UPDATE : Tony Bennett

Congratulations and well done to Tony Bennett. What a brave courageous man!! Once the McCanns are behind bars, Tony Bennett should be included in the Queen's Honour List or, for that matter, even before that eventuality.

Well Done Tony Bennett.

I expected the Telegraph to cover the hearing today as a follow-up to the article of last week. So far I haven't been able to locate anything in tomorrow's (Thursday's) paper. Possibly in the morning then.

WELL DONE TONY

AnnaEsse wrote:

The McCanns were represented by Jacob Dean (barrister), Adam Tudor, Isabel Hudson and two assistants.

WELL DONE TONY

AnnaEsse wrote:

It's just laughable, sending all those people in against one man representing himself, who actually stood up to them and did pretty well!

It certainly was!!

WELL DONE Tony (and supporters) sounds like you did really well.

Guys I posted that Mike Gunnill will testify and I dont know the connection with the 60 reasons book.
Please can someone explain, I do know that he aquired the book - BUT HOW??

I have followed this case from day one (my children are Algarvians so its really close to my heart) and for some reason this Mike Gunnill slip through the cracks in relation to my research.
Someone help me out please

With acknowledgement to the Jill Havern forum, here's a link to Tony's own account of the incident, Karen.

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t4279-mystery-mike-gunnill-a-book-a-courier-and-a-third-party?highlight=

P.S. My "signature" about slithering creatures was chosen for Mike Gunnill in particular.

almostgothic wrote:It really throws into focus the huge legal shield they're hiding behind.

This farce merely beggars the questions

Why only them, why not all who fail their children and publicly admit their failings?
Who is permitting this flagrant abuse of the legal system?

Well done Tony

I'm humbled by Tony B's bravery in standing up to them. If it wasn't so serious, it would be laughable that they've brought out the big guns against one man standing alone.

malena stool wrote:

almostgothic wrote:It really throws into focus the huge legal shield they're hiding behind.

This farce merely beggars the questions

Why only them, why not all who fail their children and publicly admit their failings?
Who is permitting this flagrant abuse of the legal system?

Well done Tony

Just watch any public sympathy left for them drain away as it becomes increasingly apparent that the Fund money is being used to pay for expensive lawyers. The more they sue, the worse they will look.

Not Born Yesterday wrote:With acknowledgement to the Jill Havern forum, here's a link to Tony's own account of the incident, Karen.

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t4279-mystery-mike-gunnill-a-book-a-courier-and-a-third-party?highlight=

P.S. My "signature" about slithering creatures was chosen for Mike Gunnill in particular.

aaaaah youré a hun, thank you!
I am going to make myself a strong cuppa tea, sit back relax and read.
Thanks again - KK

WOW! interesting times ahead then huh??! Mike Gunnill is tweeting but nothing of any value, although loads of snotty comments to him