Amaral loses case against Correia

I came across the hounding of the McCanns by accident and read this........can anyone check if it is true?



Wednesday, July 18, 2012Video Link To Court Results

http://www.tvi24.iol.pt/aa---videos---sociedade/goncalo-amaral-aragao-correia-tvi24/1362116-5795.html
Posted by tony at 18.7.12
CMJ On Marcos's Case

.

Amaral loses and pays the costs lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia and college Professor António Pedro Dores were yesterday acquitted in Court of Faro, the crime of defamation, in an action brought by the former Judicial Police Gonçalo Amaral. The defendants were also acquitted of claim for compensation of 3,000 euros. Goncalo Amaral was ordered to pay the costs of the Court.


Marcos Aragão Correia was accused of having published a report in April 2008, on behalf of the Association against exclusion by development (ACED), presided over by António Professor António Pedro Dores, in which accused Amaral to have watched "complacent" at torture that leonor off target, carried out by his subordinates. This second report that was made by Leonor Cipriano.

The court found that Professor António Pedro Dores"had no knowledge of the report" and that Marcos Aragão Correia "acted in pursuit of legitimate interests, convinced that the testimony of Leonor Cipriano was true, so acquitted both defendants

http://www.cmjornal.xl.pt/detalhe/noticias/nacional/portugal/amaral-perde--e-paga-custas
Posted by tony at 18.7.12
Tuesday, July 17, 2012The lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia and Professor António Pedro Dores, accused of defaming former Inspector of Judicial Police Gonçalo Amaral, now know the decision of the Court of Faro, and the prosecutor asked for acquittal.

Accused of defaming former inspector Gonçalo Amaral know today the court decision

By Agencia Lusa, em posted July 17, 2012 - 09:45 | Updated 4 hours 49 minutes ha

The lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia and Professor António Pedro Dores, accused of defaming former Inspector of Judicial Police Gonçalo Amaral, now know the decision of the Court of Faro, and the prosecutor asked for acquittal.

Leonor Cipriano's lawyer, Aragão Correia, and the president of the Association Against Exclusion for Development (ACED), Antonio Pedro Dores, are accused of defaming the former inspector, who investigated for nearly eight years the disappearance of Jane, daughter of Eleanor Cipriano.

The complaint, filed by Gonçalo Amaral, now retired, was prompted by an April 2008 document titled "Report on Torture Leonor Cipriano perpetrated by the Judicial Police," which Aragão Correia prepared for ACED and was broadcast by the association.

In 2009, Gonçalo Amaral was sentenced to eighteen months' imprisonment suspended for making false allegations in the trial of former inspectors and officials accused of torture PJ's mother Joan.

However, the former inspector considered that this report was "damaging the honor and consideration personal and professional" and therefore decided to refer Aragão Correia and President of ACED, for defamation.

The Public Ministry (MP) asks for absolution, and argues that both failed to make sense to talk about defamation, since all evidence points to the existence of torture, despite never having tasted exactly your own.

Heard as a witness in closing arguments of the trial, Leonor described the inspectors put a bag over his head, kicked around the body and hit him with a telephone card and a blunt object.

Reportedly, the attacks continued after they have forced to kneel on two glass ashtrays, she said transported by the Gonçalo Amaral.

Leonor and the missing girl's uncle, João Cipriano, were convicted in November 2004 to 20 years and four months and 19 years and two months imprisonment, respectively, for murder and concealment of a corpse.

On appeal, the sentence of Leonor Cipriano was reduced to 16 years and eight months
Posted by tony at 17.7.12
Doctor Marcos Aragão Correia and Professor António Pedro Dores. Not Guilty Of The Charges Of Defamation; A Case Brought Against Them By Amaral


Doctor Marcos Aragão Correia and Professor António Pedro Dores. Were Declared NOT-GUILTY of all charges!!!!!! The Case Of Defamation Brought By Disgrace Ex Cop, Goncalo de Sousa Amaral, blew up in Amaral's face when the judge agreed with the defendants.
The torture of Leonor Cipriano perpetrated by the portuguese police is once again confirmed;
The serious and active involvement of Goncalo de Sousa Amaral in that torture is once again confirmed;
Goncalo de Sousa Amaral was condemn to pay all the court expenses;
since the Public Prosecutor also asked for the non-guilty verdict, no more appeals are possible!

My take on this, WAY TO GO MARCOS!!!!!!!!! What a great day for Justice!!!!!!

Its here, Panda
https://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t21092-any-word-about-goncalo-amaral-yet-edit-verdict-ruled-against-ga-but-he-was-cleared-of-toture

Doctor Marcos Aragão Correia and Professor António Pedro Dores. Were Declared NOT-GUILTY of all charges!!!!!! The Case Of Defamation Brought By Disgrace Ex Cop, Goncalo de Sousa Amaral, blew up in Amaral's face when the judge agreed with the defendants.
The torture of Leonor Cipriano perpetrated by the portuguese police is once again confirmed;
The serious and active involvement of Goncalo de Sousa Amaral in that torture is once again confirmed;
Goncalo de Sousa Amaral was condemn to pay all the court expenses;
since the Public Prosecutor also asked for the non-guilty verdict, no more appeals are possible!
No, he didn't.
No, it wasn't.
Lie. It wasn't.
Not confirmed anywhere else.
Not confirmed anywhere else.

Where, exactly, did you say you saw this, Panda?

wjk wrote:Its here, Panda
https://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t21092-any-word-about-goncalo-amaral-yet-edit-verdict-ruled-against-ga-but-he-was-cleared-of-toture

Thanks wjk, why couldn't JFAK write a briefer Topic.

wjk wrote:Its here, Panda
https://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t21092-any-word-about-goncalo-amaral-yet-edit-verdict-ruled-against-ga-but-he-was-cleared-of-toture

Thanks wjk, why couldn't JFAK write a briefer Topic.

Iris wrote:Doctor Marcos Aragão Correia and Professor António Pedro Dores. Were Declared NOT-GUILTY of all charges!!!!!! The Case Of Defamation Brought By Disgrace Ex Cop, Goncalo de Sousa Amaral, blew up in Amaral's face when the judge agreed with the defendants.
The torture of Leonor Cipriano perpetrated by the portuguese police is once again confirmed;
The serious and active involvement of Goncalo de Sousa Amaral in that torture is once again confirmed;
Goncalo de Sousa Amaral was condemn to pay all the court expenses;
since the Public Prosecutor also asked for the non-guilty verdict, no more appeals are possible!
No, he didn't.
No, it wasn't.
Lie. It wasn't.
Not confirmed anywhere else.
Not confirmed anywhere else.

Where, exactly, did you say you saw this, Panda?

It is a Blog "the Hounding of the McCanns " which I had saved for some reason and Tony Winter (LA? ) is the Author. When
I saw the link to court I assume it was genuine .

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/ .....this was the info I had kept , but when I checked it out to see why I had kept it, the current topic
was displayed.

Why do you think that Tony Winter is also called "crazytony" and "urcrazytoo"?

Iris wrote:Why do you think that Tony Winter is also called "crazytony" and "urcrazytoo"?

I don't know anything about him but remember the name and face and thought he was outed as Laffin Assassin. so what you are saying is the tv1 ref
is a fake and there was no transcript of the Trial?

Panda wrote:

Iris wrote:Why do you think that Tony Winter is also called "crazytony" and "urcrazytoo"?

I don't know anything about him but remember the name and face and thought he was outed as Laffin Assassin. so what you are saying is the tv1 ref
is a fake and there was no transcript of the Trial?

Crazy Tony is most definitely not Laffin Asassin, and the "transcript" is bigotted rubbish. There is a reliable translation by Ines on the other thread.

Iris wrote:

Panda wrote:

Iris wrote:Why do you think that Tony Winter is also called "crazytony" and "urcrazytoo"?

I don't know anything about him but remember the name and face and thought he was outed as Laffin Assassin. so what you are saying is the tv1 ref
is a fake and there was no transcript of the Trial?

Crazy Tony is most definitely not Laffin Asassin, and the "transcript" is bigotted rubbish. There is a reliable translation by Ines on the other thread.

Yes, I just read it, a bit ambiguous saying there was no evidence that Amaral had witnessed torture so how come he had to pay the Court costs ?

Is "crazy tony" MF then? I think I might have read something about this on HLM which when I read it and looked at the photo I remember thinking Tony
looked nothing like my impression of LA.

I hope you wiped your feet on the way out after visiting that blog Panda

chrissie wrote:I hope you wiped your feet on the way out after visiting that blog Panda

Hi chrissie , as everyone knows I am not au fait with all these characters and it was scrolling through my "saved" list to see what I could delete that
I came across this and seeing today's date thought it deserved an airing. Anyway, the face is very familiar so I shall have to ask one of my researchers
LOL

Right, got it, Sean Hyland is LA and the guy in the trilby hat is him, I thought it was his article but obviously it is Tony.s........my mistake.

Panda wrote:

Right, got it, Sean Hyland is LA and the guy in the trilby hat is him, I thought it was his article but obviously it is Tony.s........my mistake.

Not a bit how I imagined LA to look.

dazedandconfused wrote:

Panda wrote:

Right, got it, Sean Hyland is LA and the guy in the trilby hat is him, I thought it was his article but obviously it is Tony.s........my mistake.

Not a bit how I imagined LA to look.

Nor me dazesandconfused He is definitely an oddball, never really joined in a discussion on anything .

dazedandconfused wrote:

Panda wrote:

Right, got it, Sean Hyland is LA and the guy in the trilby hat is him, I thought it was his article but obviously it is Tony.s........my mistake.

Not a bit how I imagined LA to look.

Nor me i've laughed with him ,at him and crossed swords with him , what a surprise.

I bet none of us look like others imagine but I too was surprised at seeing LA...who looks like a bar room brawler, but is/was quite an intellectual.

Panda wrote:

I bet none of us look like others imagine but I too was surprised at seeing LA...who looks like a bar room brawler, but is/was quite an intellectual.

Hi panda is'nt it strange how we form a picture in our minds of how we think folks look , and we are so wrong so many times.

chrissie wrote:I hope you wiped your feet on the way out after visiting that blog Panda

I have just ventured there for the first and last time! I thought I'd heard of all the rabid pro sites but this one had passed me by. I know we shouldn't mock the afflicted but it's proving difficult in the case of the writer of this blog.

halfamo wrote:

Panda wrote:

I bet none of us look like others imagine but I too was surprised at seeing LA...who looks like a bar room brawler, but is/was quite an intellectual.

Hi panda is'nt it strange how we form a picture in our minds of how we think folks look , and we are so wrong so many times.

Yes, halfamo, and I'm sure some who describe themselves as female are male and vice versa After all this time I still think it strange "talking"
into thin air and if I live to be 100 I will never understand how a computer works or how to find stuff, include a photo etc.. A while ago I was having
trouble with the computer, phoned my internet provider and he tried various remedies to no avail. Then he said "have you cleared your cookies?" I
said "Pardon?not having a clue what he meant......we both had a good laugh.

At least you didn't say something like what's the state of my biscuit tin got to do with it, or at least I hope you didn't!

Not Born Yesterday wrote:At least you didn't say something like what's the state of my biscuit tin got to do with it, or at least I hope you didn't!

NAH, I guessed it was computerspeak, you need another dictionary for that!!

Not Born Yesterday wrote:At least you didn't say something like what's the state of my biscuit tin got to do with it, or at least I hope you didn't!

Errrrmmmm, at the fear of appearing a numpty, what are cookies?

Bobsy wrote:

Not Born Yesterday wrote:At least you didn't say something like what's the state of my biscuit tin got to do with it, or at least I hope you didn't!

Errrrmmmm, at the fear of appearing a numpty, what are cookies?

THERE ARE PIECES OF INFORMATION STORED ON YOUR COMPUTER CONCERNIN WHAT YOU HAVE VISITED/ADVERTISED