Blacksmith

Wintabells wrote:http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/

Thank you
 

Thanks Wintabells......Blacksmiths comments reflect the feeling we have that Redwood is talking through a hole in his head , suggesting 38 "persons of
interest" and on the next breath advertising for any information from the British Public.!!!!!! Why is it imperative that evidence must be found to confirm that Madeleine was "abducted"???? The review could have ended with a Report that nothing was found to explain what happened to Madeleine.

Panda wrote:
Thanks Wintabells......Blacksmiths comments reflect the feeling we have that Redwood is talking through a hole in his head , suggesting 38 "persons of
interest" and on the next breath advertising for any information from the British Public.!!!!!!   Why is it imperative that evidence must be found to confirm that Madeleine was "abducted"???? The review could have ended with a Report that nothing was found to explain what happened to Madeleine.

I think CEOP asked for tourists who were in PDL at the same time as the McCanns to send photos from their holiday. Those photos, if sent to CEOP, apparently did not reach the PJ. Perhaps SY is hoping for some of those photos.

AnnaEsse wrote:

Panda wrote:
Thanks Wintabells......Blacksmiths comments reflect the feeling we have that Redwood is talking through a hole in his head , suggesting 38 "persons of
interest" and on the next breath advertising for any information from the British Public.!!!!!!   Why is it imperative that evidence must be found to confirm that Madeleine was "abducted"???? The review could have ended with a Report that nothing was found to explain what happened to Madeleine.

I think CEOP asked for tourists who were in PDL at the same time as the McCanns to send photos from their holiday. Those photos, if sent to CEOP, apparently did not reach the PJ. Perhaps SY is hoping for some of those photos.

Morning AnnaEsse, can you believe that people will be bothered to sift through photos of their holiday 6 years ago that might be relevant to Madeleine's disappearance? It is obvious SY are clutching at straws and clocking up more expenses trying to prove Madeleine was abducted .......for what reason I would like to know, why has so much public money been spent on this particular disappearance? Who are the 7 Agencies the McCanns , or rather Fund, employed to search for Madeleine?

AnnaEsse wrote:

Panda wrote:
Thanks Wintabells......Blacksmiths comments reflect the feeling we have that Redwood is talking through a hole in his head , suggesting 38 "persons of
interest" and on the next breath advertising for any information from the British Public.!!!!!!   Why is it imperative that evidence must be found to confirm that Madeleine was "abducted"???? The review could have ended with a Report that nothing was found to explain what happened to Madeleine.

I think CEOP asked for tourists who were in PDL at the same time as the McCanns to send photos from their holiday. Those photos, if sent to CEOP, apparently did not reach the PJ. Perhaps SY is hoping for some of those photos.

Now we are getting into the whole territory of the 20 photographs on the camera that somebody had, the ones that were supposed to show Kate's change of clothing. The ones that Duarte Levy was supposed to have and tried to sell to the People for £1/4mil or some ridiculous amount. (None of which was true, because Duarte Levy never had the photos although he claimed to have seen them).

Iris wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

Panda wrote:
Thanks Wintabells......Blacksmiths comments reflect the feeling we have that Redwood is talking through a hole in his head , suggesting 38 "persons of
interest" and on the next breath advertising for any information from the British Public.!!!!!!   Why is it imperative that evidence must be found to confirm that Madeleine was "abducted"???? The review could have ended with a Report that nothing was found to explain what happened to Madeleine.

I think CEOP asked for tourists who were in PDL at the same time as the McCanns to send photos from their holiday. Those photos, if sent to CEOP, apparently did not reach the PJ. Perhaps SY is hoping for some of those photos.

Now we are getting into the whole territory of the 20 photographs on the camera that somebody had, the ones that were supposed to show Kate's change of clothing.  The ones that Duarte Levy was supposed to have and tried to sell to the People for £1/4mil or some ridiculous amount.  (None of which was true, because Duarte Levy never had the photos although he claimed to have seen them).

I remember the photos Iris, wasn't it a Holidaymaker in the Dining Room of the Ocean Club who took some photos of his Family which inadvertently included the McCanns. ? They could have confirmed the time the McCanns said they were checking on Madeleine.

Panda wrote:

Iris wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

Panda wrote:
Thanks Wintabells......Blacksmiths comments reflect the feeling we have that Redwood is talking through a hole in his head , suggesting 38 "persons of
interest" and on the next breath advertising for any information from the British Public.!!!!!!   Why is it imperative that evidence must be found to confirm that Madeleine was "abducted"???? The review could have ended with a Report that nothing was found to explain what happened to Madeleine.

I think CEOP asked for tourists who were in PDL at the same time as the McCanns to send photos from their holiday. Those photos, if sent to CEOP, apparently did not reach the PJ. Perhaps SY is hoping for some of those photos.

Now we are getting into the whole territory of the 20 photographs on the camera that somebody had, the ones that were supposed to show Kate's change of clothing.  The ones that Duarte Levy was supposed to have and tried to sell to the People for £1/4mil or some ridiculous amount.  (None of which was true, because Duarte Levy never had the photos although he claimed to have seen them).

I remember the photos Iris, wasn't it a Holidaymaker in the Dining Room of the Ocean Club who took some photos of his Family which inadvertently included the McCanns. ? They could have confirmed the time the McCanns said they were checking on Madeleine.

That's the ones Panda, and they are supposed to have proved that Kate changed her clothing during the course of the evening.  I believe that there was also a quote from the ubiquitous Clarence at the time, something along the lines of "even if she did, why would that make a difference".  But whether this is true, or forum myth, I don't know.  I will try and find a link.

eta http://www.mccannfiles.com/id156.html about 1/3 of the way down.

"According to Duarte Levy ---who told 24horas that he had seen some of the images—the colour photographs show the McCann couple and the Brits with whom they holidayed. The photographs were taken between 20h10 and 22h15, in the Tapas Bar. In one of the images, explains the journalist, it is possible to see that Kate McCann changed clothes during dinner. Remember that the group version of events tell us that Kate left the restaurant around 22h when Maddie disappeared. "

If the photos are true then it proves the timelines created on the back of a book were designed for the Group and the McCanns lied. 24 Horas is not the most accurate at reporting though, like some of our Dailies. !!1 The question has to be asked.....why didn't the PJ check this out when the info first surfaced, they would have had the name and address of the Man who took the Photos.

If the 24 photos ever existed, according to Duarte Levy, it's the PJ who, now, has got them. Imo, they never existed.

frencheuropean wrote: Imo, they never existed.

I agree with you, frencheuropean, I don't think they ever existed,

wjk wrote:

frencheuropean wrote:  Imo, they never existed.

I agree with you, frencheuropean, I don't think they ever existed,

Of course they never existed, it's all bollocks. If they had existed there would have been copies made, just as a back up even if it was for just blackmail purposes!

Iris wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

Panda wrote:
Thanks Wintabells......Blacksmiths comments reflect the feeling we have that Redwood is talking through a hole in his head , suggesting 38 "persons of
interest" and on the next breath advertising for any information from the British Public.!!!!!!   Why is it imperative that evidence must be found to confirm that Madeleine was "abducted"???? The review could have ended with a Report that nothing was found to explain what happened to Madeleine.

I think CEOP asked for tourists who were in PDL at the same time as the McCanns to send photos from their holiday. Those photos, if sent to CEOP, apparently did not reach the PJ. Perhaps SY is hoping for some of those photos.

Now we are getting into the whole territory of the 20 photographs on the camera that somebody had, the ones that were supposed to show Kate's change of clothing.  The ones that Duarte Levy was supposed to have and tried to sell to the People for £1/4mil or some ridiculous amount.  (None of which was true, because Duarte Levy never had the photos although he claimed to have seen them).

Sorry Iris, I wasn't referring to the photos Duarte Levy referred to. I was referring to a request by Jim Gamble for anyone who was on holiday in PDL at the same time as the McCanns to send photos to CEOP, If any photos were sent, they didn't get forwarded to the PJ. I think the hope was that if the McCanns happened to be in any of the other holiday-makers' snaps, there might also be someone caught watching the McCanns!

AnnaEsse wrote:

Iris wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

Panda wrote:
Thanks Wintabells......Blacksmiths comments reflect the feeling we have that Redwood is talking through a hole in his head , suggesting 38 "persons of
interest" and on the next breath advertising for any information from the British Public.!!!!!!   Why is it imperative that evidence must be found to confirm that Madeleine was "abducted"???? The review could have ended with a Report that nothing was found to explain what happened to Madeleine.

I think CEOP asked for tourists who were in PDL at the same time as the McCanns to send photos from their holiday. Those photos, if sent to CEOP, apparently did not reach the PJ. Perhaps SY is hoping for some of those photos.

Now we are getting into the whole territory of the 20 photographs on the camera that somebody had, the ones that were supposed to show Kate's change of clothing.  The ones that Duarte Levy was supposed to have and tried to sell to the People for £1/4mil or some ridiculous amount.  (None of which was true, because Duarte Levy never had the photos although he claimed to have seen them).

Sorry Iris, I wasn't referring to the photos Duarte Levy referred to. I was referring to a request by Jim Gamble for anyone who was on holiday in PDL at the same time as the McCanns to send photos to CEOP, If any photos were sent, they didn't get forwarded to the PJ. I think the hope was that if the McCanns happened to be in any of the other holiday-makers' snaps, there might also be someone caught watching the McCanns!

Yes, I would like to know about those photos, did Jim found them. And did k8 found the 'nice mum by the pool' she for some reason was looking for, urgently, if I remember it right. Both incidence sound like preventing some info getting to PJ..finding it before PJ, imo only, of course.