Hmm interesting

Yesterday the Mail published two e-fits of the suspect which were released by Scotland Yard. It later emerged they had been produced by private detectives working for the McCanns back in 2008 but were never issued.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2459722/Just-minutes-saving-Maddie-10pm-sighting-suggests-mother-caught-kidnapper-act.html#ixzz2hjYyrPoL
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


So, the e-fits had been produced by the private detectives working for the McCanns....but never issued.....wonder why that would be !

So SY haave traced the man tanner saw....liars


So SY are lying ?

Why?

After 6 years the man has come forward...oh please, SY are taking the piss arent they

That barrel of laughs Andy Redwood managed to keep a straight face when he came out with that yarn; well done that man!

It would be interesting to know when this man came forward to identify himself, given that SY have not been conducting inquiries to date, but have been reviewing existing information.

jassi wrote:It would be interesting to know when this man came forward to identify himself, given that SY have not been conducting inquiries to date, but have been reviewing existing information.

One of the articles in the lead up to the CW programmes said they had already interviewed or re-interviewed over 400 people. Given some of the garbage written in the lead up to the programme that could be garbage too though.

Daily Mail article says Mr Smith identified the man as Gerry but SY are certain it wasn't him. Who told them that?

  didn't the gnr make a statement that Gerry was coming from the direction of the beach back to the tapas reception or am I dreaming again .

quickfingers wrote:Daily Mail article says Mr Smith identified the man as Gerry but SY are certain it wasn't him. Who told them that?

And, in the world of uncertainty, why are the police so certain?

quickfingers wrote:Daily Mail article says Mr Smith identified the man as Gerry but SY are certain it wasn't him. Who told them that?

Gerry.

http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2013/10/15/1226740/040023-dismissed.jpg




Face the man round the other way and he looks like seaside man.


Nice off him to wear the same clothes he was wearing 6 years ago isn't it.

why isn't this person named then, is it because he doesn't want to be or because there would be so much press attention and questions.

mossman wrote:

quickfingers wrote:Daily Mail article says Mr Smith identified the man as Gerry but SY are certain it wasn't him. Who told them that?

Gerry.

 

Picture of Mr Smith in the mail online today

kitti wrote:http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2013/10/15/1226740/040023-dismissed.jpg




Face the man round the other way and he looks like seaside man.


Nice off him to wear the same clothes he was wearing 6 years ago isn't it.

He's still wandering around Luz trying to find his way home from the night crèche. That's the next Andy revelation, he is also the Smith man, he was lost.

margaret wrote:

mossman wrote:

quickfingers wrote:Daily Mail article says Mr Smith identified the man as Gerry but SY are certain it wasn't him. Who told them that?

Gerry.

 

 

Joking aside, all Gerry has to do is say "it wasn't me guv" - just like Lord McAlpine - and everyone in authority believes him implicitly.

The next thing we'll be hearing is that this man, who wasn't Gerry, had been watching Gerry and ensured he dressed exactly the same before he went abducting. The reason being of course to point the finger at Gerry leaving Mr Abductor home and free:haha:  (oh dear I shouldn't laugh, it could happen)

I mentioned this morning About Non abductor keeping his clothes for 6 years this morning and low and behold .....the mail put a page online AFTER that about the clothes lol.