Reported missing on April 30th

https://web.archive.org/web/20070430115803/http://www.ceop.gov.uk/mccann.html

http://truthformadeleine.com/2015/06/madeleine-officially-missing-on-april-30-2007/

Not seen this before, have you????

No. Well, well! What does this mean?
How reliable is the time machine?

WOW!!! "Today a link was found that indicates foreknowledge on the part of CEOP." ("April 30, 2007 at 11:58:03")

Is this for real? If it is, I hope it proves of benefit to Dr. Amaral. It might explain why Gerry had some very unusual bedtime reading material with him in Portugal, I'm thinking about the CEOP book or manual. It would also give the McCanns lots of time for clean up.

Looking forward to others commenting on this startling article.

Striking indeed... on the face of it BUT... over and again we find with 'significant' articles the date has been put on wrong or something... so I'm not getting too excited... yet.

I just checked the Legal Defence Fund and it appears people are asking for recent comments regarding the CEOP page to be deleted.

Second thought about CEOP - was Jim Gamble associated with the organization in 2007?

Lots more information here.

http://maddiemccannmystery.forumotion.co.uk/t800-ceop-show-maddie-is-missing-on-30th-april-2007

Interested: JG was involved with CEOP from April 2006 according to his LinkedIn profile.

On the "April 30" CEOP page, if you "click here" (where it says to download a copy of the Madeleine campaign poster) that takes you to another poster which indicates Madeleine "has been missing for a number of days".

Something fishy here.....missing for a number of days PRIOR to April 30????? A "number" without specifying which "number"?????

It's all too much to take in. I do wonder however about Gerry not wanting to comment on whether he knew Murat who just happened to show up again in Portugal.....May 1st I think.

Mystery upon mystery continues.

Not Born Yesterday wrote:Lots more information here.

http://maddiemccannmystery.forumotion.co.uk/t800-ceop-show-maddie-is-missing-on-30th-april-2007

Interested: JG was involved with CEOP from April 2006 according to his LinkedIn profile.

A very interesting discussion running on this site. Well worth a read and hopefully might lead somewhere.

From Twitter - Isabelle Maria McF @ QUEENdePORTUGAL - "Interpret as U wish..I've spoken to Wayback Rep He stands by date apparently so do courts. I've sent to PJ" #mccann

interested wrote:From Twitter - Isabelle Maria McF @ QUEENdePORTUGAL - "Interpret as U wish..I've spoken to Wayback Rep He stands by date apparently so do courts.  I've sent to PJ"  #mccann

Here we go interested.
VERY interesting!!

Congratulations to "Isabelle" (in the U.S.) who appears to have come up with the verification of Steve Marsden's investigation.

I hope "Isabelle" is able to get a U.S. broadcaster interested in this story. Nancy Grace would be a good mouthpiece. Both she and Pat Brown are busy at the moment covering the story of the two escaped N.Y. convicts but I'd like to hear Nancy report on this with her trademark "Bombshell Tonight"...... (after she has done her own research).

interested wrote:I hope "Isabelle" is able to get a U.S. broadcaster interested in this story.  Nancy Grace would be a good mouthpiece.  Both she and Pat Brown are busy at the moment covering the story of the two escaped N.Y. convicts but I'd like to hear Nancy report on this with her trademark "Bombshell Tonight"...... (after she has done her own research).

Nancy Grace has been pro Mccann from day one

fred wrote:

interested wrote:I hope "Isabelle" is able to get a U.S. broadcaster interested in this story.  Nancy Grace would be a good mouthpiece.  Both she and Pat Brown are busy at the moment covering the story of the two escaped N.Y. convicts but I'd like to hear Nancy report on this with her trademark "Bombshell Tonight"...... (after she has done her own research).

Nancy Grace has been pro Mccann from day one

I know she has, that's why I said she should do her own research. I think in the past she has just regurgitated the official McCann abduction bs.

What was the date the group arrived in portugal.

Keela wrote:What was the date the group arrived in portugal.

April 28th (I think)

In checking the recent donations to the Legal Defence Fund, I noticed a recent comment from "Rosalind S" who mentions yesterday's prolonged controversy over the conflicting e-mails sent out by Wayback Archive and suggests the company has "now become embroiled in this case". The comment is quite lengthy but is well worth reading - it covers a lot of ground - mentioning among other things "perjury, perverting the course of justice and misconduct in office."

It would be great to think we've discovered something monumental in this case, but I just don't believe it.  People can do very clever things with computer records.

Its a glitch in the system that plays games with the dates.Sorry nothing but wishfull thinking here.

Very strange that SY have gone completely quiet after 'Deadwood' kept the newspapers happy throughout his tenure and now Ms Wall not a word since taking over !

And the hags bike ride hardly a mention ?

[quote="Lioned"]Its a glitch in the system that plays games with the dates.Sorry nothing but wishfull thinking here.

Very strange that SY have gone completely quiet after 'Deadwood' kept the newspapers happy throughout his tenure and now Ms Wall not a word since taking over !

And the hags bike ride hardly a mention ?

[/quote]

Certain IT-literate people are saying otherwise. I guess time will tell, but the ensuing discussions are fascinating.

Yep i've seen it and a degree in computer science and electronic engineering says nothing but a loose connection and a blown 3 amp fuse in the research department.

Knowledge-wise, I'm in no position to judge either way, however ...

If it's a Wayback error, then their credibility is screwed.

But if that date is accurate, it's dynamite.

almostgothic wrote:Knowledge-wise, I'm in no position to judge either way, however ...

If it's a Wayback error, then their credibility is screwed.

But if that date is accurate, it's dynamite.

I'm fully in agreement with that.

It isn't something which is going to go away without a very good explanation and knowledgeable people are digging deeper and deeper.