VIDEO: Kate & Gerry McCann - BBC Andrew Marr Show - Feb 17th 2013

Kate & Gerry McCann - BBC Andrew Marr Show - Feb 17th 2013



Discussion at

kate and gerry show.
https://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t22825-kate-and-gerry-show

Grieving mother...madeleines not dead, is she.

kitti wrote:Grieving mother...madeleines not dead, is she.

Not for another fifteen months.

Transparency lol....good grief.



MPs want to implement rules the same as the Mccanns....off course MPs do... Wouldn't off heard off the fraud some MPs were doing with regard to expenses ,would we.

Kate Mccanns with regards phoning the editor and the sighting ......now the public don't believe a word off these so called sightings...will she be getting a pat on the back and saying that SHE stopped the reporting off these sightings from now on because he had a word with the editor?

kitti wrote:Kate Mccanns with regards phoning the editor and the sighting ......now the public don't believe a word off these so called sightings...will she be getting a pat on the back and saying that SHE stopped the reporting off these sightings from now on because he had a word with the editor?

She could be now harming 'the search'...i expect the same treatment from Carter Ruck...letter on way to Rothley Towers

Funny how a week ago Joanna put a bit In about....'no more sightings' and here we are...Kate Mccann stating about the 'sighting'...bit late Kate...we already know it will stop but you didn't prompt it dear

some of their concerns raised are interesting... too close to politicians.... meeting in secret and no details published, concerns about Madeleine and her safety, details published which could harm her, total lack of transparency.

these are all phrases which have been used variously to describe the mccanns meeting with the tapas in a hotel, concerns that Madeleine might be harmed by publishing details of her eye, and the fund. such irony. ju

tanszi wrote:some of their concerns raised are interesting... too close to politicians.... meeting in secret and no details published, concerns about Madeleine and her safety, details published which could harm her, total lack of transparency.

these are all phrases which have been used variously to describe the mccanns meeting with the tapas in a hotel, concerns that Madeleine might be harmed by publishing details of her eye, and the fund. such irony. ju

Its like they think history has been erased & that no one has a memory,i almost feel embarrassed for them...almost

"None of that Bolshie talk, here, Walker"

They don't want any reporting about them, so they hire God knows how many spokespeople! How much did they pay Justine? (the first one, can't remember her last name)

fred wrote: ............... can't remember her last name)

Time

Most of what was said by Gerry McCann on the Andrew Marr show was what you might have expected from a Hacked Off supporter... wanting the press to be neutered, and that by law... the only bit of Leveson not likely to be implemented. He rattled on as expected. The bits of the interview that interested me were four.

1 - Eddie Mair asked him what his 'preferred' solution to press regulation would be, given that he had said full implementation of Leveson with underpinning by the law was the LEAST that should be done. If GM could have a free hand, what would he propose that was better than that? GM then backtracked and said full implementation of Leveson would do. Mair pressed him and asked the question again, but he repeated his former reply.

2 - At one point KM broke in, bursting out in indignation that a newspaper, she did not say which, had said they had kept Madeleine's body in a freezer. The comment was just left in the air... presumably as it was not part of the discussion in hand.

3 - Speaking of 'hand'... that was the third thing that interested me. Half way through and KM's hand was splayed open and pressing down hard on GM's nearest knee... for restraint?... for reassurance?... for support for him?... for support for her?.... I don't know. It certainly looked odd.

4 - The only bit of new 'content' was when KM again furiously spoke out against an unnamed paper about a recent unspecified report about her daughter. (?The NZ sighting?... I'm guessing, she didn't say.) She gave the impression that she thought the particular report was detrimental to the search for her daughter, and that 'the Met' agreed with her. She said she wrote to the editor to complain about it, and was astounded to get in reply a letter suggesting that the newspaper knew best how to further the interests of missing children.

Well... there you go...

comperedna wrote:

Well... there you go...

The Marr Mair the merrier.

Public sentiment is no longer in their favour, either through over-exposure and self-promotion or because more and more people simply do not believe them.

Who was listening to Kate and Gerry McCann?
BY JON CLEMENTS ON FEB 18, 09 02:55 PM IN MCCANN


A little reminder about this column which appeared in 2009...


A few days ago I received an interesting letter from Leicestershire police about the Madeleine McCann investigation.

I had asked them, in July, if they had got any warrants (under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act) to use surveillance powers - such as phone tapping and email interception on behalf of the Portuguese police.
The force initially stalled saying it needed to "consult other Agencies" before replying.

After a six month delay, Leicestershire has now claimed it is exempt from Freedom of Information laws in this case due to "national security".

I've put in dozens of FoI requests to police forces over the years, some you get and some you don't but "national security" is a new one on me.

To make matters even murkier, Leicestershire claimed a second exemption because the information I requested could relate to "the Security bodies".

A quick look at the FoI Act reveals "Security bodies" are MI5, MI6, GCHQ (pictured above), special forces (such as the SAS) and the Serious Organised Crime Agency.

Hmm.

Despite claiming these exemptions, Leicestershire seem at pains to neither confirm nor deny they hold any information relevant to my request anyway.

Check out (slowly I suggest) the tortuous conclusion to the three page letter explaining their stance.

"It is our decision that the Leicestershire Constabulary must maintain a position of neither confirming nor denying that any relevant information is held and that this response, which neither confirms nor denies that information is held, should not be taken as conclusive evidence that the information you have requested exists or does not exist".

Thanks, but I think that is a rather long-winded way of saying Foxtrot Oscar.

However, it does beg the question just who was bugging the McCanns after they returned from Praia da Luz?

And what has the answer got to do with national security?

Ho ho ho

Thanks HiDeHo.....you ARE clever .
This is a quote from comparedna
- Speaking of 'hand'... that was the third thing that interested me. Half way through and KM's hand was splayed open and pressing down hard on GM's nearest knee... for restraint?... for reassurance?... for support for him?... for support for her?.... I don't know. It certainly looked odd.
The hand was the one thing that interested me as well. The black line across the video meant you couldn;t see Kate's hand when it was in her lap but when she was waving it about it looked like she didn't have her wedding ring on, anyone else notice this.?

Many thanks to HiDeHo for this latest video.

Did I actually hear the grieving mother say, "The general public need to know what happened"; - I do agree with that!!!!

But we do know what happened: Madeleine was left at considerable risk owing to the barmy ideas of parental responsibility exercised by Healy, McCann and others whilst they enjoyed "me" time (It was their holiday too).

Whatever one might conclude from the available intelligence (key amongst which is the conclusions of the investigating Police Force), the chances of an accident, a misadventure or (dare I say it) of Abduction were greatly enhanced.

That's it, in a nutshell.

Wholly inexcusable and utterly indefensible.

[quote="comperedna"]Most of what was said by Gerry McCann on the Andrew Marr show was what you might have expected from a Hacked Off supporter... wanting the press to be neutered, and that by law... the only bit of Leveson not likely to be implemented. He rattled on as expected. The bits of the interview that interested me were four. ...
2 - At one point KM broke in, bursting out in indignation that a newspaper, she did not say which, had said they had kept Madeleine's body in a freezer. The comment was just left in the air... presumably as it was not part of the discussion in hand."

.....................................................................................................................................................................
As if this fake indignation ( for Kate's coldness rules out any kind of spontaneus indignation), was made to enforce in the mind of people that this ( Madeleine's body kept in a freezer by them) couldn't have possibly happened.Wasn'it Amaral's hypothesis in his book?

[quote="frencheuropean"]

comperedna wrote:Most of what was said by Gerry McCann on the Andrew Marr show was what you might have expected from a Hacked Off supporter... wanting the press to be neutered, and that by law... the only bit of Leveson not likely to be implemented. He rattled on as expected. The bits of the interview that interested me were four. ...
2 - At one point KM broke in, bursting out in indignation that a newspaper, she did not say which, had said they had kept Madeleine's body in a freezer. The comment was just left in the air... presumably as it was not part of the discussion in hand."

.....................................................................................................................................................................
As if this fake indignation ( for Kate's coldness rules out any kind of spontaneus indignation), was made to enforce in the mind of people that this ( Madeleine's body kept in a freezer by them) couldn't have possibly happened.Wasn'it Amaral's hypothesis in his book?

i believe it was -- wonder what the other tapas thought of that little outburst

I wonder if Kate is contemplating a move to Tunbridge Wells: She does seem to be permanently outraged.


(With apologies to the good burghers of said infamous Town!)

HiDeHo wrote:Kate & Gerry McCann - BBC Andrew Marr Show - Feb 17th 2013



Discussion at

kate and gerry show.
https://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t22825-kate-and-gerry-show

Thank you for posting hat.

Panda wrote:Thanks HiDeHo.....you ARE clever .
This is a quote from comparedna
- Speaking of 'hand'... that was the third thing that interested me. Half way through and KM's hand was splayed open and pressing down hard on GM's nearest knee... for restraint?... for reassurance?... for support for him?... for support for her?.... I don't know. It certainly looked odd.
The hand was the one thing that interested me as well. The black line across the video meant you couldn;t see Kate's hand when it was in her lap but when she was waving it about it looked like she didn't have her wedding ring on, anyone else notice this.?

Kate did appear to be wearing a ring, however I don't think that Gerry was.

HiDeHo wrote:

Panda wrote:Thanks HiDeHo.....you ARE clever .
This is a quote from comparedna
- Speaking of 'hand'... that was the third thing that interested me. Half way through and KM's hand was splayed open and pressing down hard on GM's nearest knee... for restraint?... for reassurance?... for support for him?... for support for her?.... I don't know. It certainly looked odd.
The hand was the one thing that interested me as well. The black line across the video meant you couldn;t see Kate's hand when it was in her lap but when she was waving it about it looked like she didn't have her wedding ring on, anyone else notice this.?

Kate did appear to be wearing a ring, however I don't think that Gerry was.

Well done HiDeHo I can't remember if Gerry ever wore a Wedding ring . Notice how Kate had her hand on his thigh to show togetherness......gone are the days when they held hands I think. What happens next in this Saga I wonder. I bet all this will detract from sales of her new book due out in April or May. Apparently it is to be her last and no doubt will be 29 pages tacked on to the last book.