Pat Brown-The Daily Profiler

Criminal Profiling Topic of the Day: Sherlock Holmes on Scotland Yard's Madeleine McCann Review

W: So, Holmes, what do you think Scotland Yard is doing in the Madeleine McCann case?

H: Well, Watson, there are only two options: they are searching for truth and justice or they are using four million taxpayer dollars to cover up a crime.

W: What would show they are searching for truth and justice, Holmes?

H: They would be seeking justice for those who perpetrated crimes against a little three-year-old girl.

W: So, they would be following evidence and statistics which would mean they would look at the parents first (evidence that they were the last ones to see her, they admitted to her neglect, cadaver and blood dogs hit in their apartment and car, etc., - and statistics that show caretakers are the ones most likely involved when a child of Madeleine's age disappears or dies in their care) and then for a local child sex predator who murdered her (when caretakers are not involved, then statistics overwhelmingly support a child this age would be kidnapped, raped, and murdered within an hour by a man living in the vicinity).

H: Correct, Watson. But, Scotland Yard hasn't spent any time analyzing the possibility of the parents' involvement in their daughter's disappearance nor the possibility of their friends' involvement in her disappearance nor have they spent any time focusing on the vicinity of the McCann's apartment or a local child sex predator.

W: I am confused, Holmes. Are you saying that they have spent four million dollars sifting through tips that would take them out of Portugal in search of a live Maddie living with a family somewhere?

H: This is what appears to be the fact, Watson.

W: Well, then, Holmes, I would have to deduce that Scotland Yard is rife with dunces or corruption.

H: Bravo, Watson! I think you have hit the nail on the head! All the evidence points to Madeleine McCann being dead but her parents and Scotland Yard have collectively purportedly spent some eight million dollars not seeking justice for little Maddie and not seeking to punish the perpetrator or perpetrators, but instead appear to be focusing on a statistical anomaly in spite of evidence to the contrary, that she is alive and being cared for by strangers for the last five years. Yet none of the investigators, not the McCann hired PIs nor Scotland Yard, has presented ONE shred of evidence to validate this cock-and-bull theory.

W: Then, why, Holmes are so many attacking the Portuguese police, retired Detective Goncalo Amaral, Criminal Profiler Pat Brown, and the others who have worked to analyze the case and provide theories and evidence of Madeleine having been murdered in Praia da Luz? These folks haven't been milking the public and citizens of millions of dollars and then refusing to show them any of what they have discovered during their investigations?

H: Ah, Watson, I guess because there are a lot of people out there who just can't accept that Madeleine McCann is dead, has been dead, and will be dead, and there is not going to be a happy ending to the story.

W: Whoa, Holmes, aren't you afraid to say unequivocally that Madeleine McCann is dead? Aren't you worried the McCanns and Carter Ruck will be suing your deductive ass?

H: Well, let them have at it, Watson! Since I am a fictional character, they can sue me for my fictional money, and I will happily send them a fictional check for the fictional Madeleine Search Fund with my fictional signature on it. Good luck cashing that at the bank.


Criminal Profiler Pat Brown

July 6, 2012

http://patbrownprofiling.blogspot.co.uk/

A good read and I think with the evidence of no progress so far, I think it is fair to say that the Review is just a time-waster and free trips to Portugal for the police.

Progress would be interviewing the McCanns and the Tapas group i.e. the main suspects. To ignore the indications of the 2 dogs is beyond stupidity. How can any professional policeman think Madeleine is alive with zero evidence in that direction but with cadaver hits on the McCann clothes , CC and in a hire car which was hired over 20 days after the disappearance. All the testimonies conflict and one didn't need to be a genius to work out that a lot of lies have been told.

As long as the McCann case drags on, it is proof that corruption is rife in the UK...so many other corruption issues in the UK also...

ps Amnesia = Levesism

whatsupdoc wrote:A good read and I think with the evidence of no progress so far, I think it is fair to say that the Review is just a time-waster and free trips to Portugal for the police.

Progress would be interviewing the McCanns and the Tapas group i.e. the main suspects. To ignore the indications of the 2 dogs is beyond stupidity. How can any professional policeman think Madeleine is alive with zero evidence in that direction but with cadaver hits on the McCann clothes , CC and in a hire car which was hired over 20 days after the disappearance. All the testimonies conflict and one didn't need to be a genius to work out that a lot of lies have been told.

As long as the McCann case drags on, it is proof that corruption is rife in the UK...so many other corruption issues in the UK also...

ps Amnesia = Levesism

Sorry, but I don't think it's fair to say that at all: There are issues of time (ie What might happen in future phases of the Review), of Terms of Reference (It's a Review, not an Investigation), of Jurisdiction (ie Who is empowered by Law to conduct further interviews), and of Protocol.

The evidence of lack of progress means nothing at all - It is entirely right and proper that the Review is being conducted without the need to prejudice its findings by providing any form of running commentary. Andy Redwood busted a gut to say nothing to give the game away during his Panorama appearance. Quite right too.

I prefer to sit back and wait ...............


The undeniable fact that corruption does exist and is highly topical is, to my mind, good reason for the Review Team (which includes Murder Specialists) to be squeaky clean and to demonstrate that the vast majority of us are decent, honest, professional and diligent.

Goncalo Amaral has stated that the case was halted because of political pressure from the UK. The Rog letters were delayed and to me it shows the UK just wants to drag it's feet.

There is a LOT of corruption in governments, let's not kid ourselves. 9/11 was a false flag and the UK has to agree with the US saying it was a terrorist attack because of all our ties. The evidence is overwhelming. The twin towers falling at free fall speed and building 7 fiasco ...so how big a lie does one need to realise what is going on? I could say a lot more but I'm not here to save the sheeple.

Offcourse Scotland Yard will soon announce their findings,they will conclude that the Portuguese Police were on the right track as originally endorsed by the British Police .They will also conclude that the the British Government is corrupt.Cameron will resign and Brown and Bliar will be arrested and taken to prison.They will conclude that the mccanns were guilty of manslaughter and concealment of a body.The mccanns will be sent back to Portugal for trial and then found guilty and sentanced to 15 years in prison.
These will be the findings of the Scotland Yard review for all you who doubt their integrity that is that.

Only 15 years?

whatsupdoc wrote:Goncalo Amaral has stated that the case was halted because of political pressure from the UK. The Rog letters were delayed and to me it shows the UK just wants to drag it's feet.

There is a LOT of corruption in governments, let's not kid ourselves. 9/11 was a false flag and the UK has to agree with the US saying it was a terrorist attack because of all our ties. The evidence is overwhelming. The twin towers falling at free fall speed and building 7 fiasco ...so how big a lie does one need to realise what is going on? I could say a lot more but I'm not here to save the sheeple.

!00% agree with all the above ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Read it in the papers, accept it, do not question it. End of!!!

Thanks Fred.

Nice dream, Lioned. It won't happen coz Blair knows things which are never to be revealed...I'd better not say too much...

fred wrote:

whatsupdoc wrote:Goncalo Amaral has stated that the case was halted because of political pressure from the UK. The Rog letters were delayed and to me it shows the UK just wants to drag it's feet.

There is a LOT of corruption in governments, let's not kid ourselves. 9/11 was a false flag and the UK has to agree with the US saying it was a terrorist attack because of all our ties. The evidence is overwhelming. The twin towers falling at free fall speed and building 7 fiasco ...so how big a lie does one need to realise what is going on? I could say a lot more but I'm not here to save the sheeple.

!00% agree with all the above ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Read it in the papers, accept it, do not question it. End of!!!

So was Goncalo Amaral telling lies, when he said that the McCanns demanded the case was closed? This is his quote from the NHS. The McCanns Abuse of Power website. "I remind you that they "demanded" the archiving of the process in 2008, when they were arguidos, merely to defend their image. They are not interested in the reopening of the process or the investigation."

I've got no reason to believe Goncalo Amaral was telling lies, but I find it strange that he doesn't mention the McCanns part in the closing of the case. I have actually heard Goncalo Amaral say that the McCanns with help from the British Government, closed the case.

fred wrote:

whatsupdoc wrote:Goncalo Amaral has stated that the case was halted because of political pressure from the UK. The Rog letters were delayed and to me it shows the UK just wants to drag it's feet.

There is a LOT of corruption in governments, let's not kid ourselves. 9/11 was a false flag and the UK has to agree with the US saying it was a terrorist attack because of all our ties. The evidence is overwhelming. The twin towers falling at free fall speed and building 7 fiasco ...so how big a lie does one need to realise what is going on? I could say a lot more but I'm not here to save the sheeple.

!00% agree with all the above ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Read it in the papers, accept it, do not question it. End of!!!

Morning whatsupdoc

Agree 100% with your first paragraph, especially that the UK Govt dragged its feet to scupper the McCanns getting their comeuppance. Agree also there is enormous corruption in all governments. Disagree 100% with your second paragraph regarding 9/11.

Good morning, pennylane.

I have studied 9/11 videos for years and the evidence that it was a government job is overwhelming. I am 100% convinced. There are so many things which show it as a fake...they brought the Towers down perfectly but Larry Silverstein said they should "pull" Building 7 at around 1200 to save life. So it was pulled 5 hours later...it couldn't have been rigged to blow in 5 hours and the BBC had it still up. Larry got 7 Billion $ from the insurance as he had two claims of 3.5 Billion $ on each Tower.

The main reason for 9/11 was a call to arms for the Iraq war and to keep the arms industry going as well as oil.

The Towers were not making money. They needed the asbestos removing, an impossibly expensive operation.
Building 7 housed the CIA, FBI, Enron data , plus, plus and was a command & control building. It was a bonus having that pulled.

It was NOT a pancake collapse as only fine dust was left. Thermate was used to produce the high temperatures which were seen on the satellite images of over 1200 degrees. The ground was too hot for the firemen to walk on for weeks after. The steel pillars were angled which was a sign of shaped charges being used. The steel was hurriedly shipped out to China.

There were slip-ups in the videos shown and infact they had to do an emergency fade to black to cover up a mistake due to a helicopter drifting out of position.
The idea that an aluminium plane would penetrate far into a steel building is flawed.

PS The jet engine that flew out the other side of the tower found on the pavement was not the correct type of engine i.e. NOT from the claimed type of jet.

I find it a disgrace that all the jets providing cover for New York were sent on a wild goose chase hundreds of miles away on an exercise.


Everyone is free to have their own views.

whatsupdoc wrote:Good morning, pennylane.

I have studied 9/11 videos for years and the evidence that it was a government job is overwhelming. I am 100% convinced. There are so many things which show it as a fake...they brought the Towers down perfectly but Larry Silverstein said they should "pull" Building 7 at around 1200 to save life. So it was pulled 5 hours later...it couldn't have been rigged to blow in 5 hours and the BBC had it still up. Larry got 7 Billion $ from the insurance as he had two claims of 3.5 Billion $ on each Tower.

The main reason for 9/11 was a call to arms for the Iraq war and to keep the arms industry going as well as oil.

The Towers were not making money. They needed the asbestos removing, an impossibly expensive operation.
Building 7 housed the CIA, FBI, Enron data , plus, plus and was a command & control building. It was a bonus having that pulled.

It was NOT a pancake collapse as only fine dust was left. Thermate was used to produce the high temperatures which were seen on the satellite images of over 1200 degrees. The ground was too hot for the firemen to walk on for weeks after. The steel pillars were angled which was a sign of shaped charges being used. The steel was hurriedly shipped out to China.

There were slip-ups in the videos shown and infact they had to do an emergency fade to black to cover up a mistake due to a helicopter drifting out of position.
The idea that an aluminium plane would penetrate far into a steel building is flawed.

PS The jet engine that flew out the other side of the tower found on the pavement was not the correct type of engine i.e. NOT from the claimed type of jet.

I find it a disgrace that all the jets providing cover for New York were sent on a wild goose chase hundreds of miles away on an exercise.


Everyone is free to have their own views.

Why not start a topic on this? I've had a look around and 'Message Board,' might be a good place for it. Or maybe 'Politics.' Yes, 'Politics.'

I think it would have been a wee bit easier if the US would have got stuck in when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait if they were that gung ho, the world and the UN was behind them - but they weren't very interested at the time it seems. So they decided to wait a few years and then go about wiping out their own capital, the pentagon, the economy, the stock market and on and on, all in one foul sweep, and inflict massive death and destruction on themselves.

Sorry don't agree with you doc, no way.... not in a million. I'm not saying all kinds of sleazy things haven't happened before and since where oil and the Middle East is concerned... but I don't buy that particular theory. I have read the pro's and con's too btw.

Anyway, back on topic, because I feel this could be rather time-consuming

Hi Anna

I am sure such a topic would be most interesting to some.... but I won't be visiting it.... I get a major head ache when I come across the '9/11 was an inside job' subject.

whatsupdoc wrote:Good morning, pennylane.

I have studied 9/11 videos for years and the evidence that it was a government job is overwhelming. I am 100% convinced. There are so many things which show it as a fake...they brought the Towers down perfectly but Larry Silverstein said they should "pull" Building 7 at around 1200 to save life. So it was pulled 5 hours later...it couldn't have been rigged to blow in 5 hours and the BBC had it still up. Larry got 7 Billion $ from the insurance as he had two claims of 3.5 Billion $ on each Tower.

The main reason for 9/11 was a call to arms for the Iraq war and to keep the arms industry going as well as oil.

The Towers were not making money. They needed the asbestos removing, an impossibly expensive operation.
Building 7 housed the CIA, FBI, Enron data , plus, plus and was a command & control building. It was a bonus having that pulled.

It was NOT a pancake collapse as only fine dust was left. Thermate was used to produce the high temperatures which were seen on the satellite images of over 1200 degrees. The ground was too hot for the firemen to walk on for weeks after. The steel pillars were angled which was a sign of shaped charges being used. The steel was hurriedly shipped out to China.

There were slip-ups in the videos shown and infact they had to do an emergency fade to black to cover up a mistake due to a helicopter drifting out of position.
The idea that an aluminium plane would penetrate far into a steel building is flawed.

PS The jet engine that flew out the other side of the tower found on the pavement was not the correct type of engine i.e. NOT from the claimed type of jet.

I find it a disgrace that all the jets providing cover for New York were sent on a wild goose chase hundreds of miles away on an exercise.


Everyone is free to have their own views.

Excellent, fully agree with you.

I too am 100% convinced and its a topic that can be very addictive once you start researching

(I certainly know a great deal more about nano thermite than what I did some years ago )

I certainly don't need convincing that 9/11 was a set up job. For me, one of the initial WTF moments was when it was proved that mobile phones don't work above a certain altitude and so those heart-breaking calls from people on the planes to loved ones could not have been genuine. The other two plane crashes (on the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania) are equally bizarre. We are expected to believe that two planes, their passengers and belongings completely disintegrated, leaving nothing behind.

Today is of course the 7th anniversary of the London bombings and my thoughts are with those who were caught up in what was another set up job. Once I found out that the "bombers" could not have got to London in time to set off the train bombs, I started reading up all the other things that the media wasn't telling us. Here's just one very good site. http://julyseventh.co.uk/

That is interesting. would be good to have separate thread on this so we can
discuss.

and maybe some other mysteries too.

a retired policeman? Don't answer if you don't want to... but you often talk sense, with obvious knowledge of the positive side of police work... Just asking. Oh. maybe that's an illegitimate topic fo on here. If so.. sorry?

comperedna wrote:a retired policeman? Don't answer if you don't want to... but you often talk sense, with obvious knowledge of the positive side of police work... Just asking. Oh. maybe that's an illegitimate topic fo on here. If so.. sorry?

Law Enforcement goes beyond the Police Service, but you're on the right lines.

And thankyou for qualifying your kind comment by saying "often"............... I can assure you it certainly isn't "always"!

You are too modest!

Hmm ............. in real life, I have been known to fail to conceal my light 'neath a bushel

Anyway, most here seem pretty civilised and genuine and I enjoy sensible contributions whether I agree with them or not.

After all, it's still question time and many answers are still required.

Not Born Yesterday wrote:I certainly don't need convincing that 9/11 was a set up job. For me, one of the initial WTF moments was when it was proved that mobile phones don't work above a certain altitude and so those heart-breaking calls from people on the planes to loved ones could not have been genuine. The other two plane crashes (on the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania) are equally bizarre. We are expected to believe that two planes, their passengers and belongings completely disintegrated, leaving nothing behind.

Today is of course the 7th anniversary of the London bombings and my thoughts are with those who were caught up in what was another set up job. Once I found out that the "bombers" could not have got to London in time to set off the train bombs, I started reading up all the other things that the media wasn't telling us. Here's just one very good site. http://julyseventh.co.uk/

That site is superb NBY.

The placement of the Jag for starters.

Inside job no doubt and yet an idiotic job at that.