The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann

I think people have asked WHY she won't be publishing her Findings till March.


I think it has to deal with the trial which comes to it's conclusion in Feb.


She has all the info she needs to produce the film now but I think she's biding her time until Mr Amaral wins his case .


We can't be sure the mccanns will appeal, I don't think they will, they won't want to lose any more money from the nice little stash they have and I'm hoping that Mr Amaral will sue them but can't be sure as he's not as greedy as the mccanns.


He may sue the newspapers..who knows ..it would mean getting a British lawyer and we all know how greedy they are .

Claudia79 wrote:

Marky wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:I'm getting a weird déjà vu feeling.

only this time i'll beat you to it. please delete my account. thanks.

Since with you we never know, can you just confirm that you are indeed not making another one of your jokes and that is your true desire? We are here to please you, evidently: you want to join, you get in. You want to leave, your wish is our command. You want to come back, we open the door for you. You want to go again, and here we are to fulfil your wishes. I just need to be sure they are, in fact your wishes.

ETA: I never banned you so the 'this time I'll beat you to it' thing doesn't make any sense.

hi claudia, long time no talk. how's tricks with you?

I thought you'd gone, never to be heard of again - obviously not

jassi wrote:I thought you'd gone, never to be heard of again - obviously not

good time to step back but that's your call.

What changed your mind, or were you just teasing ?

jassi wrote:What changed your mind, or were you just teasing ?

nothing to do with you.

Marky wrote:

jassi wrote:What changed your mind, or were you just teasing ?

nothing to do with you.

True, I just thought you might like to share.

jassi wrote:

Marky wrote:

jassi wrote:What changed your mind, or were you just teasing ?

nothing to do with you.

True, I just thought you might like to share.

well, there ya go.

Marky wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:

Marky wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:I'm getting a weird déjà vu feeling.

only this time i'll beat you to it. please delete my account. thanks.

Since with you we never know, can you just confirm that you are indeed not making another one of your jokes and that is your true desire? We are here to please you, evidently: you want to join, you get in. You want to leave, your wish is our command. You want to come back, we open the door for you. You want to go again, and here we are to fulfil your wishes. I just need to be sure they are, in fact your wishes.

ETA: I never banned you so the 'this time I'll beat you to it' thing doesn't make any sense.

hi claudia, long time no talk. how's tricks with you?

Fine, thanks. Just hoping this new year I won't have to solve problems which actually don't exist unless people make them up. And you?

Claudia79 wrote:Fine, thanks. Just hoping this new year I won't have to solve problems which actually don't exist unless people make them up. And you?

hunky dory baby, hunky dory.

Of course everybody on this fantastic site knows this but for me I feel it is worth saying again that not one tiny piece of evidence has emerged over all these years, and all this expenditure, to show the involvement of anybody in Maddies disappearance. What do we know for certain? All we have are two child-neglecting parents saying that their child was taken. None of us know if the parents were involved but what evidence is there for anybody else being involved? I am still hopeful that somebody will come forward with the truth.

Wow Anna!

PG's comment sounds worryingly like another threat, along the lines of those directed at Brenda Leyland. As others have said, I hope Sonia Poulton is watching her back.

saloongirl wrote:PG's comment sounds worryingly like another threat, along the lines of those directed at Brenda Leyland. As others have said, I hope Sonia Poulton is watching her back.

It sure reads like a threat to me and I'm glad it's been saved.

I assume it's off Facebook, Anna. Sounds ominous.

I'm looking into Tweets sent today and hopefully saving them.

whatsupdoc wrote:I assume it's off Facebook, Anna. Sounds ominous.

I'm looking into Tweets sent today and hopefully saving them.

Sounds ominous to me as well. What on earth is going on in Great Britain? All these past sexual allegations involving some members of Parliament, ETC. are deeply concerning. What I can't understand is why two doctors who became infamous seven and a half years ago are being protected when it is so obvious they should, at the very least, be held accountable for neglect of their three children and the "disappearance" of Madeleine.

whatsupdoc wrote:I assume it's off Facebook, Anna. Sounds ominous.

I'm looking into Tweets sent today and hopefully saving them.

Yes, from Facebook today.

"There Can Be Only One - hopefully not Tony" is worth a read at cristobell.blogspot.co.uk