Compliant regarding Cipri-case has been DISMISSED today, 17.3.10

Claudia79 wrote:

tanszi wrote:Claudia79 nezxt time you speak, text, email or whatever to Goncalo Amaral would you please say how pleased we all are for him. Many thanks.

I will.
And he knows.

Thanks Claudia. I am so glad to hear that. Dr Amaral is a man of dignity and integrity and I would want him to know how much he is respected.

AnnaEsse wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:

tanszi wrote:Claudia79 nezxt time you speak, text, email or whatever to Goncalo Amaral would you please say how pleased we all are for him. Many thanks.

I will.
And he knows.

Thanks Claudia. I am so glad to hear that. Dr Amaral is a man of dignity and integrity and I would want him to know how much he is respected.

ditto

great news for a great man!

Claudia, I didn't say he was guilty, I said he lost two cases

You don't have to appeal unless you lose... is that right.

perhaps you are the ignorant(your word, sorry if you find it offensive) one.

Brill news.

So very pleased for him and his family.

jack wrote:Claudia, I didn't say he was guilty, I said he lost two cases

You don't have to appeal unless you lose... is that right.

perhaps you are the ignorant(your word, sorry if you find it offensive) one.

I don't think you have to appeal. It's probably not obligatory!
And who would want to appeal if they won? Please Your Honour, I think you ought to reconsider finding me innocent in this case.

jack wrote:Claudia, I didn't say he was guilty, I said he lost two cases

You don't have to appeal unless you lose... is that right.

perhaps you are the ignorant(your word, sorry if you find it offensive) one.

Well, I suggest you do a bit of research on appeals in Portuguese law and then mesmerise us with your brilliancy.
Until then, I'll leave you to deal with your ignorance regarding Portuguese legal details alone.

P.S: I don't find ignorance offensive at all. If there weren't ignorant people, I'd be out of a job.

AnnaEsse wrote:

jack wrote:Claudia, I didn't say he was guilty, I said he lost two cases

You don't have to appeal unless you lose... is that right.

perhaps you are the ignorant(your word, sorry if you find it offensive) one.

I don't think you have to appeal. It's probably not obligatory!
And who would want to appeal if they won? Please Your Honour, I think you ought to reconsider finding me innocent in this case.

Well if you dont appeal then you accept you are guilty, ask Claudia!

jack wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

jack wrote:Claudia, I didn't say he was guilty, I said he lost two cases

You don't have to appeal unless you lose... is that right.

perhaps you are the ignorant(your word, sorry if you find it offensive) one.

I don't think you have to appeal. It's probably not obligatory!
And who would want to appeal if they won? Please Your Honour, I think you ought to reconsider finding me innocent in this case.

Well if you dont appeal then you accept you are guilty, ask Claudia!

Did you miss the point I was making. Whatever one does or does not accept, the appeals process is not something anyone has to do.

AnnaEsse wrote:

jack wrote:Claudia, I didn't say he was guilty, I said he lost two cases

You don't have to appeal unless you lose... is that right.

perhaps you are the ignorant(your word, sorry if you find it offensive) one.

I don't think you have to appeal. It's probably not obligatory!
And who would want to appeal if they won? Please Your Honour, I think you ought to reconsider finding me innocent in this case.

AnnaEsse wrote:

jack wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

jack wrote:Claudia, I didn't say he was guilty, I said he lost two cases

You don't have to appeal unless you lose... is that right.

perhaps you are the ignorant(your word, sorry if you find it offensive) one.

I don't think you have to appeal. It's probably not obligatory!
And who would want to appeal if they won? Please Your Honour, I think you ought to reconsider finding me innocent in this case.

Well if you dont appeal then you accept you are guilty, ask Claudia!

Did you miss the point I was making. Whatever one does or does not accept, the appeals process is not something anyone has to do.

Now Claudia has referred to my brilliancy I think I should retire.

AnnaEsse... I don't think you have quite kept up with the debate...bless

super fandabbidozi

hello jack, welcome, what is your point exactly? are you pleased with the latest news? i think you should be but it's up to you

if you were beaten up by a policeman would you wait 5 years to make a case?

amethyst wrote:hello jack, welcome, what is your point exactly? are you pleased with the latest news? i think you should be but it's up to you

if you were beaten up by a policeman would you wait 5 years to make a case?

In all fairness, Mr Leandro was waiting for the right lawyer!

It has become so predictable and transparent, that when a good piece of New's has been told, you get a new Person suddenly arrive on the Forum and they try to turn it all around.

Someone must be worried!.

Claudia79 wrote:

amethyst wrote:hello jack, welcome, what is your point exactly? are you pleased with the latest news? i think you should be but it's up to you

if you were beaten up by a policeman would you wait 5 years to make a case?

In all fairness, Mr Leandro was waiting for the right lawyer!

lol

Jack (S) Pratt you should eat more fat, it nourishes the brain
You're not amusing nor of our choosing so don't come here again

re .jacks post.....i think i may have just clicked on the + when i meant the -, please moderate for me,

4timesanan wrote:re .jacks post.....i think i may have just clicked on the + when i meant the -, please moderate for me,

No you didn't. There is no plus + there Nan

Thank you. Some wonderful news at last.

amethyst wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:

tanszi wrote:Claudia79 nezxt time you speak, text, email or whatever to Goncalo Amaral would you please say how pleased we all are for him. Many thanks.

I will.
And he knows.

Thanks Claudia. I am so glad to hear that. Dr Amaral is a man of dignity and integrity and I would want him to know how much he is respected.

ditto

My sentiments exactly.
Great news for a great man.

Claudia79 wrote:

amethyst wrote:hello jack, welcome, what is your point exactly? are you pleased with the latest news? i think you should be but it's up to you

if you were beaten up by a policeman would you wait 5 years to make a case?

In all fairness, Mr Leandro was waiting for the right lawyer!

Nice one!

Am happy for Sr Amaral.
And you're right of course, AA - someone is definitely worried. The aim, which was to eradicate him, is not going entirely to plan. IMO.

Tough luck for some!!

eddie wrote:

4timesanan wrote:re .jacks post.....i think i may have just clicked on the + when i meant the -, please moderate for me,

No you didn't. There is no plus + there Nan

If I could make one suggestion it would be for all newbie/trolls when they get to -5 they get banned?

jack wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

jack wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

jack wrote:Claudia, I didn't say he was guilty, I said he lost two cases

You don't have to appeal unless you lose... is that right.

perhaps you are the ignorant(your word, sorry if you find it offensive) one.

I don't think you have to appeal. It's probably not obligatory!
And who would want to appeal if they won? Please Your Honour, I think you ought to reconsider finding me innocent in this case.

Well if you dont appeal then you accept you are guilty, ask Claudia!

Did you miss the point I was making. Whatever one does or does not accept, the appeals process is not something anyone has to do.

Now Claudia has referred to my brilliancy I think I should retire.

AnnaEsse... I don't think you have quite kept up with the debate...bless

Kinda late to be up on a school night isn't it Jack?

Well done and congratulations Mr Amaral to you and your family. Keep strong and your head held high with pure dignity like you always do.