An Open Letter to Carter-Ruck about there clients

Can one of our more literate forum members knock one out. Not libelous, more factual.

We can prove Kate and Gerry Have told lies.

Time to attack rather than react.

Proactive rather than reactive.

Kick them in the balls first.

if a decent draft is drawn up, i'll sign it, with my real ID.

I think they already know what the mccanns are like, they are getting vast amounts off money, you dont think they will 'wave goodbye' to all that, do you.

Laffin Assasin wrote:Can one of our more literate forum members knock one out. Not libelous, more factual.

We can prove Kate and Gerry Have told lies.

Time to attack rather than react.

Proactive rather than reactive.

Kick them in the balls first.

if a decent draft is drawn up, i'll sign it, with my real ID.

*if a decent draft is drawn up, i'll sign it, with my real ID.*


Very interesting development and posted here?

I'm not sure what your getting at there mgunnill, can you expand on that ?

Laffin Assasin wrote:I'm not sure what your getting at there mgunnill, can you expand on that ?

I wondered that too. Very cryptic isn't it?

There is NO WAY Carter Ruck are going to walk away from the McCann's - they'll be their best client in years - kerching!

CR almost certainly have an ethics committee, they will continue to send bills to and cash chaques from K&G until the ethics committee tells them that their client is having a negative effect on their own reputation. From that day, the words drop and hot potato spring to mind.

jojo wrote:CR almost certainly have an ethics committee, they will continue to send bills to and cash chaques from K&G until the ethics committee tells them that their client is having a negative effect on their own reputation. From that day, the words drop and hot potato spring to mind.

That's not normally the purpose of an ethics committee by any stretch of the imagination - sounds more like PR or even risk assessment committee

Photon wrote:

jojo wrote:CR almost certainly have an ethics committee, they will continue to send bills to and cash chaques from K&G until the ethics committee tells them that their client is having a negative effect on their own reputation. From that day, the words drop and hot potato spring to mind.

That's not normally the purpose of an ethics committee by any stretch of the imagination - sounds more like PR or even risk assessment committee

Different names for what is effectively the same thing in different professions, same aim, protect income if possible but above all protect reputation, yes it is risk managment, certainly.

Carter Ruck think ethics is a county just outside London.

SteveT wrote:Carter Ruck think ethics is a county just outside London.

Laffin Assasin wrote:I'm not sure what your getting at there mgunnill, can you expand on that ?

It means an interesting development; will you also post the letter here in your own name? Simple, straight forward comment.

plus
( I wondered that too. Very cryptic isn't it? )

Not cryptic at all!!!!!

i want to know why mgunnill is being provocative?
it wouldnt be that much of an interesting development......letters galore have been sent to many with no effect.
and why should posters put up their real name - it can dent our sense of security with relation to freedom of speech somewhat - dont you think?

Totally agree Oliver, I dont know what mgunnell is upto but I for one dont like it.

mgunnill wrote:

Laffin Assasin wrote:I'm not sure what your getting at there mgunnill, can you expand on that ?

It means an interesting development; will you also post the letter here in your own name? Simple, straight forward comment.

plus
( I wondered that too. Very cryptic isn't it? )

Not cryptic at all!!!!!

I really need to ask a few questions here, mgunnill, because (for me) this is as clear as mud.

a) What, precisely, is the development that you consider to be interesting?
b) Why is that development interesting?