McCann Hate Campaigners & I Meet

Perhaps she should off renamed it.....Madeleine McCann justice campaign....but then again, know body would really be that interested in reading it, would they .

What a curious article - it seems to be an extreme reaction to finding out that there are actually a really significant number of folk who do not see the "yes, they can see they could have exercised better judgement over childcare" thing as balancing out the "they (Healy & McCann) have suffered enough as a result" equation as suitably resolved.

The Author needs to realise - and a good way of starting that process would be to read her own words several times in order to notice how little she mentions Madeleine herself - that being sceptical about Healy & McCann's stories is not a "Hate" campaign but a desire to seek truth where it is clear it is being well hidden.

It is disingenuous to take the activities of a few doubters and to use them to tar the rest of us with the same brush. If you do that, surely the same argument applies to the activities of a few of those who unswervingly believe Healy & McCann and will not permit themselves to be swayed by the facts?

Well said TEIN - and welcome back from your recent exile without your computer!

Maybe one day the blog writer will have time to read the reams of evidence in this unique case and will realise that the real haters are not the McCann sceptics but the minority of their supporters who will stop at nothing to discredit the doubters.

It may be awhile before she finds the time though as I see that she has 6 children and suffers from bipolar disorder!

Not Born Yesterday wrote:Well said TEIN - and welcome back from your recent exile without your computer!

Maybe one day the blog writer will have time to read the reams of evidence in this unique case and will realise that the real haters are not the McCann sceptics but the minority of their supporters who will stop at nothing to discredit the doubters.

It may be awhile before she finds the time though as I see that she has 6 children and suffers from bipolar disorder!

I agree about the real 'haters.' There is a person using multiple IDs to comment on HiDeHo's videos, calling all who disagree paedophiles. Hasn't she got a friend who could whisper the word 'libel,' in her ear?

I was wondering about the question of libel but would it apply if the person being insulted is known only by a screen name (e.g. HiDeHo) and most people won't have the faintest idea who that person is in the real world?

When the likes of Murat fan hack into people's computers to try to identify who they are, that's another story entirely.

I should not have thought that the definition of "Paedophile" includes such elements as:

Caring about the Welfare of Children
Caring about minimum acceptable standards of Parenting
Caring about minimum acceptable standards of Childcare when the Parents are absent
Caring about the truth behind the disappearance of a Child

I could go on. Usually do. No need - it's all so straightforward: Decency and Compassion, not unswerving adherence to a fable not borne out by any supporting intelligence, information or evidence.