The Truth About The McCanns Lie

The truth about the McCanns' lie, 17 June 2014

The truth about the McCanns' lie mccannfiles

The McCanns outside the Palace of Justice

By Nigel Moore
17 June 2014

Yesterday, outside the Palace of Justice, in Lisbon, following the postponement of court proceedings, the 'furious' McCanns raged:

Gerry McCann: "This is the fourth time that this has happened, when we've travelled to Portugal."

Kate McCann: "...this has happened now about four times, as Gerry said this can't be seen as anything but blatant and cynical."

So, no ambiguity there.

Needless to say, the tabloid media were not slow in picking up the McCann baton and running with it. Gary O'Shea (The Sun) was typical of most of the coverage: 'The parents of Madeleine McCann spoke out yesterday after an ex-cop deliberately delayed his libel trial for the FOURTH time.'

But what is the truth?

On 12 September 2013 Kate McCann attended, for no obvious reason, other than to deliver an 'emotional' statement outside the court for the waiting media.

- There was no postponement.

The following day 13 September 2013 Kate McCann attended, as an observer, with her mother who was due to appear as a witness.

- Proceedings were halted at lunch time after the judge failed to return due to a personal issue.

On 27 September 2013 Gerry McCann attended court, with sister Trish Cameron, even though he was not due to appear as a witness.

- Postponed due to illness of Gonçalo Amaral's lawyer's son.

On 02 October 2013 Gerry McCann once again travelled from the UK in the hope of being admitted to the process as a witness, thus allowing him to give evidence. However, the judge decided she would not rule on whether he could give evidence until after October 16.

Kate's mother, Susan Healy, also made the trip, for her second time, but was not allowed to give evidence due to a blunder by the McCanns' lawyer, Isabel Duarte.

On 07 January 2014 the impending libel trial was postponed as Gonçalo Amaral's lawyer filed a request for the court to evaluate the McCann couple's legitimacy to file a lawsuit in their daughter's name, as she is a Ward of Court in the UK. He did not ask for any postponement. It was the judge that issued a 15-day deadline for him to submit the relevant documentation.

Afterwards, Isabel Duarte filed a document related to Mr Alan Pike, and asked for a postponement of the session. The McCanns did not travel.

And?

That's it.

- One half-day postponement due to a personal issue relating to the judge.

- One postponement due to the illness of Vitor Santos de Oliveira's son who required hospital treatment.

- One occasion when Kate's mother, Susan Healy, was not heard due to a blunder by the McCanns' lawyer, Isabel Duarte but proceedings were not postponed, as Trish Cameron was heard.

- One postponement at the request of the McCanns' lawyer, Isabel Duarte, when the McCanns did not travel.

In total: Kate travelled once. Gerry travelled twice.

On no occasion were they due to be heard as witnesses - it was their decision to travel.

On no occasion were they denied their 'day in court' due to the postponement of proceedings.

So the accusation that Gonçalo Amaral has manipulated the postponement of the trial for the 'FOURTH time' is a blatant and cynical lie by the McCanns, lapped up without question by the mainstream media.

The truth is, this is the FIRST time (get that, Mr O'Shea?) that a decision by Gonçalo Amaral has directly affected the proceedings.

But then, why tell the truth when you can sell stories?

good post Panda.

tanszi wrote:good post Panda.

Thanks tanzi , this case is so convoluted it will never be over. I havn,t posted much today so wondered whether we know why Amaral did not tell the judge sooner so she could have fitted in another case yesterday, that was illmannered. IMO. Let's hope the next date next month dot's the I's and crosses the T's ...or is that wishful thinking   

You should make it clear that this article is copied from JillHaven site !

It doesnt quite collate to your earlier opinions on Amaral panda which you have failed to reply to ?

Lioned wrote:You should make it clear that this article is copied from JillHaven site !

It doesnt quite collate to your earlier opinions on Amaral panda which you have failed to reply to ?

That won't happen!
Just move to another thread and smear some more.
It's been pointed out multiple times that there would have been no way another case could have been heard on Monday. But why let the facts stop another Amaral smear, hey?

Even Ma Healeys local paper, The Liverpool Echo allowing comments now, the tide is starting to turn, read some of these.

-41
Hamish Spencer

2:18 AM on 18/6/2014

Goncalo Amaral is FAR from disgraced. He's an absolute hero and the only one standing up for Maddie against those murderous Mccanns and the scary 'silence of privilege' that surrounds them.

0
Name withheld

9:41 PM on 17/6/2014

This comment was left by a user who has been blocked by our staff.
Report Abuse

-37
Tracy Taylor

8:29 PM on 17/6/2014

Its like oscar pistorius sorry tale. kate mccann tried to get the shutter up but couldn't... It was her story and it was to be stuck to at all costs...She's almost forgot she couldnt get the shutter up but still gone along with whats been 'the' story in her head....Thats what happens when you lie...
Report Abuse


0
Name withheld

4:03 PM on 17/6/2014

This comment was left by a user who has been blocked by our staff.
Report Abuse

-23
Adele Munson

3:04 PM on 17/6/2014

I am a disgrace no a disgrace is a parent who goes out for a meal whilst their 3 children are left alone shame their morals weren't so high that evening them they wouldn't be in this situation truth none of us know the truth of what happen to poor Madeline and until we do how do we know they weren't involved the police don't so we surely don't
Report Abuse

-29
Dona Peggy Pattison

2:52 PM on 17/6/2014

So is dumpin ya kids ya a disgrace!!!
Report Abuse

-7
hilary.manning.507

2:11 PM on 17/6/2014

there is never balance in this story. These people left there children to drink and eat with friends choosing not to use the babysitting service available. They have continued to make money from their daughters disappearance and when they think the media attention is dying down they court attention again. No one ever questions their part in this .
Report Abuse

-27
John Scouse

1:22 PM on 17/6/2014

"What happened to Madeline Macann, 50 facts about the case that the British media are not telling you" Google it

Ps I know you're going to dislike the hell out of this comment but oh well, check that out for yourselves and ask yourself are you believing their so called story?

There are already a couple of threads containing Nigel Moore's article, taken from The McCann Files and Jill's site, perhaps they ought to be merged?

wantthetruth wrote:

Lioned wrote:You should make it clear that this article is copied from JillHaven site !

It doesnt quite collate to your earlier opinions on Amaral panda which you have failed to reply to ?

That won't happen!
Just move to another thread and smear some more.
It's been pointed out multiple times that there would have been no way another case could have been heard on Monday. But why let the facts stop another Amaral smear, hey?

Isn't there a saying that "there's none so blind as those who won't see"? I'm sure that was one of my grandmas's words of wisdom when people ignored the obvious.

Lioned wrote:You should make it clear that this article is copied from JillHaven site !

It doesnt quite collate to your earlier opinions on Amaral panda which you have failed to reply to ?

Well said Lioned. 

There is another poster who does a disappearing act, when asked to explain her comments. I feel sure it won't be long before she returns, now she has an ally.

dazedandconfused wrote:

wantthetruth wrote:

Lioned wrote:You should make it clear that this article is copied from JillHaven site !

It doesnt quite collate to your earlier opinions on Amaral panda which you have failed to reply to ?

That won't happen!
Just move to another thread and smear some more.
It's been pointed out multiple times that there would have been no way another case could have been heard on Monday. But why let the facts stop another Amaral smear, hey?

Isn't there a saying that "there's none so blind as those who won't see"?  I'm sure that was one of my grandmas's words of wisdom when people ignored the obvious.

  Dazedandconfused.

wantthetruth wrote:

Lioned wrote:You should make it clear that this article is copied from JillHaven site !

It doesnt quite collate to your earlier opinions on Amaral panda which you have failed to reply to ?

That won't happen!
Just move to another thread and smear some more.
It's been pointed out multiple times that there would have been no way another case could have been heard on Monday. But why let the facts stop another Amaral smear, hey?

  wantthetruth

Whatever Mr Amaral's reasons are, one thing is for sure. The McCanns took the bait, hook, line and all. I bet today they could bite their own tongues off.

If nothing else it has exposed them to the world as manipulators of the truth. Nigel Moore has summed up better than anyone but perhaps he should forward his observations to the press. I think The Express might be interested somehow.