KM in Portugal.

kitti wrote:I have been thinking about the Amaral vs McCann libel case and wondering why the mccanns wanted to settle and I think they're playing for time.......they are waiting for SY to present the review clearing the Mccanns off any involvement in madeleines disappearance and then they will take this to portugal and present it when the court case starts.


Hope I'm wrong.

Kitti I sincerely hope that the case will be in Portugal in front of three Judges as if in the UK the McCanns will say they cannot have a fair trial as the jury would know about the case. And who has made sure of that at every turn?

What I mean is.....they will use the review ...if SY decide that they are innocent off any wrong doing...to prove that they were not involved and Madeleine is alive....that will be their defence against amaral saying they were involved and Madeleine is dead..to get their 1.2m

kitti wrote:What I mean is.....they will use the review ...if SY decide that they are innocent off any wrong doing...to prove that they were not involved and Madeleine is alive....that will be their defence against amaral saying they were involved and Madeleine is dead..to get their 1.2m

Oh I see. I don't think they will try any more with GA, they know he is sticking to his guns. Surely Kitti if we can see it from the files that are released then surely SY can as they will have all the evidence. I just hope they are taking all this time to prepare an absolute water tight prosecution.

Why come out with a stupid....'she could be alive or she could be dead' when it's obvious she died...we can see it but what is the reason SY DON'T want to see it .

kitti wrote:Why come out with a stupid....'she could be alive or she could be dead' when it's obvious she died...we can see it but what is the reason SY DON'T want to see it .

The minute Redwood decided to give those stupid interviews, he was left with little option but to make that statement.

If he chose to say she was alive, he must have absolute proof that she is. If he chose to state she was dead, again he should have absolute proof. If they have absolute proof what is stopping them making an arrest ?

So the big question is why he put himself in such a position as giving those interviews in the first place.

kitti wrote:Why come out with a stupid....'she could be alive or she could be dead' when it's obvious she died...we can see it but what is the reason SY DON'T want to see it .

It always comes back to who is being protected, in my opinion anyway. I don't and have never believed that all this effort, their very own government provided liaison person and the six years of disingenuous smoke and mirror pantomime stories, would be laid on for a pair of ten a penny doctors. But, that's just my view.

'conspiracy of silence'.....Yorkshire television went to the USA and made a documentary and it was banned.



Go look at it on YouTube .....the cover up was done because the abusers were in the police force, politicians and people high up....people were murdered because they spoke out, a women was imprissoned because they said she was lying...can you believe that......the newspapers said the abused children were lying about the abuse....everyone from the police to the CIA were in the cover up....and it's still covered up.