Michael Shrimpton Interview- Bristol Community Radio

[jd16]

With acknowledgement to the David Icke forum, this a radio interview broadcasted on Bristol Community Radio on 11th January 2013 by Michael Shrimpton, a barrister specialising in national security and intelligence law, who negotiated the national security aspects of the Pinochet case with the late Lt-General Vernon Walters, formerly Deputy Director of the CIA. He has represented and advised intelligence officers and is believed to have close connections to a number of Western intelligence services. He claims in this radio interview that jimmy saville supplied young children to the then Prime Minister of the UK, Edward Heath, for sexual abuse and Heath had these kids thrown off the boat and killed after he abused them. There is a lot of evidence to support this claim

He goes on to claim that Dr Kelly was murdered, Dianna was murdered and that Robin Cook was murdered as he was about to expose the Dianna murder (what the hell is going in our establishment!)

This interview imo is the start of 'operation don't blame us guv blame him". A typical British trait in all sides of its society. They know the evidence is out there that shows who exactly is the guilty parties in all of this, and it is getting too strong so operation denial has begun imo. In all these atrocities he is claiming all of this is the fault of the Germans. Erm, if Edward Heath (UK citizen) ordered and had supplied to him by jimmy saville (UK citizen) young children onto his boat so he could sexually abuse them and then throw them off to kill them afterwards....is this really the fault of the Germans? this was all UK citizens and not a German insight...come on Mr Shrimpton, please, we are not stupid and can see right through your charade. Do you want to start another war with Germany?

Curiously, he then halfway through brings up Madeleine McCann and says

"In my report to the joint of intelligence committee, in the case of Madeleine McCann, She was going to be abused by a senior member of the European commission in Brussels whose name is known to British Intelligence, I can't identify him in Spyhunter but I know who it is, there is no way that Madeleine could ever be returned alive to her family because the danger would be even at her tender age of 4 she would recognise him and know who was abusing her. So the Germans had to murder her and indeed they eventually did sadly in December 2008"

Now then Mr Shrimpton, you claim that British Intelligence & joint of intelligence committee (i.e. the government) know all about this and know she was killed in December 2008. Baring in mind the very highest level of protection and support the mccanns have always received since 10pm on May 3rd 2007, are you really saying that the mccanns have not been informed about this yet you can tell the nation on a radio station "this fact"? Come on Mr Shrimpton pull the other one it might have bells on it.

If with British Intelligence/government and even a barrister like yourself having this "fact", the mccanns will have been informed and know what happened to their daughter....Doesn't this then make the No Stone Unturned Ltd fund a fraud?

And for 4 years!!! wow! Even to this day, 19th January 2013, the mccanns are begging for monies from the public to 'search' and using tax payers monies to fund a review. This is a serious fraud the mccanns are committing here Mr Shrimpton

If the mccanns were never made aware of your claims, don't you think yourself, British Intelligence and the UK Government are guilty and totally responsible for allowing the public to continue giving their monies to a fund of a child you know is no longer alive to be found? Shouldn't you all be held to account for this?

And all these rehashed Maddie sightings that appear in the media over the past 4 years especially at interestingly certain points on anniversary dates, rehashed sightings such as the taxi driver, António Castela, which when rehashed 4 years later in 2012 had the dates of Maddie being in his cab changed from before to after the abduction time. I quote clarence mitchell on the 2008 version of the same story we were fed" The declarations of Mr. Castela are false. They are a perfect nonsense. He can only be mistaken when he says that at that time he transported Kate and Madeleine with three men. How is that possible, if at 20h35 several witnesses say that Kate and Gerry were sitting down on a table of the Tapas restaurant. It astonishes me that only now, ten months later, he talks about this. These are declarations that only cause pain to Kate and Gerry. The only sign to report is the one she has in the eye.”

But then in the rehashed 2012 version of the very same story which we were fed, he now says "Mr Castela did absolutely the right thing at the time by reporting his sighting to the PJ. It is clearly deeply shocking that he now tells us he has not been interviewed once by a detective in five years. This is exactly the sort of thing that needs to be looked at in the investigative review now being carried out by the Metropolitan Police. Kate and Gerry remain very happy that the Met are performing their role as efficiently as they can."

Which is the correct version? Which version is Clarence Mitchell lying through his teeth with..2008 or 2012? or both? how can anyone take these sightings' seriously and on merit when they completely change from one version to another. If Maddie had been killed by the Germans in December 2008 as you claim you & British Intelligence know, why was the 2012 rehashed version ever released into the public…isn’t this lying at the very least?

I can give you some links to the 2 versions of the very same story
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/taxi-drivers-madeleine-mccann-sighting-ignored-7706974.html
http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/02/taxi-driver-story-and-rogatory-letter.html


Now then, if on the other hand your claim about Madeleine McCann being abused and killed by the Germans in December 2008 are wrong...Why aren't the mccanns suing you? They do to others who purport any theory of Madeleine being dead. You've said on a radio station and we can all hear with your own voice your claims she is dead, and we know you first made these claims a few years back. Further more you say that you are going to make these claims in your forthcoming book 'Spy Catcher". So how come you get to be exonerated by the mccanns from making these claims, whilst at the very same time others (in positions of facts from the actual police investigation which we have all seen and freely available to be read) are being sued and their lives totally ruined?

Just like the António Castela taxi story, this is totally contradictory, inconsistent, and very clearly showing that there is another agenda going on here. One rule for one and one rule for others. if you are right and with the knowledge who knew for 4 years, wouldn't it be responsible and right to help those who are having their lives ruined by the mccanns instead of just letting this happen? After all, all they are trying to achieve is the truth whatever it is and you hold the truth for 4 years, apparently

I find it very curious that in an interview about a UK Prime Minister and the recently outed pedophile, which from the many evidences I have seen have no doubt you are correct on, you bring in the very same breath, Madeleine McCann. I see victims who claim they were used & abused by the saville network bring up Madeleine McCann too. Its all very curious indeed why she is being talked about in events connected to Operation Fernbridge. I agree with another one of your points in your radio interview though, just prior to you bringing up Madeleine McCann, when you say that the perpetrators of these horrendous crimes normally turn to religion to ease this guilt. Just brings to mind the mccanns apparent sudden religious faith they threw down our throats since May 3rd 2007 and asking & calling for priests on the night she disappeared

[Guest]

There is a long early topic about this man.

https://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t4273-what-really-happened-to-madeleine-mccann-according-to-barrister-michael-shrimpton

Is there anybody who takes him seriously? I hope not!

[cherry1]

interesting post jd, and regarding the religious element.

I wonder how long Shrimpton knew about what Heath and his cohorts were up to, I wonder what if anything he did to try and out what was going on.

I dont think there are many people who do not believe that David Kelly, Diana and Cook were murdered.

Seems when people know too much they are bumped off. We also had a while back the three policemen who all met mysterious deaths.

[Guest]

Susn banned this nut job from this very forum in 2009. His stories were getting more and more bizarre. Personally I think he's quite mad. And it would be unkind of us to fuel his sick and twisted fantasies any further. Madeleine's memory deserves better.

[tanszi]

If he knows this to be true and has evidence, why did he not try to stop it at the time, and why has he nbot been questioned about this. Isnt there something in law about being an accomplice just by knowing and doing nothing about such heinous crimes. jimo

[jd16]

The disinfo from the Shrimpton radio interview is exactly how I saw it too. The 3 point summary at the end is exactly what he was trying to do

[Panda]

A load of B****hit and coming from David Icke's blog should have been the clue.

[jd16]

A load of B****hit and coming from David Icke's blog should have been the clue.

The most interesting thing to me is that he brings up the Maddie case. Especially in light that we have all been perplexed for 6 years as to why the mccanns have had this elite governmental protection since day one

Recently things are beginning to make sense, but if we are only really learning some 6 years later...How did gerry mccann know all about it back in May 2007 to scream about Maddie being taken by an international pedophile ring. After all, he was just an ordinary NHS doctor living an ordinary life, apparently

[Panda]

A load of B****hit and coming from David Icke's blog should have been the clue.

The most interesting thing to me is that he brings up the Maddie case. Especially in light that we have all been perplexed for 6 years as to why the mccanns have had this elite governmental protection since day one

Recently things are beginning to make sense, but if we are only really learning some 6 years later...How did gerry mccann know all about it back in May 2007 to scream about Maddie being taken by an international pedophile ring. After all, he was just an ordinary NHS doctor living an ordinary life, apparently

Morning jd16, but DID Gerry know, or was this a Shrimpton attention seeking bit of News. ? I remember all the gossip here when the empty file with Gerry's name on was related to Pedophilia and the next thing David Payne and the infamous actions he and Gerry performed which led to Mrs Gaspar convinced he was a pedophile.

I can't understand Claire Short's reaction to the Bill, she always looked and talked rather masculine , but if these Laws are still ongoing isn't it time for a Nationwide Petition to repeal them? That is the only way to clean up Parliament, I am sure millions of parents do not know about this and would be outraged.

[jd16]

A load of B****hit and coming from David Icke's blog should have been the clue.

The most interesting thing to me is that he brings up the Maddie case. Especially in light that we have all been perplexed for 6 years as to why the mccanns have had this elite governmental protection since day one

Recently things are beginning to make sense, but if we are only really learning some 6 years later...How did gerry mccann know all about it back in May 2007 to scream about Maddie being taken by an international pedophile ring. After all, he was just an ordinary NHS doctor living an ordinary life, apparently

Morning jd16, but DID Gerry know, or was this a Shrimpton attention seeking bit of News. ? I remember all the gossip here when the empty file with Gerry's name on was related to Pedophilia and the next thing David Payne and the infamous actions he and Gerry performed which led to Mrs Gaspar convinced he was a pedophile.

I can't understand Claire Short's reaction to the Bill, she always looked and talked rather masculine , but if these Laws are still ongoing isn't it time for a Nationwide Petition to repeal them? That is the only way to clean up Parliament, I am sure millions of parents do not know about this and would be outraged.

I think Shrimpton is very clearly on a defensive mission, as when this interview was made it was when operation fernbridge was announced, and they know the evidence is on the net which the police have and are investigating i.e they know they are in grave trouble in keeping this covered up now. But the operation fernbridge evidences have none to do with the mccanns so I am very curious why he is bringing them up in this interview (I know really )

I must admit I was surprised by clare short opposing this Bill that was protecting against child abuse....But then again nothing our elite governments have been doing the past 40 odd years surprises me now. Infact its starting to alarmingly become the norm. It seems you have to have blackmail material on you to make it as a government minister, otherwise you will always be on the back benches

[Panda]

I don't ever remember Politics being so seedy and corrupt as they are today, or maybe it is the internet making all this information available. I bet Alan Lerners Lee did not envisage the downside to his invention opening up the world. Pornography, fraud, shop closures and job losses etc.

[matthew]

Added to the list of not explaining a cadaver dog alerting in an apartment where Maddie went missing
He seems to know a lot on the secret services so he must know that disinfo is a tool to be used to hide what needs hiding,HDLG was all Dead Ted Heath so no need to look into this anymore...thankyou very much

[Sponsored content]