Re: Inside the twisted minds of the Madeleine McCann Child Snatchers

**wjk** Sun 29 Apr - 12:38

The End Is Nigh wrote:
Loopdaloop wrote:
wjk wrote:
Yep! And Andy Redwood has read this and believes it!! Thats the really worrying part!!

Wheres the link for Redwood believing this?
I still haven't say anything of importance from scotland yards perspective!

You are quite right, Loopdaloop.

Nothing at all that casts any light on the detail of what is going on was said. Nothing.

That's why Panorama and related pieces have caused such a wide range of reaction - Because people believe what they want to believe by extrapolating relatively neutral words and assigning to them meanings they probably don't have.

Some people took it badly, some (like thee and me) see it as being an adequate job of saying something whilst saying nothing (as it should be) and giving nothing of substance away - and yet amongst neutrals there seems to be a slight awakening and a dawning that all that has gone before (in terms of Healy & McCann's version of the truth) is not unquestionable.

Ah Loop and TEIN I thought it was a pretty balanced programme and loved the fact that things were put out there that probably majority of people didn't know about. The thing that has put me on a downer (after being on a high after Panorama) was Dr Amaral saying SY were going with abduction and nothing else.
My comment about A Redwood above was a silly way of saying, if he thinks there was an abduction he must believe Tanner flip flopped past G and Jez without being seen. A tongue in cheek comment. I really hope things are moving quietly behind the scenes but I just can't be sure anymore. I'm confused.

Guest Sun 29 Apr - 12:43

Oh, we're all confused,WJK. Permanently!

**wjk** Sun 29 Apr - 12:49

The End Is Nigh wrote:Oh, we're all confused,WJK. Permanently!

Yep and that was Gerry's plan from the start!
"Confusion is good" Inside the twisted minds of the Madeleine McCann Child Snatchers - Page 2 847843

Guest Sun 29 Apr - 13:23

Ah, but I wonder if St.G has finally confused himself?

His wife (is she, still?) certainly looks to be in a permanent state of bemusement. Not entirely of this world.

**kitti** Sun 29 Apr - 13:52

He says how the abductor got in but doesn't state how he got out.

He says that they had a car but why go right into the path off GM/Wilkins ...who could off been heard talking and the 'lookout' must off peeped round the corner to make sure know one was coming up the road in preparing for Madeleine to be carried towards the the smith sighting......why not park a way up the road to the left then drive away....

Well respected ...not anymore dear.

SteveT Sun 29 Apr - 15:38

Someone has just topped up their pension pot!

**kitti** Sun 29 Apr - 18:50

Apparently.....hes a mate off redwood.....he, with redwood , were on the dando case ..

Sponsored content