Blacksmith

12th October 2013.



Acts of faith

The Blacksmith Bureau had a single, polemical, purpose – to help Goncalo Amaral in every honest way it could against the activities of two ruthless con-artists too deep into their scam ever to get out: using the funds they'd conned from the public with their false claims they ambushed and tried to destroy him because they knew silence was tantamount to accepting the truth of what he wrote.
Now it’s different. The Interrupted Investigation is about faith, not certainty, that if the truth is laid out for anyone to read it can help the cause of justice.
There are no conspiracy theories here, no belief in political interference, no assertions, no claims of inside knowledge. When I make interpretations they are solidly grounded on those facts. Since 2010 neither supporters of the McCanns nor Kate McCann herself (“it’s just a rumour”) have been able to rebut, let alone refute, any of the examples I give of the McCanns’ constant lying and plotting in their own, very mysterious, interests.
They all avoid the actual accusations I make, from the fact that the co-author of the Archiving Summary swore on oath that they had lied about events on May 3 2007, to the fact that Kate McCann did not turn down her lawyer’s suggestion of a possible plea bargain with the police in September 2007 (read Madeleine, page 243, paragraph 2 very carefully); that, for exactly the same reason (neutral witnesses present to correct the record on oath if necessary) Jane Tanner neither confirmed nor denied identifying Robert Murat as the abductor to Leicester police, through to the fact that they are lying now, after Kate McCann attempted too late to save herself by settling with Amaral before he could set in train the mechanisms that may expose her. Soon, God willing, one at least of them will have to answer for some of those lies in the witness box in Lisbon.
I’ve made it clear that any time one of the Team McCann or the Tapas 7 members, or lawyers acting on their behalf, point out, with evidence, errors in my claims I will immediately withdraw them. They never ring.
So one goes on laying out the facts in the possibly vain hope that not just critics or enemies of the couple but ordinary people, including journalists who were conned, will do what the supporters and shills can’t bring themselves to do: accept the truth.

The latest from Blacksmith - an excellent read.

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

Light and dark

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/

A great article! ".....Madeleine McCann's pathetic but dangerous legacy - the sticker books...."

agree. I always read Blacksmiths blogs and im never disappointed.

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

Tumbling

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/tumbling.html


Thursday, 17 October 2013

The man who never was

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/

I have been in cyberlove with Blacksmith since the first time I 'met' him.
I'm a sapiosexual.
I find deep intelligence more attractive than any other feature of a man.
I'm in awe of him. *blushes*.

Of course most of the MSM journalists – those who don’t go to prison – will cover their tracks. Some of them, believe it or not, will try and write books about the affair. But not the worst, most cynical, liar of them all, the one who sold his soul, and sold out a child, for his own fame. The one who, unlike the Tapas 9, didn’t even have the defence of necessity and self-preservation.

Your political career is dead before it starts, chum.



Couldn't happen to a better person the arrogant buffoon.  

Yes im in love with intellect too. I think all involved with get theirs, karma!

the slave wrote:I have been in cyberlove with Blacksmith since the first time I 'met' him.
I'm a sapiosexual.
I find deep intelligence more attractive than any other feature of a man.
I'm in awe of him. *blushes*.

I have never been a fan but i am warming to his humour recently,i like the simplicity of this....

that conservative party candidate Clarence "Freak" Mitchell.

As for your sexual preferences i fear you will find me a bit lacking as i am a bit thick.  

Why has it taken so long for the truth to be revealed??? We knew, in the beginning that the Ambassador John Buck, sent by Tony Blair to help the McCanns advised the Foreign Office of discrepancies in the Tapas Ststements. We were told that Oldfield had returned to Portugal to amend his Statement , We knew that the Fund was being abused , we witnessed the Press, especially the Express paying close on £1 million for libelling the Tapas group . Yet in 6 years , not ONE investigative Newspaper tried to investigate the McCanns !!!!!!

Please can someone be kind enough to post
More info on the plea bargin. I dont have thr book for reference. Any speculation too.
Many thanks.

Friday, 18 October 2013
The long Calvary of Gerry & Kate

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/the-long-calvary-of-gerry-kate.html

Saturday, 19 October 2013
Another comments issue

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/another-comments-issue.html

Some great "comments" like this one:-

Since going through some traumatic episodes I have become a Quaker, learned Humility and moved closer to God. Madeleine is close to my heart. Now will you shut the fuck up?

Rebekah B. Rollright Stones Bail Centre, Oxon."

Saturday, 19 October 2013
More comments & your questions answered

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/more-comments-your-questions-answered.html

Saturday, 19 October 2013
Revelation moments

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/revelation-moments.html


Sunday, 20 October 2013
Without Jane

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/without-jane.html


Sunday, 20 October 2013
Mr Redwood’s new rules

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/mr-redwoods-new-rules.html

Monday, 21 October 2013
Meanwhile…

The Fairy Tale Abductor Giant has been slain.

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/meanwhile.html

So,
Meanwhile a libel trial rolls on in Lisbon. BBC/Scotland Yard's Crimewatch and the official statement by Mr Redwood that the "abductor" seen by Jane Tanner is no longer a person of interest, by virtue of being non-existent, haven't protected the parents or harmfully overshadowed the trial at all. On the contrary they have helped enormously to bolster Mr Amaral's case.

First, the evidence of Mr Flores in court (it'll be in the transcript) that the McCann version was perceived by the police as a childish "fairy tale" has been given further, and probably decisive, strength now that its key character, the Fairy Tale Abductor Giant, has been slain.

Secondly, the "search". In the literal sense of a physical search for Madeleine – prodding the ground, searching deserted buildings, looking for CCTV evidence, searching, it was, of course, all over within days, or at most weeks, of the disappearance and has never been resumed.

Insofar as the word (search) is being used to describe something quite different and non-literal, an attempt, for instance, to track down, or find traces of, an abductor, complete with more and more detailed descriptions of him, the entire effort is now revealed as a complete black-comedy nonsense, a gaffe on such a scale that the world has still not taken it in.

Did Redwood actually say JT's abductor didn't exist, or just that he was not a POI? Either way, not good, but in the first instance very unhelpful especially if the T9 tried to make their "checks" correspond to that sighting so he could have been the one doing the abducting. If, for instance, they all changed their memory or factual recollection of when and where they were to give time for this person to be where jane said he was when she said he was there.

Surely SY cannot just wave it off if the abductor isn't real, if jane didn't see him and the stories of checks don't add up then the parents and their friends were more keen to drum up evidence of why an abduction had HAPPENED, than to find out the facts about when one happened, which doesn't do them any favors in the looking innocent department.

I didn't think Redwood said that Tannerman didn't exist, but that the British Police had contacted several people who'd been in the area at that time whom the PJ hadn't been in touch with and discovered that Tannerman was a completely innocent bloke collecting his kid from the crèche. I'm not absolutely sure he said that bit about the PJ, but someone else may confirm.

the long calvary of Gerry & Kate - ouch.  


Blacksmith has a sharp pen

Wintabells wrote:I didn't think Redwood said that Tannerman didn't exist, but that the British Police had contacted several people who'd been in the area at that time whom the PJ hadn't been in touch with and discovered that Tannerman was a completely innocent bloke collecting his kid from the crèche.  I'm not absolutely sure he said that bit about the PJ, but someone else may confirm.

Well, but if he was an innocent parent then he did not exist as an abductor - that isn't to say JT saw nothing but that she sure didn't see him taking some other child home in madeleine's pajama bottoms.

What would make you change your story, your true factual recollection of what you saw and when, in order to make it correspond with a sighting of someone carrying a child? I mean if you know that she said she saw this at 915 (or whatever time Gerry and Wilkins were out there) then you'd be thinking, but I saw the shutters down at that time, after that time, but then they were open later, so in order to make it possible for this person to have been the abductor I must change my story that I think I did notice that they might be open, after all - isn't that what Oldfield is meant to have done?

He would know what he saw and that if Jane was right and that was Madeleine, that someone else opened the window later and you would wonder why, surely that's a clue.

Sitting down to change your timeline as a group to enfold the possibility of jane's abductor is just very weird, I don't see why you'd do that when it might have been, (and was) someone else carrying their own kid.

I don't think they even believed it was the abductor because if they had, you would think the minute they heard Jane say where he was heading you would run that way hoping to see him, her, a house with a kid crying coming from it, a person you could ask if they'd seen someone come by that way.

And none of them seemed bothered that in order for Jane's story to be corroborated that she saw this person when she was walking past G&Z on the path, Gerry and Jez would both have to lie about seeing her, and neither of them did this.

Is it a case of people trying to make what little (nothing) they know fit the "fact" ? Because the truth is they have no idea who or what was going up or down those streets that time of night because they were in the bar instead of being at home babysitting their toddlers.

Hi widowan - good to see you!


Here's Blacksmith's latest:

Wednesday, 23 October 2013
The Man Who Sold His Soul - Preface

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/the-man-who-sold-his-soul-preface.html

almostgothic wrote:Hi widowan - good to see you!


Here's Blacksmith's latest:

Wednesday, 23 October 2013
The Man Who Sold His Soul - Preface

http://aninspectorcallsyou.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/the-man-who-sold-his-soul-preface.html

Hello again. Wow, he is really sticking with this. Good to "see" you too  

So it looks like Blacksmith got a slap for his previous ramblings and had to apologise to certain people,lets hope he doesn't do a bren.

Hi Lioned. 

I read it as he's been told to stfu for a bit. He might have been a bit too close for comfort and maybe jeopardising the investigation.

Just my take, and Im not usually optimistic.

he has always said he would apologise for anything he said that gave concern. so hes done that. to me the reasons are clear.

I wonder if he will apologise to Clarence 'Freak' Mitchell for calling him nasty names ?  

The bureau disappeared but soon to be resurrected ?

Hi rammy good to see you back.Blacksmith plays the scattergun game,law of averages one day he'll get something right.