Diana's Final Obsession
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
Diana's Final Obsession
Panda Sun 4 Aug - 13:08
Diana, Princess of Wales: The affair of the heart that was her final obsession
A new film focuses on Diana's doomed relationship with her surgeon lover, Hasnat Khan
Diana, Princess of Wales was keen to marry Dr Hasnat Khan Photo: REX/PA
By Andrew Morton
6:49PM BST 03 Aug 2013
54 Comments
He was hardly the stuff of a Mills & Boon romantic hero. Dr Hasnat Khan, a heart surgeon, was running to fat, smoked a packet of cigarettes a day, and had a passion for Carlsberg, Kentucky Fried Chicken and late-night jazz at Ronnie Scott’s. Not quite an advert for healthy living.
Yet the moment Diana, Princess of Wales, set eyes on the Pakistan-born surgeon, her heart skipped a beat.
“He’s drop-dead gorgeous,” she told Oonagh Toffolo, her friend and acupuncturist, after their brief encounter at the Royal Brompton Hospital in west London, where she was visiting Oonagh’s husband, Joe, following triple-bypass surgery.
Oonagh later told me: “I would say it was love at first sight. She was so overwhelmed, it can only have been a soul encounter.”
The self-appointed queen of hearts had found her king.
Related Articles
Diana and Carole would be leaders of the 'glammies’
23 Jul 2013
Princess Diana's Dresses, Channel 4, review
17 Jul 2013
Princess Diana documentary to lift the lid on her most iconic dresses
04 Jul 2013
Royal baby: Duke and Duchess of Cambridge register birth of Prince George
02 Aug 2013
Fashion Rules: Inside the wardrobes of royal icons
03 Jul 2013
Chopard on decking out Naomi Watts as Diana
03 Jul 2013
As with the first time she met Prince Charles, when he was mourning the loss of his great-uncle, Lord “Dickie” Mountbatten, their fleeting meeting in September 1995 brought out her strong mothering instincts.
Shortly afterwards, this highly unlikely couple embarked on what would be Diana’s last love affair. Their first date was a trip to Stratford-upon-Avon to visit his aunt and uncle, and to pick up some books. “I did not think for one minute that she would say yes, but I asked her to come with me,” Dr Khan later recalled. “After this, our friendship turned into a relationship.”
Their intense but largely secret two-year romance is now the subject of a new film by the director Oliver Hirschbiegel, Diana, out next month. Naomi Watts, the Oscar-nominated actress, plays the love-struck princess, while the rakishly handsome Naveen Andrews, star of the television series Lost, is the publicity-shy NHS doctor.
The film — the first to deal directly with the last two years of her life — is the latest example of Hollywood’s recent love affair with all things royal (think Peter Morgan’s brilliantly observed 2006 film The Queen, and 2010’s The King’s Speech). In the past, films about Diana have been low-budget, made-for-television affairs that have had scant critical recognition. Given the tragic drama of her life, it is surprising that so few have been tempted to interpret her story.
The movie has propelled Diana back on to the cover of Vanity Fair — the fifth time since her death in August 1997. Her surgeon boyfriend also, reluctantly, returns to the limelight.
This is in contrast with the suffocating secrecy surrounding their affair. They spent their time either in Kensington Palace, where Diana lived alone, or in Dr Khan’s tiny one-bedroom Chelsea flat, where she would perform housewifely duties for the doctor, who worked 90-hour weeks, doing the washing-up and his laundry.
Diana, then 35, frequently wore a wig and spectacles as a disguise, and once climbed out of a ground-floor window when she visited him at Harefield Hospital in west London to avoid discovery. At other times, she risked all to please the man whom she described as having “dark-brown velvet eyes that you could just sink into”.
Shortly after her birthday in July 1996, the Princess apparently met her lover wearing a fur coat, a pair of sapphire-and-diamond earrings — and nothing more apart from a big smile.
As with her other relationships, Diana threw herself into his life and interests. When she visited Pakistan on a humanitarian mission in 1996, for instance, she made a point of visiting his parents for tea. She even studied the medical textbook, Gray’s Anatomy, so that she could more clearly understand his work.
Her romance coincided with a time when her life was beginning to make sense. She was in secret discussions with Tony Blair, then leader of the opposition, about becoming a roving ambassador; her divorce was finalised on July 4 1996; and she had a new sense of purpose, symbolised by her decision to sell her collection of gowns at a charity auction in New York.
After meeting Dr Khan’s parents, Diana was talking about marriage, children and a new life together in Australia, South Africa or Pakistan. She kept his picture by her bedside, read the Koran each night and introduced Dr Khan to her children.
As she dreamt of becoming plain Mrs Khan, she talked, too, of having a “beautiful brown daughter” whom she would call Allegra, a name suggested by her friend Annabel Goldsmith. She believed that she and Hasnat could open hospitals for children with heart conditions or hospices on an international scale. “She felt that Hasnat and she could change the world,” recalls Oonagh Toffolo.
Jemima Khan, the socialite, told Vanity Fair that one reason they became friends was her own marriage to Imran Khan, the Pakistani cricketer, now politician.
“Diana was madly in love with Hasnat Khan [a distant cousin from the traditional Pashtun tribe] and wanted to marry him, even if that meant living in Pakistan,” she explained.
While the prospect of making a new life with him was a tantalising vision, her single-minded focus was unnerving for the unassuming surgeon. She was intense and obsessive, and her neediness was as demanding as it was compulsive.
A certain “Dr Armani” — that is to say, the princess — would bombard Dr Khan with texts and calls while he was on duty.
“She was besotted with him, and I think his rather reserved manner made it worse,” recalls Simone Simmons, a spiritualist friend.
She would follow him on his rounds and even watched him perform heart operations, on one occasion allowing herself to be filmed in the operating theatre. This lead to widespread ridicule from the media, who were baffled by her behaviour.
As the man she described as “Mr Wonderful” absorbed the implications of life in the media spotlight, he started to have serious doubts, especially when the press began contacting former girlfriends and professors from his medical school.
Debbie Frank, her friend and astrologer, recalls: “He wasn’t at all interested in being a celebrity and would get annoyed if things came out in the press about them, and he would blame her.”
Diffident and unassuming, he would prefer to sip a pint of Guinness in his local pub, the Anglesea Arms in South Kensington, than appear on the front pages.
While Dr Khan found no allure in the princess as a celebrity, the altruistic, caring woman who was unafraid to take on difficult causes was quite another matter. This was the tension at the heart of their relationship, the conflict between her public persona that attracted unwanted attention, and the private princess.
It was becoming clear that Dr Khan felt constrained by the curse of celebrity, the conflicting demands of the princess and his career, and by their cultural and religious divide. As he told his father, Abdul Rasheed Khan, she was from Venus, he was from Mars.
More than that, he had a fear of commitment, having already been engaged twice and calling off the nuptials at a late stage. (His eventual marriage in 2006 lasted barely 18 months.) “Everyone knew she wanted to marry him,” Dr Khan’s mother, Nahid, told the Pakistan’s Daily Times, “but he felt that a marriage would be impossible.”
Ultimately, it was the other two men in her life, William and Harry, who became the biggest stumbling block. Dr Khan realised that if they married, they would have to live in Pakistan to have any chance of a normal life together. There was no way the Queen or Prince Charles would have allowed the heir to the throne to be raised abroad for any length of time.
Dr Khan said last year: “She couldn’t have lived in Pakistan at that time — her children were too young [William was 14 and Harry 12]. She couldn’t live in two places at the same time, spending a month here or a week there.”
They began to drift apart, friends saying that the relationship ended around the summer of 1997. He later recalled: “I think mainly the problem was that even after two years, the relationship wasn’t leading to a meaningful progression or conclusion, and that was the main stress on both of us. Everyone wants a relationship to be going somewhere.”
Just weeks before her death, Dr Khan met the princess for the final time at Battersea Park in south London. She said her final farewells. “It was not at all happy,” Dr Khan says, with typical understatement, adding: “She was not her normal self.” He suspected that she was now with Dodi Fayed.
Some of her friends, such as Simone Simmons and Rosa Monckton, then head of Tiffany & Co, the jewellers, believe that her subsequent courtship of Dodi was a deliberate move to make Dr Khan jealous and encourage him to change his mind about living in Pakistan.
During that last summer she looked sleek and glamorous, posing on the deck of the Fayeds’ private yacht or diving into the Mediterranean wearing a sexy one-piece bathing suit. Her publicity-seeking behaviour was, say her girlfriends, targeted at just one man: Hasnat Khan.
The Princess was still on the doctor’s mind, too; he tried telephoning her on August 31 1997, the night she died, not knowing that she had changed her number.
Of course, we will never know her real motives. It is part of the mystery that remains Diana. Certainly her romance with Dr Khan was highly unusual, although she had long since thrown away the handbook on how to be a conventional princess.
As for Dr Khan, he now works as a heart surgeon at a private clinic in Basildon, Essex, while quietly building a charitable cardiology unit in Pakistan. The £1 million unit is in the town of Badlote, near his family home. His aim is to provide free care for poor children in this rural region, something the princess and the doctor talked of nearly two decades ago.
Diana would have approved.
Andrew Morton’s chronicle of the princess’s last years, 'Diana: In Pursuit of Love’ (Michael O’Mara, £9.99) is published next month
A new film focuses on Diana's doomed relationship with her surgeon lover, Hasnat Khan
Diana, Princess of Wales was keen to marry Dr Hasnat Khan Photo: REX/PA
By Andrew Morton
6:49PM BST 03 Aug 2013
54 Comments
He was hardly the stuff of a Mills & Boon romantic hero. Dr Hasnat Khan, a heart surgeon, was running to fat, smoked a packet of cigarettes a day, and had a passion for Carlsberg, Kentucky Fried Chicken and late-night jazz at Ronnie Scott’s. Not quite an advert for healthy living.
Yet the moment Diana, Princess of Wales, set eyes on the Pakistan-born surgeon, her heart skipped a beat.
“He’s drop-dead gorgeous,” she told Oonagh Toffolo, her friend and acupuncturist, after their brief encounter at the Royal Brompton Hospital in west London, where she was visiting Oonagh’s husband, Joe, following triple-bypass surgery.
Oonagh later told me: “I would say it was love at first sight. She was so overwhelmed, it can only have been a soul encounter.”
The self-appointed queen of hearts had found her king.
Related Articles
Diana and Carole would be leaders of the 'glammies’
23 Jul 2013
Princess Diana's Dresses, Channel 4, review
17 Jul 2013
Princess Diana documentary to lift the lid on her most iconic dresses
04 Jul 2013
Royal baby: Duke and Duchess of Cambridge register birth of Prince George
02 Aug 2013
Fashion Rules: Inside the wardrobes of royal icons
03 Jul 2013
Chopard on decking out Naomi Watts as Diana
03 Jul 2013
As with the first time she met Prince Charles, when he was mourning the loss of his great-uncle, Lord “Dickie” Mountbatten, their fleeting meeting in September 1995 brought out her strong mothering instincts.
Shortly afterwards, this highly unlikely couple embarked on what would be Diana’s last love affair. Their first date was a trip to Stratford-upon-Avon to visit his aunt and uncle, and to pick up some books. “I did not think for one minute that she would say yes, but I asked her to come with me,” Dr Khan later recalled. “After this, our friendship turned into a relationship.”
Their intense but largely secret two-year romance is now the subject of a new film by the director Oliver Hirschbiegel, Diana, out next month. Naomi Watts, the Oscar-nominated actress, plays the love-struck princess, while the rakishly handsome Naveen Andrews, star of the television series Lost, is the publicity-shy NHS doctor.
The film — the first to deal directly with the last two years of her life — is the latest example of Hollywood’s recent love affair with all things royal (think Peter Morgan’s brilliantly observed 2006 film The Queen, and 2010’s The King’s Speech). In the past, films about Diana have been low-budget, made-for-television affairs that have had scant critical recognition. Given the tragic drama of her life, it is surprising that so few have been tempted to interpret her story.
The movie has propelled Diana back on to the cover of Vanity Fair — the fifth time since her death in August 1997. Her surgeon boyfriend also, reluctantly, returns to the limelight.
This is in contrast with the suffocating secrecy surrounding their affair. They spent their time either in Kensington Palace, where Diana lived alone, or in Dr Khan’s tiny one-bedroom Chelsea flat, where she would perform housewifely duties for the doctor, who worked 90-hour weeks, doing the washing-up and his laundry.
Diana, then 35, frequently wore a wig and spectacles as a disguise, and once climbed out of a ground-floor window when she visited him at Harefield Hospital in west London to avoid discovery. At other times, she risked all to please the man whom she described as having “dark-brown velvet eyes that you could just sink into”.
Shortly after her birthday in July 1996, the Princess apparently met her lover wearing a fur coat, a pair of sapphire-and-diamond earrings — and nothing more apart from a big smile.
As with her other relationships, Diana threw herself into his life and interests. When she visited Pakistan on a humanitarian mission in 1996, for instance, she made a point of visiting his parents for tea. She even studied the medical textbook, Gray’s Anatomy, so that she could more clearly understand his work.
Her romance coincided with a time when her life was beginning to make sense. She was in secret discussions with Tony Blair, then leader of the opposition, about becoming a roving ambassador; her divorce was finalised on July 4 1996; and she had a new sense of purpose, symbolised by her decision to sell her collection of gowns at a charity auction in New York.
After meeting Dr Khan’s parents, Diana was talking about marriage, children and a new life together in Australia, South Africa or Pakistan. She kept his picture by her bedside, read the Koran each night and introduced Dr Khan to her children.
As she dreamt of becoming plain Mrs Khan, she talked, too, of having a “beautiful brown daughter” whom she would call Allegra, a name suggested by her friend Annabel Goldsmith. She believed that she and Hasnat could open hospitals for children with heart conditions or hospices on an international scale. “She felt that Hasnat and she could change the world,” recalls Oonagh Toffolo.
Jemima Khan, the socialite, told Vanity Fair that one reason they became friends was her own marriage to Imran Khan, the Pakistani cricketer, now politician.
“Diana was madly in love with Hasnat Khan [a distant cousin from the traditional Pashtun tribe] and wanted to marry him, even if that meant living in Pakistan,” she explained.
While the prospect of making a new life with him was a tantalising vision, her single-minded focus was unnerving for the unassuming surgeon. She was intense and obsessive, and her neediness was as demanding as it was compulsive.
A certain “Dr Armani” — that is to say, the princess — would bombard Dr Khan with texts and calls while he was on duty.
“She was besotted with him, and I think his rather reserved manner made it worse,” recalls Simone Simmons, a spiritualist friend.
She would follow him on his rounds and even watched him perform heart operations, on one occasion allowing herself to be filmed in the operating theatre. This lead to widespread ridicule from the media, who were baffled by her behaviour.
As the man she described as “Mr Wonderful” absorbed the implications of life in the media spotlight, he started to have serious doubts, especially when the press began contacting former girlfriends and professors from his medical school.
Debbie Frank, her friend and astrologer, recalls: “He wasn’t at all interested in being a celebrity and would get annoyed if things came out in the press about them, and he would blame her.”
Diffident and unassuming, he would prefer to sip a pint of Guinness in his local pub, the Anglesea Arms in South Kensington, than appear on the front pages.
While Dr Khan found no allure in the princess as a celebrity, the altruistic, caring woman who was unafraid to take on difficult causes was quite another matter. This was the tension at the heart of their relationship, the conflict between her public persona that attracted unwanted attention, and the private princess.
It was becoming clear that Dr Khan felt constrained by the curse of celebrity, the conflicting demands of the princess and his career, and by their cultural and religious divide. As he told his father, Abdul Rasheed Khan, she was from Venus, he was from Mars.
More than that, he had a fear of commitment, having already been engaged twice and calling off the nuptials at a late stage. (His eventual marriage in 2006 lasted barely 18 months.) “Everyone knew she wanted to marry him,” Dr Khan’s mother, Nahid, told the Pakistan’s Daily Times, “but he felt that a marriage would be impossible.”
Ultimately, it was the other two men in her life, William and Harry, who became the biggest stumbling block. Dr Khan realised that if they married, they would have to live in Pakistan to have any chance of a normal life together. There was no way the Queen or Prince Charles would have allowed the heir to the throne to be raised abroad for any length of time.
Dr Khan said last year: “She couldn’t have lived in Pakistan at that time — her children were too young [William was 14 and Harry 12]. She couldn’t live in two places at the same time, spending a month here or a week there.”
They began to drift apart, friends saying that the relationship ended around the summer of 1997. He later recalled: “I think mainly the problem was that even after two years, the relationship wasn’t leading to a meaningful progression or conclusion, and that was the main stress on both of us. Everyone wants a relationship to be going somewhere.”
Just weeks before her death, Dr Khan met the princess for the final time at Battersea Park in south London. She said her final farewells. “It was not at all happy,” Dr Khan says, with typical understatement, adding: “She was not her normal self.” He suspected that she was now with Dodi Fayed.
Some of her friends, such as Simone Simmons and Rosa Monckton, then head of Tiffany & Co, the jewellers, believe that her subsequent courtship of Dodi was a deliberate move to make Dr Khan jealous and encourage him to change his mind about living in Pakistan.
During that last summer she looked sleek and glamorous, posing on the deck of the Fayeds’ private yacht or diving into the Mediterranean wearing a sexy one-piece bathing suit. Her publicity-seeking behaviour was, say her girlfriends, targeted at just one man: Hasnat Khan.
The Princess was still on the doctor’s mind, too; he tried telephoning her on August 31 1997, the night she died, not knowing that she had changed her number.
Of course, we will never know her real motives. It is part of the mystery that remains Diana. Certainly her romance with Dr Khan was highly unusual, although she had long since thrown away the handbook on how to be a conventional princess.
As for Dr Khan, he now works as a heart surgeon at a private clinic in Basildon, Essex, while quietly building a charitable cardiology unit in Pakistan. The £1 million unit is in the town of Badlote, near his family home. His aim is to provide free care for poor children in this rural region, something the princess and the doctor talked of nearly two decades ago.
Diana would have approved.
Andrew Morton’s chronicle of the princess’s last years, 'Diana: In Pursuit of Love’ (Michael O’Mara, £9.99) is published next month
Panda- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 67
Location : Wales
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-27
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Guest Sun 4 Aug - 13:16
Ye gods, this is 
stuff!
Andrew Morton must have run out of money to come up with this.
I'm not sure what would be worse - having a choice of only his book or Kate's to read.
stuff!Andrew Morton must have run out of money to come up with this.
I'm not sure what would be worse - having a choice of only his book or Kate's to read.
Guest- Guest
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Panda Sun 4 Aug - 13:42
Not Born Yesterday wrote:Ye gods, this is
Andrew Morton must have run out of money to come up with this.
I'm not sure what would be worse - having a choice of only his book or Kate's to read.
Diana was I think lonely after the Divorce , had a few flings and this is the one Guy she couldn't have . Bad taste publishing it now when William and Kate are celebrating the birth of George.
Panda- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 67
Location : Wales
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-27
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Krisy22 Sun 4 Aug - 13:53
I really wish they would just let Diana rest in peace now. ...plus William and Harry have been through enough sadness.
Its time for joy now ..not dragging up this rubbish.
Its time for joy now ..not dragging up this rubbish.
Krisy22- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 3382
Location : good old Oxfordshire no goats... lots of RAIN....
Warning :
Registration date : 2008-07-27
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Panda Sun 4 Aug - 14:29
Krisy22 wrote:I really wish they would just let Diana rest in peace now. ...plus William and Harry have been through enough sadness.
Its time for joy now ..not dragging up this rubbish.
Hi Krisy22, I would like to think it would be banned in the U.K. , but that is wishful thinking. However, now that Royalty is so popular I don't think many people will buy.
Panda- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 67
Location : Wales
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-27
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Krisy22 Sun 4 Aug - 14:44
Krisy22 wrote:I really wish they would just let Diana rest in peace now. ...plus William and Harry have been through enough sadness.
Its time for joy now ..not dragging up this rubbish.
Hi Krisy22, I would like to think it would be banned in the U.K. , but that is wishful thinking. However, now that Royalty is so popular I don't think many people will buy.
Hi Panda ,
Yes I reckon you could be right about people not buying the book. The young royals are such a breath of fresh air ..so natural ..the best we have had for donkeys years.
It would be nice to think that the book will be a flop ...give those youngsters a chance at putting some fresh air in The House of Windsor ..I say.
Krisy22- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 3382
Location : good old Oxfordshire no goats... lots of RAIN....
Warning :
Registration date : 2008-07-27
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Guest Sun 4 Aug - 22:31
I wonder if Hasnat Khan has agreed to this book being published.
He has never spoken publicly about Diana so must appreciate his privacy and it's hard to imagine that he would want to be thrust into the limelight now.
He has never spoken publicly about Diana so must appreciate his privacy and it's hard to imagine that he would want to be thrust into the limelight now.
Guest- Guest
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Guest Sat 17 Aug - 20:19
Rather belatedly I've realised that the book was published in 2004. How it is described as yet to be published, I don't know.
http://www.amazon.com/Diana-Pursuit-Love-Andrew-Morton/dp/1843170841
http://www.amazon.com/Diana-Pursuit-Love-Andrew-Morton/dp/1843170841
Guest- Guest
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Guest Tue 20 Aug - 18:30
Here's a trailer for the film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axLcfpj7xeU
How we will curb our impatience until it's released on 10th October I don't know!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axLcfpj7xeU
How we will curb our impatience until it's released on 10th October I don't know!
Guest- Guest
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Guest Fri 6 Sep - 9:51
What a surprise, the initial reviews are dreadful.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/watts-attends-diana-premiere-005814651.htm
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/watts-attends-diana-premiere-005814651.htm
Guest- Guest
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Panda Sun 8 Sep - 10:48
Diana, review
David Gritten reviews Diana, the new biopic starring Naomi Watts.
2
Naomi Watts and Naveen Andrews star in the new biopic, Diana Photo: Alamy
By David Gritten
11:25PM BST 05 Sep 2013
Now here’s a film that trades on dealing with a relatively under-reported facet of Princess Diana’s eventful life: her romance with London-based Pakistani heart surgeon Hasnat Khan. And so it does, for much of its running time.
Yet it starts with a familiar sequence and repeats it at the end: on that awful night in 1997, in that wretched Paris hotel, Naomi Watts as Diana accompanies Dodi Fayed and security guards down a corridor into that tiny lift – to her death minutes later. Thus do the makers of Diana betray their intentions: the film is bookended by a redundant piece of lurid sensationalism.
In between it’s more pedestrian. Oliver Hirschbiegel, who directed the estimable Downfall, serves up a leaden account of how Diana met Khan, and how their stop-start two-year romance alternately blossomed and stumbled.
Watts makes a decent fist of playing Diana – she wears the clothes well (especially the glamorous ones) and the hair looks first-rate. But though she replicates Diana’s body language attentively (notably in the re-creation of her famous grilling by Martin Bashir, there’s something missing: the Princess’s wounded, doe-eyed gaze.
Related Articles
Diana: What you need to know about the film
05 Sep 2013
Diana: watch a scene from the film
05 Sep 2013
Diana film is 'completely wrong', says former lover
25 Aug 2013
'Diana' - straight to DVD
06 Sep 2013
Watts 'couldn't say no' to Diana role
05 Sep 2013
Watts stars at Diana world premiere
06 Sep 2013
Naveen Andrews makes a solid, stubborn Khan, and he’s given nice character touches: a jazz fan, he tells Diana to throw away the rule book and ‘improvise’ her life after the royal family closes ranks against her.
The major problem, predictably, comes with the dialogue, which involves characters telling each other things they already know. “I am a heart surgeon!” declares heart surgeon Khan. On another occasion: “You’re the most famous woman in the world.” Yes, we get it.
Adapted from Kate Snell’s book Diana: Her Last Love, first published in 2000, the film invents events in the couple’s courtship. Some of these beggar belief: would Diana, arriving at Khan’s empty, untidy flat, have started vacuuming frantically? Would the couple have walked around London parks so openly, without security protection?
Still, Stephen Jeffreys’ script touches most of the bases in Diana’s later life: her complicity with royal correspondents and a few favoured paparazzi: her ability to be calculating yet still seem like a lonely, lost innocent; her sincere support for victims of land mines; and her affection for her two sons who, judging from this account, she rarely saw. (In a welcome touch of restraint, the young actors playing princes William and Harry are seen only in long-shot).
But ultimately, what’s the point of Diana? It’s hardly fascinating. It doesn’t offer new facts about the Princess’s life. And it certainly doesn’t explain her complexity or contradictions. That would take a different, better film altogether.
=======================================
I just posted on another thread about the latest gossip about the night Diana died, can't find the thread now!!
David Gritten reviews Diana, the new biopic starring Naomi Watts.
2
Naomi Watts and Naveen Andrews star in the new biopic, Diana Photo: Alamy
By David Gritten
11:25PM BST 05 Sep 2013
Now here’s a film that trades on dealing with a relatively under-reported facet of Princess Diana’s eventful life: her romance with London-based Pakistani heart surgeon Hasnat Khan. And so it does, for much of its running time.
Yet it starts with a familiar sequence and repeats it at the end: on that awful night in 1997, in that wretched Paris hotel, Naomi Watts as Diana accompanies Dodi Fayed and security guards down a corridor into that tiny lift – to her death minutes later. Thus do the makers of Diana betray their intentions: the film is bookended by a redundant piece of lurid sensationalism.
In between it’s more pedestrian. Oliver Hirschbiegel, who directed the estimable Downfall, serves up a leaden account of how Diana met Khan, and how their stop-start two-year romance alternately blossomed and stumbled.
Watts makes a decent fist of playing Diana – she wears the clothes well (especially the glamorous ones) and the hair looks first-rate. But though she replicates Diana’s body language attentively (notably in the re-creation of her famous grilling by Martin Bashir, there’s something missing: the Princess’s wounded, doe-eyed gaze.
Related Articles
Diana: What you need to know about the film
05 Sep 2013
Diana: watch a scene from the film
05 Sep 2013
Diana film is 'completely wrong', says former lover
25 Aug 2013
'Diana' - straight to DVD
06 Sep 2013
Watts 'couldn't say no' to Diana role
05 Sep 2013
Watts stars at Diana world premiere
06 Sep 2013
Naveen Andrews makes a solid, stubborn Khan, and he’s given nice character touches: a jazz fan, he tells Diana to throw away the rule book and ‘improvise’ her life after the royal family closes ranks against her.
The major problem, predictably, comes with the dialogue, which involves characters telling each other things they already know. “I am a heart surgeon!” declares heart surgeon Khan. On another occasion: “You’re the most famous woman in the world.” Yes, we get it.
Adapted from Kate Snell’s book Diana: Her Last Love, first published in 2000, the film invents events in the couple’s courtship. Some of these beggar belief: would Diana, arriving at Khan’s empty, untidy flat, have started vacuuming frantically? Would the couple have walked around London parks so openly, without security protection?
Still, Stephen Jeffreys’ script touches most of the bases in Diana’s later life: her complicity with royal correspondents and a few favoured paparazzi: her ability to be calculating yet still seem like a lonely, lost innocent; her sincere support for victims of land mines; and her affection for her two sons who, judging from this account, she rarely saw. (In a welcome touch of restraint, the young actors playing princes William and Harry are seen only in long-shot).
But ultimately, what’s the point of Diana? It’s hardly fascinating. It doesn’t offer new facts about the Princess’s life. And it certainly doesn’t explain her complexity or contradictions. That would take a different, better film altogether.
=======================================
I just posted on another thread about the latest gossip about the night Diana died, can't find the thread now!!
Panda- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 67
Location : Wales
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-27
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Guest Sun 8 Sep - 12:36
Panda, there are no other posts from you today about Diana.
The one you mention can't have gone through.
Are we all waiting with baited breath to see the film? Probably not!
I remember a made for TV movie within a year or so of her death and that was as bad as this one sounds.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138698/
The one you mention can't have gone through.
Are we all waiting with baited breath to see the film? Probably not!
I remember a made for TV movie within a year or so of her death and that was as bad as this one sounds.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138698/
Guest- Guest
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
kitti Sun 8 Sep - 14:00
The film is all 'heresay'.....it's just pure fiction...the only people that know what really went on is Diana, who is dead and the heart surgeon ...who has never said anything about it to this day.
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Panda Sun 8 Sep - 15:24
NBY....I couldn't have pressed "send"
Anyway, all I said was it is in bad taste , William has just become a Father , his relationship with his Mother was very strong and I bet he was wishing she was alive to see her Grandson. RIP Diana.
Anyway, all I said was it is in bad taste , William has just become a Father , his relationship with his Mother was very strong and I bet he was wishing she was alive to see her Grandson. RIP Diana.
Panda- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 67
Location : Wales
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-27
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Panda Wed 18 Sep - 10:10
Panda- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 67
Location : Wales
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-27
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Guest Wed 18 Sep - 10:27
From what I've heard of the film so far, it bears as much resemblance to real life as Kate's book!
Guest- Guest
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Panda Wed 18 Sep - 10:51
Yes NBY, if I was Naomi Watts I would have turned down the role, Diana was sacred to so many people and her Family don't need this tripe.Not Born Yesterday wrote:From what I've heard of the film so far, it bears as much resemblance to real life as Kate's book!
Panda- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 67
Location : Wales
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-27
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Badboy Thu 19 Sep - 15:15
IF ONLY SOMEONE WOULD DO A FILM ABOUT A REMARKABLE PAIR OF ANCESTORS I HAD.
BACK TO SUBJECT,THEY SEEM TO NEVER WANT THE SUBJECT OF DIANA TO DIE DOWN
BACK TO SUBJECT,THEY SEEM TO NEVER WANT THE SUBJECT OF DIANA TO DIE DOWN
Badboy- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 8857
Age : 58
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-31
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Panda Thu 19 Sep - 15:48
Hi Badboy m I don't know whose idea this was to make a film about Diana's last "love", but it is in extremely poor taste , Her son has become a Dad and probably wished that his Mother was alive to see her Grandson . I doubt many will want to see it .Badboy wrote:IF ONLY SOMEONE WOULD DO A FILM ABOUT A REMARKABLE PAIR OF ANCESTORS I HAD.
BACK TO SUBJECT,THEY SEEM TO NEVER WANT THE SUBJECT OF DIANA TO DIE DOWN
Panda- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 67
Location : Wales
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-27
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Badboy Thu 19 Sep - 23:15
I HAVE RECEIVED SEVERAL TWEETS CONCERNING THE DRESSMAKER/FILM LOCATIONS LIKE BEACHY HEAD
Badboy- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 8857
Age : 58
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-31
Re: Diana's Final Obsession
Panda Fri 20 Sep - 0:08
I don't think many knew much about this Doctor while Diana was alive except that he was foreign and keeping his distance from her .Badboy wrote:I HAVE RECEIVED SEVERAL TWEETS CONCERNING THE DRESSMAKER/FILM LOCATIONS LIKE BEACHY HEAD
Panda- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 67
Location : Wales
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-27
Similar topics» Dianas Death- Police passed new info
» Princess Dianas' Landmine Charity suspends its Chief Executive
» Roma : A French obsession
» Footie Thread...................
» The 'Other' Final Photo
» Princess Dianas' Landmine Charity suspends its Chief Executive
» Roma : A French obsession
» Footie Thread...................
» The 'Other' Final Photo
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum