont leave a 9 week old baby in a tent in a known dingo area alone ( with her 4 year old brother ) human intervention has always been mentioned in this case so so if it wasnt lindy who was it who took azarias clothes off eher body and took them 5km to the rock ???
I agree that we will never know but it's never sat well with me - must read the report again but whose word do we have for it that Azaria was in the tent at that time? This could be a case of hiding a accident which happened earlier.
The religious angle was used - they said they were persecuted because of their beliefs. Kate said exactly the same thing and would you believe it, Philpott's wife was wearing two or three crosses on chains round her neck at the press conference. One I can believe, more is over-egging the pudding.
tigger- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 1740
Age : 58
Location : The Hague
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-07-02
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
lindy was seen holding azaria at the bbq/campsite according to those at the camping ground then put her to bed asleep and a few minutes later they heard lindy screaming a dingo has got my baby
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
Justiceforallkids wrote:lindy was seen holding azaria at the bbq/campsite according to those at the camping ground then put her to bed asleep and a few minutes later they heard lindy screaming a dingo has got my baby
I have just re-read Lindy's book (obviously written from her own point of view). She was holding the baby at the barbeque, all bundled up as it was cold.
The police questioned the other campers who were at the BBQ and one was asked if he actually saw the baby's feet move or did Lindy 'jerk' them so as to appear as if the child was alive??
There do seem to be similarities in the 2 cases....both mothers of 3 , husbands don't seem to be much help. Michael (Chamberlain) was pressing Lindy to finish up and one of the other kids decided he was still hungry, so she had to traipse back to the BBQ. All in all a stressy bedtime scenario.
ann_chovey- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 2529
Location : France
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-21
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
How did she know a dingo got her baby, did the other children tell her so?
If she screamed then surely the dingo would of dropped the baby with frIght thinking off his own preservation and ran off?
A 9 week old baby is far to big for the dog to hold in it's jaw, surely and I know some dingos are big but to be brave enough to walk Into a campsite full off people near a barbecue, I don't know.
I will never be 100% sure that she NEVER had anything to do with the disappearance off her daughter unlike the mccanns which without physical evidence I'm 99% sure going by what i have seen or read in the files that they had something to do with the disappearance off Madeleine.
If she screamed then surely the dingo would of dropped the baby with frIght thinking off his own preservation and ran off?
A 9 week old baby is far to big for the dog to hold in it's jaw, surely and I know some dingos are big but to be brave enough to walk Into a campsite full off people near a barbecue, I don't know.
I will never be 100% sure that she NEVER had anything to do with the disappearance off her daughter unlike the mccanns which without physical evidence I'm 99% sure going by what i have seen or read in the files that they had something to do with the disappearance off Madeleine.
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
I don't know how bold a hungary dingo would be, to sneak into a campsite full of people. If it was a case of the tents being a long way off from the BBQ area, then that is probably different. Did Mrs Chamberlain ever say she actually saw the dingo carrying her baby off?
LJC- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 2116
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-09-23
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
LJC wrote:I don't know how bold a hungary dingo would be, to sneak into a campsite full of people. If it was a case of the tents being a long way off from the BBQ area, then that is probably different. Did Mrs Chamberlain ever say she actually saw the dingo carrying her baby off?
here
http://www.lindychamberlain.com/content/legal/maps
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
it still begs the question how did the clothes get all the way to the rock and folded???
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
LJC wrote:I don't know how bold a hungary dingo would be, to sneak into a campsite full of people. If it was a case of the tents being a long way off from the BBQ area, then that is probably different. Did Mrs Chamberlain ever say she actually saw the dingo carrying her baby off?
The Chamberlains were at the BBQ grill, one son in his sleeping bag in the tent with Azaria. They were chatting to other campers when Aiden said 'was that bubby crying'? Sally (Greg's wife) agreed, 'yes it was'. Mike had also heard the cry , asked Lindy if Azaria had been settled, Lindy said 'yes' so Michael suggested she better go and check.
from the book.....
'I was halfway between the fence and the BBQ railing when I saw the head and shoulders of a dingo emerging through the tent flap.
It had its head down, shaking vigorously, and I thought it's got Michael's shoes, which were at the front of the tent. It seemed a pretty golden colour; the light from the BBQ shining through its coat made it look shiny and in beautiful condition. It wasn't one of the mangy ones we had seen before and the way it had its head down made the hair of its neck stand out in the light like a ruff. The light shining through the hairs on the outer edge of the ears made them look fluffy (I was later to have my description of the dingo criticised because of that mention of its ears) Its nose was in the shadows cast by the bushes and railing in front of the tent but the way it was swinging its head round made me think it had the shoe by the shoelace and couldn't get it through the tent flap properly. It was these observations which made me think it was probably a young dog.
I mumbled 'Go on, get out'! and then turned to tell the others.
I briefly noticed Aiden trailing a few feet behind me. As I was about to speak I suddenly thought there was no food in the tent and the realization that Michael had said Azaria had cried hit me. It flashed through my mind that dingoes were wild. When first asleep she slept heavily and it would actually have had to touch her to disturb her and it could have bitten her. The only thing visible was her head. She might need first aid. I was now one step closer past the bush and I could see into that dreadful ravaged tent. I started to scream to the others as I burst into headlong flight- the dingo's got the baby!
A few weeks later I wrote down my devastated feelings in an effort to get the horror out of my system and start dealing with life again.
ann_chovey- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 2529
Location : France
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-21
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
lindys open letter
A letter to Open-Minded Australians
It is hard to believe it is thirty years since my darling baby was taken. For some odd reason everyone says you will soon forget. Why is it that people expect me to forget a part of myself? Why would you? Loss of a loved one, particularly a child is not something you forget any more than you can get out of your mind that you once attended school. That does not mean you dwell on it all the time. It is simply there in the fabric of your life and history. In some ways it seems forever and in others it is like yesterday still. Yesterday are the happy memories, and the years are the pain.
I choose to dwell on the happy memories and not on the pain. Dwelling on the pain is only something that those who wish you harm hope that you will do. They want you miserable. I don't wish to be miserable. That is why I learned what forgiveness really is and put it in to practise. You always hear people say to forgive, but they don't tell you how to do it and that is key. Once you learn that, you wonder why you didn't do it before. Forgiveness is for yourself, it puts the responsibility on those who hurt you, and lets you get on with your life. It does not say it is ok to hurt me, then hurt me again. It simply says yes you hurt me, you had no right to do that to me but you did. I acknowledge that you did that and that I am not responsible for your actions. I will not take over the continuation of you actions towards me by allowing you or them to dwell in my mind and continue to fester and ruin my life. I have taken back control of my own life and head space and move forward. I am moving forward, not looking backward.
So, have I forgiven everyone involved in creating the fiasco of the last thirty years and the public so willing to believe the worst and spread nasty rumours? Of course I have. I have handed the hurt back to those who caused it and it is up to them as individuals to ask God to forgive them for what they did, because I forgave long ago and moved on. Oh and despite what some headlines have said in the last twelve months, that does include the police, politicians and lawyers of the NT. It would be nice to get a voluntary apology, but I am no longer holding my breath.
Did you know that the truth is not a defence for libel in Australia? Ridiculous as that sounds that is the law as it currently stands. So if you tell the truth about someone you can be charged with libel if you say something a person has done wrong but which they want to remain hidden. They can have you charged in court because you told the truth and revealed their dirty dealing. Of course once you are in court (or under parliamentary privilege) you can say whatever truth or lies you like and no one can touch you for it. I believe one should be able to tell the truth openly without having to be dragged into court by corrupt people covering their trails. Unfortunately the way the law stands now I cannot tell you of any internal deals, deliberate lies, affairs or favours that I may know of that may make what happened in my case a lot clearer. If I did I would be charged with libel and the truth doesn't count in Australia yet.
Now it seems like in the centuries to come there will still be arguments over who said what, where and how. It seems to me that it is ridiculous that people will believe all that stuff. Can they not even try to think for themselves but believe everything they are told to think by someone else? In the last couple of weeks I discover I apparently did twice the amount of time in prison that I actually did, in Berrimah Prison no less, despite it being quite obvious that I was in Darwin Prison and Berrimah was only the suburb. Berrima Gaol is in NSW. Only very subtle changes you say and nit picking. Yes you are right that the difference is small in one way - it is only one wrong word. Now look at it another way. One prison does not exist at all and the other is thousands of kilometres away. Now it becomes not such a small thing but totally misleading. This is where lies and rumours start. When the truth is dealt with this way, subtly leaving a word out here and changing one there, then it goes into the archives unchallenged because someone else thinks it is too small to matter and another mistake is let slide, or a deliberate omission or addition let go and you soon can bury the truth so deep that only the most vigilant will ever find it again.
Of courses you can start rumours like the one where I was supposed to have hit on the policemen who raided us! They wish! Of course they didn't bring that up in court. It is much easier to besmirch a person's reputation by starting a rumour or making a statement with no basis in fact that will surface accidentally or on purpose some time. Bury the fact that until the police told us we had to stay near the tent we had both searched. By belittling and burying it on the one hand and on the other use it as the excuse to say we sneaked away to bury Azarias' body, in the end was so successful that even the jury came to believe we didn't search, despite testimony to the contrary.
It is no wonder that the eyewitnesses resent being disbelieved again and again when they hear and see the stupid lies and innuendoes resurface again and again. You see it is the questions not asked in court that are often the most important. For example Murray Habys' evidence that he had found what the Aboriginals later confirmed were the tracks of the dingo that took Azaria and the marks where it had put her down. When we met him after he had given his evidence he told us he was not supposed to mention this, and only an odd question allowed him to say what he wished about what he had found. With selective or very technical evidence it is no wonder that modern day juries are no longer equipped to make an informed decision. We need an updated system for the modern age we live in so that there is less likelihood of the guilty going free (because they take advantage of the current inadequacies) and the innocent being charged because they expect the truth and fairness that once a court was based on. Now it is just a lethal game.
Come on Australia. Surely you cannot be proud of the fact that you can let yourself be duped again and again and come back for more of the same. We used to be a proud nation who saw through corruption and were willing to give a fair go. How many times do you have to be hoodwinked and led along by the nose before you demand something better from our courts, police force, politicians and media? There are good, honest, truthful people in all these fields. We need to support them in their struggle to clean up their profession and stand for truth and justice. Hitler got as far as he did because good people didn't wake up to the importance of the small details that did not look threatening on their own, until the avalanche engulfed all and it was too late to fix.
Painful as it may be at times we need to stand up and be counted. Change starts with the individual, the family, the local community, the town, the state, the country. It is not easy to decide not to let the small things slip, or give in to the bully because of the pain or embarrassment it may cause us, but if you don't do it you may as well die now. Grow a backbone before the world turns on you. Give up the desire for gossip and sensationalism. Use your brains for something useful. You may surprise yourself what you can achieve.
I thank God that the crown eyewitnesses in my case did have backbones as did quite a few ordinary Australians who were willing to stand up and say "hey I don't know what happened but something is not right here and we need all the facts" which paved the way for new legislation allowing for royal commissions in Australia now. This allows for all of the evidence, rumours, tip-offs and questions to be exhaustibly investigated. The commissioner in our case was asked to find our guilt or innocence. Although we argued otherwise, he did not feel he had been given the power to rule on whether cause of death was a dingo or not so did not rule on that. Despite that (the Crown always claimed that it was either me or a dingo), Moreling in his finding said we would be guilty "Ăf, in spite of so many considerations pointing to their innocence, the conclusion was reached that it had been proved beyond reasonable doubt that a dingo did not take the baby. In the light of all the evidence before the Commission, I am of the opinion that such a conclusion cannot be reached."
Our family will always remember today as the day truth was dragged in the dirt and trampled upon, but more than that it is the day our family was torn apart forever because we lost our beautiful little Azaria. She will always ever be what this ongoing fight for justice has been all about. She deserves justice. In light of all the evidence before the Commission, this should be reflected on her death certificate and not the open finding that is there now. It is not like the eyewitnesses are dead or that there was not a recommendation from the Royal Commission and the NT Supreme Court who quashed our convictions. It would not take more taxpayers money to do it. These courts were exhaustive, why not adopt their recommendations and stop wasting everyone's time, money and intelligence. Lindy or a dingo was the NT claim. Their own Commission proved it was not me, as I had told them all along, so why don't they accept their own claim now? It makes one wonder are they really after the truth, or just too stubborn or proud to admit that a mistake has been made? Who knows the reason, but most of all please do not forget that a beautiful little girl died tragically on this date thirty years ago.
Regards,
Lindy
A letter to Open-Minded Australians
It is hard to believe it is thirty years since my darling baby was taken. For some odd reason everyone says you will soon forget. Why is it that people expect me to forget a part of myself? Why would you? Loss of a loved one, particularly a child is not something you forget any more than you can get out of your mind that you once attended school. That does not mean you dwell on it all the time. It is simply there in the fabric of your life and history. In some ways it seems forever and in others it is like yesterday still. Yesterday are the happy memories, and the years are the pain.
I choose to dwell on the happy memories and not on the pain. Dwelling on the pain is only something that those who wish you harm hope that you will do. They want you miserable. I don't wish to be miserable. That is why I learned what forgiveness really is and put it in to practise. You always hear people say to forgive, but they don't tell you how to do it and that is key. Once you learn that, you wonder why you didn't do it before. Forgiveness is for yourself, it puts the responsibility on those who hurt you, and lets you get on with your life. It does not say it is ok to hurt me, then hurt me again. It simply says yes you hurt me, you had no right to do that to me but you did. I acknowledge that you did that and that I am not responsible for your actions. I will not take over the continuation of you actions towards me by allowing you or them to dwell in my mind and continue to fester and ruin my life. I have taken back control of my own life and head space and move forward. I am moving forward, not looking backward.
So, have I forgiven everyone involved in creating the fiasco of the last thirty years and the public so willing to believe the worst and spread nasty rumours? Of course I have. I have handed the hurt back to those who caused it and it is up to them as individuals to ask God to forgive them for what they did, because I forgave long ago and moved on. Oh and despite what some headlines have said in the last twelve months, that does include the police, politicians and lawyers of the NT. It would be nice to get a voluntary apology, but I am no longer holding my breath.
Did you know that the truth is not a defence for libel in Australia? Ridiculous as that sounds that is the law as it currently stands. So if you tell the truth about someone you can be charged with libel if you say something a person has done wrong but which they want to remain hidden. They can have you charged in court because you told the truth and revealed their dirty dealing. Of course once you are in court (or under parliamentary privilege) you can say whatever truth or lies you like and no one can touch you for it. I believe one should be able to tell the truth openly without having to be dragged into court by corrupt people covering their trails. Unfortunately the way the law stands now I cannot tell you of any internal deals, deliberate lies, affairs or favours that I may know of that may make what happened in my case a lot clearer. If I did I would be charged with libel and the truth doesn't count in Australia yet.
Now it seems like in the centuries to come there will still be arguments over who said what, where and how. It seems to me that it is ridiculous that people will believe all that stuff. Can they not even try to think for themselves but believe everything they are told to think by someone else? In the last couple of weeks I discover I apparently did twice the amount of time in prison that I actually did, in Berrimah Prison no less, despite it being quite obvious that I was in Darwin Prison and Berrimah was only the suburb. Berrima Gaol is in NSW. Only very subtle changes you say and nit picking. Yes you are right that the difference is small in one way - it is only one wrong word. Now look at it another way. One prison does not exist at all and the other is thousands of kilometres away. Now it becomes not such a small thing but totally misleading. This is where lies and rumours start. When the truth is dealt with this way, subtly leaving a word out here and changing one there, then it goes into the archives unchallenged because someone else thinks it is too small to matter and another mistake is let slide, or a deliberate omission or addition let go and you soon can bury the truth so deep that only the most vigilant will ever find it again.
Of courses you can start rumours like the one where I was supposed to have hit on the policemen who raided us! They wish! Of course they didn't bring that up in court. It is much easier to besmirch a person's reputation by starting a rumour or making a statement with no basis in fact that will surface accidentally or on purpose some time. Bury the fact that until the police told us we had to stay near the tent we had both searched. By belittling and burying it on the one hand and on the other use it as the excuse to say we sneaked away to bury Azarias' body, in the end was so successful that even the jury came to believe we didn't search, despite testimony to the contrary.
It is no wonder that the eyewitnesses resent being disbelieved again and again when they hear and see the stupid lies and innuendoes resurface again and again. You see it is the questions not asked in court that are often the most important. For example Murray Habys' evidence that he had found what the Aboriginals later confirmed were the tracks of the dingo that took Azaria and the marks where it had put her down. When we met him after he had given his evidence he told us he was not supposed to mention this, and only an odd question allowed him to say what he wished about what he had found. With selective or very technical evidence it is no wonder that modern day juries are no longer equipped to make an informed decision. We need an updated system for the modern age we live in so that there is less likelihood of the guilty going free (because they take advantage of the current inadequacies) and the innocent being charged because they expect the truth and fairness that once a court was based on. Now it is just a lethal game.
Come on Australia. Surely you cannot be proud of the fact that you can let yourself be duped again and again and come back for more of the same. We used to be a proud nation who saw through corruption and were willing to give a fair go. How many times do you have to be hoodwinked and led along by the nose before you demand something better from our courts, police force, politicians and media? There are good, honest, truthful people in all these fields. We need to support them in their struggle to clean up their profession and stand for truth and justice. Hitler got as far as he did because good people didn't wake up to the importance of the small details that did not look threatening on their own, until the avalanche engulfed all and it was too late to fix.
Painful as it may be at times we need to stand up and be counted. Change starts with the individual, the family, the local community, the town, the state, the country. It is not easy to decide not to let the small things slip, or give in to the bully because of the pain or embarrassment it may cause us, but if you don't do it you may as well die now. Grow a backbone before the world turns on you. Give up the desire for gossip and sensationalism. Use your brains for something useful. You may surprise yourself what you can achieve.
I thank God that the crown eyewitnesses in my case did have backbones as did quite a few ordinary Australians who were willing to stand up and say "hey I don't know what happened but something is not right here and we need all the facts" which paved the way for new legislation allowing for royal commissions in Australia now. This allows for all of the evidence, rumours, tip-offs and questions to be exhaustibly investigated. The commissioner in our case was asked to find our guilt or innocence. Although we argued otherwise, he did not feel he had been given the power to rule on whether cause of death was a dingo or not so did not rule on that. Despite that (the Crown always claimed that it was either me or a dingo), Moreling in his finding said we would be guilty "Ăf, in spite of so many considerations pointing to their innocence, the conclusion was reached that it had been proved beyond reasonable doubt that a dingo did not take the baby. In the light of all the evidence before the Commission, I am of the opinion that such a conclusion cannot be reached."
Our family will always remember today as the day truth was dragged in the dirt and trampled upon, but more than that it is the day our family was torn apart forever because we lost our beautiful little Azaria. She will always ever be what this ongoing fight for justice has been all about. She deserves justice. In light of all the evidence before the Commission, this should be reflected on her death certificate and not the open finding that is there now. It is not like the eyewitnesses are dead or that there was not a recommendation from the Royal Commission and the NT Supreme Court who quashed our convictions. It would not take more taxpayers money to do it. These courts were exhaustive, why not adopt their recommendations and stop wasting everyone's time, money and intelligence. Lindy or a dingo was the NT claim. Their own Commission proved it was not me, as I had told them all along, so why don't they accept their own claim now? It makes one wonder are they really after the truth, or just too stubborn or proud to admit that a mistake has been made? Who knows the reason, but most of all please do not forget that a beautiful little girl died tragically on this date thirty years ago.
Regards,
Lindy
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
Imo in both the above posts the long quotes from Lindy are ghostwritten - and by a much better ghostwriter than Kate employed, that's for sure.
The letter to 'Australia' - it doesn't make me change my mind - quite the contrary - the letter is an out and out PR exercise imo.
There is JonBenet Ramsey, the Dingo baby and Maddie - a lot of similarities and no solution.
The letter to 'Australia' - it doesn't make me change my mind - quite the contrary - the letter is an out and out PR exercise imo.
There is JonBenet Ramsey, the Dingo baby and Maddie - a lot of similarities and no solution.
tigger- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 1740
Age : 58
Location : The Hague
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-07-02
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
tigger wrote:Imo in both the above posts the long quotes from Lindy are ghostwritten - and by a much better ghostwriter than Kate employed, that's for sure.
The letter to 'Australia' - it doesn't make me change my mind - quite the contrary - the letter is an out and out PR exercise imo.
There is JonBenet Ramsey, the Dingo baby and Maddie - a lot of similarities and no solution.
If Kate McCann employed a ghost writer, she should ask for her money back.
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
Ye gods I hope that Kate's book was written only by herself - the thought of there being another person capable of dreaming up what was in it is too much for me to deal with!
As for the Chamberlains, their behaviour - especially when compared now with the McCanns - seems suspicious but at the time I gave them the benefit of the doubt. Now I just can't make up my mind at all!
As for the Chamberlains, their behaviour - especially when compared now with the McCanns - seems suspicious but at the time I gave them the benefit of the doubt. Now I just can't make up my mind at all!
Guest- Guest
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
Not Born Yesterday wrote:Ye gods I hope that Kate's book was written only by herself - the thought of there being another person capable of dreaming up what was in it is too much for me to deal with!
As for the Chamberlains, their behaviour - especially when compared now with the McCanns - seems suspicious but at the time I gave them the benefit of the doubt. Now I just can't make up my mind at all!
But it had really long words in it, many of more than three syllables, going by the literary quality of the diary - the ghost writer is a Mills and Boone fan with a hint of chick lit thrown in.
tigger- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 1740
Age : 58
Location : The Hague
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-07-02
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
p. 230 of the bewk
“On the night of 1 September I dreamed about Madeleine for the first time on four months…it was such a dreadful experience…Although I was dreaming, I could feel her. It was as if parts of my body that had been hibernating for months suddenly began to stir. I could sense the cold, dark days lifting as I luxuriated in warmth and light. And Madeleine was holding me, her little arms wrapped tightly round me, and it felt so good, I could smell her, I could feel her with every one of my senses as I soaked up this heavenly moment. My Madeleine. I wanted to stay like this for ever. And then I woke up. Ice began to course through my body, driving out every endorphin and remnant of warmth. I didn’t understand. What was happening? How could this be? I could still feel her! A heavy boot connected with my stomach and the ache in my chest was worse than I’d known it. I was struggling for breath, almost as if I were being strangled. Please God, don’t let her go! Stay with me, Madeleine. Please stay with me. Don’t go – stay with Mummy. Please, sweetheart, hold on. I love you so much. I started to cry. The crying built into seismic sobs. An unearthly sound, like the howl of a wounded animal, was coming out of my mouth. The crushing pain in my chest intensified to the point where I thought I was going to die.
Dreadful experience - but Maddie was holding her (note: not Kate holding Maddie). It was a heavenly moment and warmth and light etc. surely that would have been a comfort imo.
Then we get an overdose of violence, endorphin to remind us she's a doctor, heavy boot, ache in chest, struggling breath, strangled, seismic sobs, unearthly howl and wounded animal, finishing off with a crushing chest pain (I thought the boot was in the stomach?) and death.
Dreadful prose and so overdone it doesn't actually convey the emotion at all. We still never learn anything about Maddie only about Kate.
The cold dark days lifting? They were in Portugal the whole time, Kate and Gerry had terrific suntans - how hot do you want it?
'
“On the night of 1 September I dreamed about Madeleine for the first time on four months…it was such a dreadful experience…Although I was dreaming, I could feel her. It was as if parts of my body that had been hibernating for months suddenly began to stir. I could sense the cold, dark days lifting as I luxuriated in warmth and light. And Madeleine was holding me, her little arms wrapped tightly round me, and it felt so good, I could smell her, I could feel her with every one of my senses as I soaked up this heavenly moment. My Madeleine. I wanted to stay like this for ever. And then I woke up. Ice began to course through my body, driving out every endorphin and remnant of warmth. I didn’t understand. What was happening? How could this be? I could still feel her! A heavy boot connected with my stomach and the ache in my chest was worse than I’d known it. I was struggling for breath, almost as if I were being strangled. Please God, don’t let her go! Stay with me, Madeleine. Please stay with me. Don’t go – stay with Mummy. Please, sweetheart, hold on. I love you so much. I started to cry. The crying built into seismic sobs. An unearthly sound, like the howl of a wounded animal, was coming out of my mouth. The crushing pain in my chest intensified to the point where I thought I was going to die.
Dreadful experience - but Maddie was holding her (note: not Kate holding Maddie). It was a heavenly moment and warmth and light etc. surely that would have been a comfort imo.
Then we get an overdose of violence, endorphin to remind us she's a doctor, heavy boot, ache in chest, struggling breath, strangled, seismic sobs, unearthly howl and wounded animal, finishing off with a crushing chest pain (I thought the boot was in the stomach?) and death.
Dreadful prose and so overdone it doesn't actually convey the emotion at all. We still never learn anything about Maddie only about Kate.
The cold dark days lifting? They were in Portugal the whole time, Kate and Gerry had terrific suntans - how hot do you want it?
'
tigger- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 1740
Age : 58
Location : The Hague
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-07-02
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
tigger wrote:
Then we get an overdose of violence, endorphin to remind us she's a doctor, heavy boot, ache in chest, struggling breath, strangled.
Could be worse, l thought she was going to write she was awakening to torture from that wicked PJ....!
margaret- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 4406
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-25
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
margaret wrote:tigger wrote:
Then we get an overdose of violence, endorphin to remind us she's a doctor, heavy boot, ache in chest, struggling breath, strangled.
Could be worse, l thought she was going to write she was awakening to torture from that wicked PJ....!
Lol.....the 'boot' bit, I always wondered if it was Gerry giving her a dig in the ribs.
ann_chovey- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 2529
Location : France
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-21
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
i do think taht it isa good sign even all these years later that the police are still working on azarias case
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
I've never ever believed the dingo story.
MaryB- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1581
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-09-15
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
BREAKING NEWS: A fourth coronial inquest finds Azaria Chamberlain was taken by a dingo. Full coverage on 7 News tonight at 6.
A NORTHERN Territory coroner has found that Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton's daughter Azaria was taken by a dingo.
NT coroner Elizabeth Morris handed down the findings of a fourth coronial inquest into the disappearance of the nine-week-old baby at Uluru in 1980 in Darwin today.
A NORTHERN Territory coroner has found that Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton's daughter Azaria was taken by a dingo.
NT coroner Elizabeth Morris handed down the findings of a fourth coronial inquest into the disappearance of the nine-week-old baby at Uluru in 1980 in Darwin today.
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
it still doent explain the folded clothes
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: dingo is in the clear over baby azaria
A dingo took Azaria Chamberlain - ruling
AAP
From: Herald Sun
June 12, 2012 10:59AM
Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton arrives in Darwin for a ruling on the fourth inquest into her baby's disappearance. Picture: Justin Sanson Northern Territory News
UPDATE: A DINGO killed Azaria Chamberlain after it dragged her from a tent at a campsite at Uluru in 1980, Coroner Elizabeth Morris has ruled.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
Recommended Coverage
Lindy in Darwin for Azaria result
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
The coroner told a packed courtroom in Darwin that a dingo or dingoes were to blame for the attack at Uluru, which originally saw Azaria's mother Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton jailed for murder and her husband Michael given a suspended sentence for being an accessory after the fact.
Both were later exonerated after a royal commission in 1987.
The finding means Ms Chamberlain-Creighton, as she is known after remarrying, and her ex-husband Michael Chamberlain have finally won recognition that a dingo killed their nine-week-old daughter.
The inquest was the fourth into the death of Azaria since she disappeared on a camping trip.
The decision will mean that Azaria's death certificate will be changed from "unknown".
In 1988, the Northern Territory Court of Criminal Appeal overturned all convictions against the Chamberlains but a coronial inquest in 1995 delivered an open verdict.
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» The Dingo Baby Case re-opened
» 'Dingo Baby' case to be re-opened in Australia
» Lindy Chamberlain says she could have lost all her children
» Hong Kong demonstrations....China warns U.K. not to interfere
» the azaria case reopening is what set the mcanns off
» 'Dingo Baby' case to be re-opened in Australia
» Lindy Chamberlain says she could have lost all her children
» Hong Kong demonstrations....China warns U.K. not to interfere
» the azaria case reopening is what set the mcanns off
Page 1 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum