Why the great emphasis on a photofit?

Why after about 2 years, with reams of good solid evidence already available (undamaged smashed shutters, refusal to answer questions, Smiths, Gaspar, Canine, DNA in car, multiplicity of conflicting parental and tapas friend's statements), all of which more than hint at the McCanns, involvement in Madeleine's disappearance, have our intrepid Met investigators squandered a budget the size of the National Debt in presenting 2 photofit composites as groundbreaking and important evidence?

The previous contemporary investigative work surely isn't being swept under the carpet.... Is it?????????

Maybe SY need to resolve whether there is actually a legitimate explanation for a man fitting Gerry's description to be walking through Praia da Luz carrying a smallchild towards the beach before they arrest him? One can only hope. However, it is a move that I have been waiting for for 6 years.

Perhaps these two e fits fit know one in the hope that it will take the next 30 year to find him/them.

kitti wrote:Perhaps these two e fits fit know one in the hope that it will take the next 30 year to find him/them.

Do you not think that the e fits look like Gerry? The two combined would be the spitting image to me. Also, if everything we knew about the timeline is wrong (according to one paper) then tapas 9 are responsible. ie., their lying has to be acknowledged.

This is progress IMO.

vikkipollard5 wrote:
Maybe SY  need to resolve whether there is actually a legitimate explanation for a man fitting Gerry's description to be walking through Praia da Luz carrying a smallchild towards the beach before they arrest him?  One can only hope. However, it is a move that I have been waiting for for 6 years.

I'm with you!
I think SY know who it is.

wjk wrote:

vikkipollard5 wrote:
Maybe SY  need to resolve whether there is actually a legitimate explanation for a man fitting Gerry's description to be walking through Praia da Luz carrying a smallchild towards the beach before they arrest him?  One can only hope. However, it is a move that I have been waiting for for 6 years.

I'm with you!
I think SY know who it is.

I'm sure SY know who it is, but will they follow through or bottle out?

jassi wrote:

wjk wrote:

vikkipollard5 wrote:
Maybe SY  need to resolve whether there is actually a legitimate explanation for a man fitting Gerry's description to be walking through Praia da Luz carrying a smallchild towards the beach before they arrest him?  One can only hope. However, it is a move that I have been waiting for for 6 years.

I'm with you!
I think SY know who it is.

I'm sure SY know who it is, but will they follow through or bottle out?

Exactly!  

On the car radio this evening, Deadwood said "this man is not a suspect. He may be perfectly innocent." On the front page of the Sun, there's the picture under a huge headline, "Maddie's Snatcher". So which is it?  

vikkipollard5 wrote:

kitti wrote:Perhaps these two e fits fit know one in the hope that it will take the next 30 year to find him/them.

Do you not think that the e fits look like Gerry?  The two combined would be the spitting image to me.  Also, if everything we knew about the timeline is wrong (according to one paper) then tapas 9 are responsible. ie., their lying has to be acknowledged.

This is progress IMO.

Here you go,

[img][/img]