why wasnt all the tapas group on cw
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
why wasnt all the tapas group on cw
sorry to make another thread as there is many already - i watch cw all the time and the tapas group should have all been included -timelines everything its strange
cass- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1654
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-05-18
Re: why wasnt all the tapas group on cw
Maybe they have been eliminated from the police enquiries.cass wrote:sorry to make another thread as there is many already - i watch cw all the time and the tapas group should have all been included -timelines everything its strange
Re: why wasnt all the tapas group on cw
SY used crime watch to dispel the rumours re tanner and oldfield .
Tanner was mistaken re the efit, it WAS a bad father who didn't cover his child up.
Oldfield can now sleep at night re the NON checking to see if Madeleine was in her bed...his conscience is clear , Madeleine WAS in her bed as the 'abductor' hadnt 'abducted' her yet, so it didn't really matter if he didn't notice if she was in there or not.
Payne couldn't be mentioned as their is some sniggering and gossip on the Internet and showing him going to 5a and talking off 'children in pj's'....definately a no no imo and him talking about coppin an eyeful off Kate McCann in her towel too....would not off gone down well at all...you get my drift?
And as for O'Brien....he wasn't even their, he was washing sheets in the washing machine...that IMO could be twisted to seem like their was a REASON for doing so other that his child being sick.
Tanner was seen in a t shirt even though it was cold and it was even the wrong colour, unless she, when she went back, changed, now that could be misconstrued into people thinking she had a reason to change ..couldn't it
Tanner was mistaken re the efit, it WAS a bad father who didn't cover his child up.
Oldfield can now sleep at night re the NON checking to see if Madeleine was in her bed...his conscience is clear , Madeleine WAS in her bed as the 'abductor' hadnt 'abducted' her yet, so it didn't really matter if he didn't notice if she was in there or not.
Payne couldn't be mentioned as their is some sniggering and gossip on the Internet and showing him going to 5a and talking off 'children in pj's'....definately a no no imo and him talking about coppin an eyeful off Kate McCann in her towel too....would not off gone down well at all...you get my drift?
And as for O'Brien....he wasn't even their, he was washing sheets in the washing machine...that IMO could be twisted to seem like their was a REASON for doing so other that his child being sick.
Tanner was seen in a t shirt even though it was cold and it was even the wrong colour, unless she, when she went back, changed, now that could be misconstrued into people thinking she had a reason to change ..couldn't it
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Similar topics
» Tapas Group and Sickness
» The tapas children
» WHY DIDNT THE MET INTERVIEW MCCANNS AGAIN/WHO IS THE WOMAN IN PURPLE
» Tapas 9 Statements
» wonder what the tapas think
» The tapas children
» WHY DIDNT THE MET INTERVIEW MCCANNS AGAIN/WHO IS THE WOMAN IN PURPLE
» Tapas 9 Statements
» wonder what the tapas think
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum