A list of people who 'hate' the McCanns.

I was surprised to learn that someone has compiled this list - I've copied this from CmoMM because both Panda and Cherry1 are listed on this.
Didn't know you 'hated' the McCanns, rather than hating injustice and lies. Still, since their names were mentioned, I feel it should be posted here.

quote:
Tony Bennett wrote:
Yes, this is the 'Hate List':

http://mccannhateexposed.pbworks.com/w/page/50566485/Hate%20Campaign#RosalindaVHuttonnbsp

I can understand Christobell giving it that title, because the article opens with a quote from the Daily Mail saying that the McCanns have been victims of a 'hate campaign' - the article does indeed suggest that folk like me, Pat Brown and Christobell are 'haters'

unquote

Tigger wrote:


Thanks, I don't know what Panda and Cherry1 have done in particular to earn the status of 'haters' (both from MM) . Tony has the honour to appear as both a known and an anonymous hater. interesting to see that your tweets, clearly stating your name are regarded as anonymous.

Not by any means a balanced account, just a collection of internet posts without a clear objective. The compiler has picked up posts from various sites and newspapers.
It's basically a list of people who don't agree with the official version of events as told by the McCanns, none of the versions I should say, since there are so many versions of the 'truth' as well as the book which is an 'account' of the truth. Not the actual truth but yet another version.
unquote

____________________

make sure you get a screen shot of this ppl, it might well be worth keeping.

It is another attempt to hound people off the forums to try and stop them posting, one of the
pros has just gone for me on twitter, two were doing it yesterday. I dont hate the mccanns and anyone who dares question the lies and discrepancies are branded as haters, there are whole lists of antis on the net who have been branded haters of the mccanns.

Just to give you one example

yesterday on twitter I posted that I hoped 2013 was the year when we would see both the Daniel Morgan and Mccann coverups exposed.

I was then attacked for saying that and called evil low life troll!

another one then said that was too good for me being called an evil low life troll, I was actually low life scum who torments the family!

It is interesting that these attacks against me and the attack by a member of this forum on twitter today spreading malicious lies, has coincided on me posting more regularly on the mccann case on here. This person and their mates hounded me off here before and are obviously not pleased that I came back on this forum.

All I and others have ever been interested in is the truth - I have never in my life tormented anyone, if the mccanns dont want people to question their behaviour then they should not tell lies, numerous different versions of what happened, condemned themselves by their own words in book, interviews, statements etc. They need to take responsibility for their own actions.

This has gone too far and now have actually discussed this with b/f who is a copper, and been advised to make a formal report against one person to the police.

Not in relation to me but in relation to another poster they have even posted
up details of where the person works and what they do for a living!

It's not much of a list. I thought that anybody who dared criticise the McCanns was also automatically a "hater", in which case I would've expected "ze list" to be at least three times as long.

On the other hand, the Lioneds, Pandas, AnnaEsses, Gillyspots and JillyCLs of the world are sad, inadequate souls whose lives are almost certainly lacking in love, respect, companionship and usefulness. Some of them are mentally challenged, others are clearly mentally ill as they have put the McCanns foremost in their every thought and action for five whole years.

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/post138906.html#p138906

I needed that!

Anyone who dares to challenge the mccanns are branded as mentally ill.

cherry1 wrote:On the other hand, the Lioneds, Pandas, AnnaEsses, Gillyspots and JillyCLs of the world are sad, inadequate souls whose lives are almost certainly lacking in love, respect, companionship and usefulness. Some of them are mentally challenged, others are clearly mentally ill as they have put the McCanns foremost in their every thought and action for five whole years.

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/post138906.html#p138906

And Jayelles knows this because?..........

Posted by Jayelles » Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:40 pm

Now she posts about obsession in posting. She joined that place I see on the 7th of January last year and has made 6402 posts. She must be very devoted to the McCanns.

January 1st - New Year - new pro campaign.

No matter - later this month there will be much bigger fish to fry.

As the song says: 'Throw back the little ones and pan-fry the big ones ...'

Well i make no secret of hating 'parents' who don't look after their kids properly.why should we like them ?
Most children,particularly those aged under four,are not equipped to look after themselves,they are dependant on their parents to keep them safe.
The mccann parents went on holiday with three children and came home with two because they failed in their parental responsibilities.
We may all have shown some sympathy had that been caused by a momentary lapse and some expression of remorse,but that was clearly not the case.

A good start to the New Year!

I don't suppose that the pros will ever grasp the irony of calling McCann doubters "haters" when they are so full of hate themselves.

I am not a hateful person and anyone who knows me personally will agree. Cherry1, I know what you mean. I recently posted an innocuous comment on a non-UK based forum recommending that people read the PJ files and other information on the Internet. The replies I got really shook me - to the effect that there are no words to describe how vile a person I am.

Were this a straightforward missing child case (even if caused by neglect) I would have nothing but sympathy for the parents, but the McCanns' behaviour from Day One (long-term plans for fund-raising, a dodgy company set up in record time, not managing to hide that this is all a big joke to them, etc) makes it clear that something is very wrong here and, even worse, nobody in authority is prepared to do anything about it.

Not Born Yesterday wrote:A good start to the New Year!

I don't suppose that the pros will ever grasp the irony of calling McCann doubters "haters" when they are so full of hate themselves.

I am not a hateful person and anyone who knows me personally will agree. Cherry1, I know what you mean. I recently posted an innocuous comment on a non-UK based forum recommending that people read the PJ files and other information on the Internet. The replies I got really shook me - to the effect that there are no words to describe how vile a person I am.

Were this a straightforward missing child case (even if caused by neglect) I would have nothing but sympathy for the parents, but the McCanns' behaviour from Day One (long-term plans for fund-raising, a dodgy company set up in record time, not managing to hide that this is all a big joke to them, etc) makes it clear that something is very wrong here and, even worse, nobody in authority is prepared to do anything about it.

Spot on NBY, not only do nothing about it, but actively support them.

I was under the impression that those of us who don't swallow the former Arguidos' account (Or, should I say, accounts - for they are many and varied) do so because of the inconsistencies, the obfuscation, the contradictions, the findings of the PJ, the lack of intelligence (I hesitate to use the word "evidence" as it seems to cause palpitations in some) regarding an abduction ........................

In other words, there is so much still to be explained in a coherent and credible way.

These folk who simply denigrate others - apparently for the sake of it - without actually engaging in debate or exercising the basic human curiosity that rings bells when suspicion is aroused, seem to lack self-awareness: As my mother used to say "Just listen to yourself!".

And what on earth is this "hater" business? Is it "yoof speak" or what? Such extreme emotions are certainly not part of my life, or of anyone I know.

I do wonder - and worry - if those people have lost sight of the crux of what we are about: Keeping the memory of Madeleine McCann in the public eye in the hope (vain though it sometime seems) that her disappearance can eventually be cogently and truthfully explained and the culprits brought to book.



Finally, Happy New Year to all the Gregorian Calendar followers here. Luckily some of us of other persuasions have an extended celebration starting on the 21 December each year!

For info what they are writing about us all

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/


(have put link as apparently they feel that copying their posts onto here is breach of copyright, a bit odd that as I have seen as have others that the hates sites have very often copied posts of the forums which do not support the Mccanns, so I rather feel they have dropped themselves in it here yet again! However, if that is correct then I am more than happy to apologise profusely)

I see they are so stupid that they havent even realised that next to my twitter name it actually gives my name so everyone knows who I am on twitter!!

They fail to say that majority of my posts on MM have been on the games threads, music threads and sports threads just as majority of my posts on MCF are on the music threads and sports threads.

recently have been posting more on here on the Mccann case, suddenly I am then targeted - they are obviously worried. I hve been told from others that some of the worse offenders are already being investigated by the authorities.

I have never posted abusive or threatening posts on the mccann case, in the beginning I had every sympathy with the parents like everyone else did, it was only as things unravelled that I could clearly see something was wrong, then added to that we had the lies, discrepancies, not things we are making up but all the evidence of that is factual. When I have disagreed with pros I have tried to so so politely and not resort to their vile name calling, in fact a while ago when I was posting on Jills site it was even mentioned by one of the pros that others should disagree politely as I had done. I have never got involved in the disgusting abuse that goes on and I dont believe that it is right or necessary WHOEVER does it, I dont believe that antis should post abuse and I dont believe that pros should post abuse.

I have been accused of lying by saying the wall and curtain was washed, this information I put on the forum in good faith, having researched a lot and saw that those famous searchers of the truth for Madeleine had said it, and I believed what they had written. A lie is when someone knowlingly says something they believe to be untrue which I have never ever done and never would do. If I write something that is based on research and knowledge of the case that I have every reason to be true that is not a lie. I have never had any problem in someone pointing out to me if anything I have said is incorrect.

They have said I count abuse as someone highlighting my 'lies' - I count abuse as being called low life evil scum, and every other name under the sun that I have been called, I call abuse people posting up in public which is also libel, complete lies about me. That is abuse.

I will give you an example of lies which were put out on twitter, I was supposed to be on facebook and references were made to postings on my page - at that time I had NO postings that I was aware of on my page and even went to check that out. They looked for a cherry berry on face book and came up with a different cherry berry who they said was me. It was then put up that I worked at a place I had never ever heard of, then told on facebook I was mentally ill, when I am not, I was then told on facebook I had ruined the lives of my children!! that would be a bit difficult since I dont have children!!

These people have made up lies about me on twitter, (copies of some of these made by one of our forum members who is also a member of the hate site have been directed to the authorities). Unfortunately for that person, she then got pilloried by numerous posters on twitter who also have copies of her disgusting SKY forum posts as well and who know her to be the liar she is. I have never been interested in anything other than justice for Madeleine in this case, but there comes a time when people overstep the mark, when this cant continue. I am aware another poster who had her work details and photo put on the net has reported these people and been told the authorities are aware of them and what they are doing. The authorities now have some more info to add to it.

On their hate site they accused Tony of writing a letter he never wrote, I put on this forum evidence of that, Tony knew nothing about the letter they accused him of writing. Yet although they knew that and had read what I had written on their own forum and on here when one member accused him of writing it, nobody had the decency to apologise and they left the information up on their forum saying he had written the letter. The same person on here who accused Tony of this is the same person who has orchestrated the recent campaign against me.

These people are totally sick, if you see the way they refer to people in general who have disabilities, mental illness, their glorifying of Jimmy Savile etc., their many viscious attacks against other posters searching for truth and justice and the sad thing is that the mccanns are well aware of the way their supporters are behaving but have not come out and said it is unacceptable and needs to stop.

We are all pilliored for telling so called lies (which happen to be facts) yet not once have I ever seen any of them question the fact that in Kate's book she says one thing, entirely different from her statements and interviews, that they say one thing in one interview and something entirely different in the next, not once have they questionned what we all know to have been downright lies and discrepancies on the part of the Mccanns, Now why would that be if they had any real genuine interest in finding out the truth about what happened to Madeleine.

This is a game to them, some of them come on here as our forum members, trying to not give themselves away but we all know who they are and they are fooling nobody.


just for the record what I accused Mccans of is lying, telling different versions of the story, contradicting themselves and knowing more than they are saying.

they are questionning my name cosy ring on twitter, the reason I chose that name is from what I know and from what I have been told, I believe paedophilia to be very relevant to this case, and it is well documented the reasons for that, one being to the police surprise Gerry going around mentioning paedos when Madeleine could have wandered off.
My use of that name was me saying - as far as I believe I feel that paedophilia is involved in this case. Paedophiles get away with what they are doing because they are - a cosy ring - that is they cover each others backs, they put people who are paedos into positions of power, politicians, like top people in Police, Social Services, Health Authorities, Judges, etc., we have seen many examples of judges actually blaming the kids for being abused! One of the reasons that victims of abuse are often left having nowhere to go is that the paedos are being protected by some police, so paedos are most definitely a cosy ring, where they protect one another, watch each others backs, look after each other etc.

Again just for the record I have neve accused the mccanns of being paedos or their mates of being paedos, what I have said based on knowledge of the case that I feel, that paedophilia is at the heart of this case, that is my opinion, my belief based on reasonable knowledge of this case, not least the fact that the mccanns have on a number of occasions brought paedophilia comments into the case and also in light of the Gaspar statements. I cannot state that as fact and never have done, I am giving an opinion which may be proved right and may be proved wrong. In a free democratic society I am entitled to do so. Anyone who dares to raise the issue that paedos may be involved is then labelled by the pros a paedo so by their own logic then ............ the mccanns themselves have raised the issue so are they calling them paedos! - Not as clever as they think are they and the fact that they attack people so visciously for raising it is also an indication that we could well be on the right track.

What people are not entitled to do is libel other people, abuse other people, harrass other people, that is against the law and against Malicious communications act and that is what the pros have done.

The McCanns, their cronies and hired hands do seem to have a sure-fire way of inducing negative emotions in others. Whether this is an innate ability, or a calculated predetermination to provoke, frustrate and enrage, I know not. But the end result is the same.

At least it is at my house ......


Hi TIEN and greetings!
The extended Yuletide has much to recommend it!
Chez moi there is an extra celebration - the Winter Solstice coinciding with OH's birthday - and more so this year because of The-End-Of-The-World-That-Never-Was!

Cherry1.

There's that old saying that names can never hurt you. True, not physically, but I find it hard not to be upset by the vile things that the worst of the McCann trolls come out with.

The McCanns have never as far as I know made a public announcement deploring the behaviour of the sewer rat element of their supporters and that speaks volumes for the sort of people that they are. Ye gods, I'd be horrified if creatures like Jayelles and muratfan thought I was wonderful!

I've had a mention, am I famous now. And yes he/she is quite correct I did make a mistake it is two years not one, but eh for those who are my friends they will know that 2012 has been somewhat of a blur, and no I didn't enjoy the festive season in the way he/she implied re alcohol, i enjoyed it because I am still alive.
So apologies to my fellow posters on MM for my mistake and also apologies to Jayelles , and I am not a mental midget, how very discriminative about people who do have mental problems and/or those of diminished stature.

I'm sure there are plenty of rational people who genuinely base their opinions on sympathy for a family who have suffered tragic loss (factually correct, whoever is culpable), and consequently treat any other point of view as being hostile or indefensible.

And, of course, it behoves those who generally prefer to believe the Police also to consider whether that view is misplaced.

I have constantly and repeatedly questioned my own opinions about what happened to Madeleine and done my level best to take into account statements that run counter to the Police files, but looking at the whole picture in such a dispassionate way merely reinforces the unlikelihood of the solution lying elsewhere than the Family themselves.

Do this small minority of people who so despair of anyone who is inclined to believe a different truth also sit back on occasion and wonder if there might be a grain of doubt about their own views?

Worst for me is the implicit condoning of truly appalling parenting: To me it matters not a jot about who the Parents are, what their Occupation is, who they know etc >>> All that matters is common decency and caring for the defenceless and the innocent.

Bobsy wrote: I've had a mention, am I famous now. And yes he/she is quite correct I did make a mistake it is two years not one, but eh for those who are my friends they will know that 2012 has been somewhat of a blur, and no I didn't enjoy the festive season in the way he/she implied re alcohol, i enjoyed it because I am still alive.
So apologies to my fellow posters on MM for my mistake and also apologies to Jayelles , and I am not a mental midget, how very discriminative about people who do have mental problems and/or those of diminished stature.

Stay strong Bobsy.

wjk wrote:

Bobsy wrote: I've had a mention, am I famous now. And yes he/she is quite correct I did make a mistake it is two years not one, but eh for those who are my friends they will know that 2012 has been somewhat of a blur, and no I didn't enjoy the festive season in the way he/she implied re alcohol, i enjoyed it because I am still alive.
So apologies to my fellow posters on MM for my mistake and also apologies to Jayelles , and I am not a mental midget, how very discriminative about people who do have mental problems and/or those of diminished stature.

Stay strong Bobsy.

Will do wjk, will take more than someone calling me a mental midget to ruin my day. I have apologised for my mistake to fellow posters and also the person, don't know whether it is a man or woman, who posted about it.
I must just add that in the early days when I was very much a supporter of the parents McCann and donating to the fund, I was never vindictive towards those from other fora who blamed the parents for their lack of care towards their children, actually I agreed with them.
Ah well I can do no more.

These people need to learn that if any poster feels that someone has written something untrue on the forum all they have to do is politely point it out and the reason why they feel it is untrue and I for one would apologise if unknowingly I have repeated something that turns out not to be true as would most reasonable people. there is no need to run over onto the hate sites and twitter and start slagging people off,there is no need for nastiness. People are entitled to have different views and no need to abuse people because of it. It is a New Year and would be great if people could debate in peace and harmony.

Are you all really that bothered about anything that that obnoxious shower think?

Not really but when there has been a three year hate campaign against people it can
get a bit much but the fact they have overstepped the mark this time and given
more information which has been passed on, they have shall we say well and truly
shot themselves in the foot!