Dr. Paulo Sargento: Grau de Destruição, 11,1,10, on Joanas Block

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2010/01/grau-de-destruicao.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+JoanaMorais+%28Joana+Morais%29

“Grau de Destruição”
11 January 2010 | Posted by Joana Morais Leave a Comment


Em 1966 F. Truffaut realizou o notável “Fahrenheit 451”. Esta película de ficção científica, que sempre me apaixonou, encontra no momento actual uma das suas mais infelizes concretizações com a notícia, publicada num jornal diário, cujo título é: “Casal McCann pede destruição total de livros”.

por Dr. Paulo Sargento

Com efeito, os McCann têm pedido muito e dado muito pouco ou, mesmo, nada! É lamentável que, já, nem eles falem da pequena Madeleine McCann (sua filha e co-requerente no processo – ainda que, infelizmente, nenhum tribunal conheça o seu paradeiro actual e, consequentemente, estatuto jurídico) e estejam mais preocupados com a sua imagem pública e com os, hipotéticos, avultados lucros de livros e vídeos que contrariam a sua versão do que aconteceu a 3 de Maio de 2007.

No meio desta luta inglória cabe, contudo, questionar: onde está Madeleine? Após o arquivamento do processo, o que foi feito para a encontrar?

Uma das testemunhas arroladas pelo casal McCann é Dave Edgar, um dos “detectives privados” que, nos últimos tempos, se têm dedicado a procurar a menina.

Pensemos um pouco de forma simples: com tantos detectives privados que, nos últimos dois anos, têm trabalhado no caso, o que foi conseguido relativamente à localização da pequena Madeleine? Nada. Infelizmente, Nada. Por que razão? Será que é sensato acreditar que tal insucesso se deve ao livro de Gonçalo Amaral? Será que o Mundo inteiro se desinteressou da pequena Maddie devido aos argumentos do ex-inspector Gonçalo Amaral? Das duas, uma: ou Gonçalo Amaral é Genial ou o Mundo é Estúpido!

O processo relativo ao caso Maddie pode ser reaberto. Basta que Kate McCann, sua mãe, aceda a responder a uma única das mais de quatro dezenas de questões que se recusou, conscientemente, a responder, em Setembro de 2007.

Realizei, em conjunto com o meu colega Pedro Gamito, a primeira simulação 3D sobre os acontecimentos do dia 3 de Maio de 2007. Apresentei argumentos para sustentar a conclusão de que a tese de rapto era insustentável. O argumentário, que ora repito, resume-se ao seguinte: foram os pais da menina a sugerir a hipótese de rapto, apresentando uma sequência de tempos de vigilância às crianças (que não só a Maddie) que não ultrapassava, em média, os 7 minutos em termos absolutos (valor que seria severamente diminuído se contássemos, para além das deslocações dos diversos personagens do tapas 9, com as referidas paragens, junto ao apartamento, para conversas entre os referidos personagens). Que critérios tem o casal McCann, ou os detectives que tem contratado, para demonstrarem a possibilidade de se tratar de um rapto? Confesso que gostaria de conhecer, pelo menos, um argumento que pudesse ser colocado à discussão e argumentação lógica. Lamento que até agora tal não tenha acontecido.

É triste! Em vez de serem apresentados argumentos que sustentam uma tese, são esgrimidas tentativas de destruição das teses contrárias, facto que, nem sequer, merece o qualificativo de antítese.

Madeleine McCann não é filha de Gonçalo Amaral! Madeleine McCann é filha de Kate e de Gerry McCann. Lamento que o casal McCann insista em preocupar-se mais com Gonçalo Amaral do que com a sua filha e que, tal como no filme “Fahrenheit 451”, julgue que os Bombeiros, ao invés de apagarem fogos, devem incendiar livros…


Poor Promt-translation, please don´t take it too serious....


“Degree of Destruction”
11 January 2010 | Posted by Joana Morais Leave to Comment

In 1966 F. Truffaut carried out the remarkable person “Fahrenheit 451”. This film of scientific fiction, which me always fell in love, finds in the current moment one of his the most unfortunate realizations with the piece of news published in a daily newspaper, which title is: "Couple McCann asks total destruction of books”.

for Dr. Paul Sargento

With effect, the McCann have been asking very much and very little fact or, even, swim! It is regrettable what, already, you do not even link talk about small Madeleine McCann (his daughter and co-petitioner in the process – though, unfortunately, no court should know his current whereabouts and, consequently, legal statute) and they should be more preoccupied with his public image and with, hypothetical, bulky profits of books and videos that contradict his version of what happened to the 3rd of May of 2007.

In the middle of this inglorious struggle it suits, nevertheless, to question: where is Madeleine? After the filing of the process, which was done to find it?

One of the witnesses listed by the couple McCann is Dave Edgar, one of the “private detectives” that, in the last times, have been devoting themselves to look for the girl.

Let's think a little in the simple form: with so many private detectives who, in the last two years, have been working in the case, which was got relatively to the location of small Madeleine? It swims. Unfortunately, Not at all. For what reason? Will it be that it is sensible to believe what about failure is due to the book of Gonçalo Amaral? Will it be that the whole World lost interest of small Maddie due to the arguments of the ex-inspector Gonçalo Amaral? Of the two, one: or Gonçalo Amaral is Brilliant or the World is Rude!

The process relative to the case Maddie can be reopened. It is enough that Kate McCann, his mother, agrees answering the only one of more than four ten of questions that it refused to answer, consciously, in September of 2007.

I carried out, together with my colleague Peter Gamito, the first simulation 3D on the events from the 3rd of May of 2007. I presented arguments to support the conclusion of which the kidnapping theory was untenable. The argumentário, which now I repeat, consists in a next one: they were the parents of the girl to suggest the hypothesis of kidnapping, presenting a sequence of times of vigilance to the children (what not only Maddie) what was not exceeding, on average, 7 minutes in absolute terms (value that would be severely reduced if we were disposing, besides the dislocations of several characters of slaps 9, of the above-mentioned stoppings, near the apartment, for conversations between the above-mentioned characters). Which criteria the couple McCann has, or the detectives whom it has been employing, to demonstrate the possibility to be treated as a kidnapping? I confess what would like knowing, at least, an argument that could be put to the discussion and logical argumentation. Lament that up to now such has not happened.

It is sad! Instead of there were presented arguments that support a theory, they are brandished attempts of destruction of the opposite theories, fact that, not even, deserves the qualifier of antithesis.

Madeleine McCann is not a daughter of Gonçalo Amaral! Madeleine McCann is a daughter of Kate and of Gerry McCann. Lament that the couple McCann insists in be preoccupying more with Gonçalo Amaral of what with his daughter and that, such as in the movie “Fahrenheit 451”, it judges that the Firemen, instead of putting fires out, must set books alight …

Translation from Joanas:

"Point of Destruction"
11 January 2010 | Posted by Joana Morais Leave a Comment


In 1966, F. Truffaut directed the remarkable "Fahrenheit 451". This science fiction film, which has always passionated me, finds at the present moment one of its most unfortunate fulfillments with the news published in a daily newspaper, whose title is "McCann couple demands books to be fully destroyed".

by Dr. Paulo Sargento

Indeed, the McCanns have asked for much and given very little or close to nothing! It is unfortunate that not even them, at the moment, speak of the little girl Madeleine McCann (their daughter and co-applicant in the process - even though, unfortunately, no court is aware of her whereabouts, and thus of her legal status) and are more concerned with their public image and with, the theoretical, enormous profits from books and videos which oppose their version of what happened on May 3, 2007.

In the middle of this inglorious battle, one should, however, question: Where is Madeleine? After the archival of the process, what was done to find her?

One of the witnesses presented by the McCanns is Dave Edgar, one of the "private detectives" who, in recent times, has dedicated himself to searching the girl.

Let us make a simple consideration, with so many private detectives that for the last two years, have worked on the case, what has been achieved regarding the location of the little girl, Madeleine? Nothing. Unfortunately, nothing. Why? Is it reasonable to believe that this failure is due to the book of Gonçalo Amaral? Did the whole world lost interest in Maddie due to the arguments of the former inspector Gonçalo Amaral? One of two things: either Gonçalo Amaral is a Genius or the World is Stupid!

The process relating to Maddie case can be reopened. Kate McCann, the mother, just has to answer to one of the more than four dozens of questions that she refused, consciously, to answer in September 2007.

Together with my colleague Peter Gamito, we made the first 3D simulation of the events of May 3, 2007. I have presented arguments to support the conclusion that the abduction theory was untenable. The argumentation, which I repeat now, boils down to this: it were the girl's parents that suggested the possibility of abduction, presenting a sequence of timings for the supervision of the children (not of Maddie alone) which did not exceed, on average, 7 minutes in absolute terms (values that would be severely shortened if relying, in addition, on the movements of the several tapas 9 characters, with the stated stops near the apartment and on the conversations between these characters). What criteria has the McCann couple, or the detectives who they have been hiring, to demonstrate the possibility for an abduction? I confess that I would like to know, at least, one argument that could be put up for discussion and logical argumentation. I regret that so far that has not happened.

Sadly, instead of presenting arguments that could sustain such a thesis, attempts to destruct opposing views are wielded, a fact which doesn't even deserve the adjective of antithesis.

Madeleine McCann is not the daughter of Gonçalo Amaral! Madeleine McCann is the daughter of Kate and Gerry McCann. I regret that the McCanns insist in worrying more with Gonçalo Amaral than with their daughter and that, like in the movie "Fahrenheit 451", believe that firefighters, rather than putting out fires, should burn books ...