Andy Redwood...?

I would think that anyone who writes to prince charles spouting off about a Maddie suspect there is a high probability that person is a complete loon.

As for Andy Redwood he has taken on a case that some may consider incredibly complex but anyone taking a fresh look at the evidence (such as we've seen) would surely form an opinion quite quickly that the mccanns and some of the group with them are not telling the truth.
Maybe he has to handle 'them' with kid gloves and hope that something gives,he will only get away with that for a limited period until he has to push things on to the next level or conceade that there isnt enough to go on and wind it up.
He has a period coming up through the trial were he can just watch and then he really has to keep the momentum going while the mccanns are on the ropes.

Every time I see deadwood i think off Harry Corbett .



http://www.iandenny.co.uk/sooty01.jpg




https://2img.net/h/i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae327/jyahres/Blog/DSC_9393.jpg

kitti wrote:Every time I see deadwood i think off Harry  Corbett .



http://www.iandenny.co.uk/sooty01.jpg




https://2img.net/h/i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae327/jyahres/Blog/DSC_9393.jpg

Yes, but Harry was the puppet master, I see Redwood more as being a puppet, like Sooty

dazedandconfused wrote:

kitti wrote:Every time I see deadwood i think off Harry  Corbett .



http://www.iandenny.co.uk/sooty01.jpg




https://2img.net/h/i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae327/jyahres/Blog/DSC_9393.jpg

Yes, but Harry was the puppet master, I see Redwood more as being a puppet, like Sooty

Don't you mean Andy Pandy  

mossman wrote:the first few lines of the link in this thread says

It is understood police have confirmed the woman named in the email did work at the resort when Madeleine was last seen 150 days ago.

Well, it all seems recent news are probably based on the same tip, more or less. A man or a woman is not going to change much in this saga.  

At least they can discount tractor man who has been found safe and well
 
 
 

SteveT wrote:FSoares, looks like that suspect was a women.

Hi SteveT....the link didn't work for me , can you copy and paste it here? Ta

I think Redwood has either been told not to find anything which could incriminate the McCanns or is incredibly inept....my vote is A. SY had the groundwork already done by the Portugese Police , the team of 37 Detectives and 5 clerical staff , after over 2 years could only come up with an efit that was apparently drawn by someone else years before.!!!!!!

If the Government is pulling the strings , why would they agree to spend more money on AN INVESTIGATION? That suggested that they were confident that some evidence had been found.....what evidence is that then???

OK,well the majority of members here have gone for, B) A rather pathetic figure just doing as he is told by the champagne swilling corrupt establishment.
A few 'wishful thinkers' have gone for C)
And having gone initially for A) I have now changed my mind several times in the last few days having been the occasional victim of the ludicrous spin taking place in the press,which has now convinced me that DCI Andy Redwood is a genius and truly is as cunning as the most senior professor of cunning at 'cunning university.com'

He is biding his time and will gradually turn the screw on the mccanns and their obnoxious friends until such time as at least one of them will collapse in an exhausted heap of their own spew.

DCI Andy Redwood deserves our full support until such time as we know otherwise.

I agree with 'mossman' and 'lioned's' most recent post... just for the record. I didn't think so initially but I felt that Redwood's vehement comment: 'this case has gone on long enough', or similar words, was spoken from the heart, and without cover up.

FSoares wrote:

mossman wrote:the first few lines of the link in this thread says

It is understood police have confirmed the woman named in the email did work at the resort when Madeleine was last seen 150 days ago.

Well, it all seems recent news are probably based on the same tip, more or less. A man or a woman is not going to change much in this saga.  

Well the cross dresser has not been publicised yet.....so everyone is right.......it will be a man-woman chief suspect, once tractor man is declared no longer of interest  

Lioned wrote:OK,well the majority of members here have gone for, B) A rather pathetic figure just doing as he is told by the champagne swilling corrupt establishment.
A few 'wishful thinkers' have gone for C)
And having gone initially for A) I have now changed my mind several times in the last few days having been the occasional victim of the ludicrous spin taking place in the press,which has now convinced me that DCI Andy Redwood is a genius and truly is as cunning as the most senior professor of cunning at 'cunning university.com'

He is biding his time and will gradually turn the screw on the mccanns and their obnoxious friends until such time as at least one of them will collapse in an exhausted heap of their own spew.

DCI Andy Redwood deserves our full support until such time as we know otherwise.

 

I have considered this option, Lioned, but decided that now's the time to increase the pressure, and not after the fact, when everything's done and dusted, and the gruesome twosome are standing before the Queen.

If I'm wrong about the whitewash, which I absolutely don't believe I am, then DCI Redwood will have the last laugh with my purest of pleasure, and I will instantly become a huge admirer of his slick detective work.  But that's just a pipe dream that I fear will never come to fruition, hence I feel compelled to keep piling on the pressure now, when it counts the most, just as I believe some of the press are finally doing.

You are right WJK No good becoming complacent now. I'm not anyway as I also firmly believe it is a whitewash but so hope to be wrong

fuzeta wrote:You are right WJK  No good becoming complacent now. I'm not anyway as I also firmly believe it is a whitewash but so hope to be wrong

 

Absolutely, this is no time for complacency!

ok Lioned I will do what we must do in times of distress and I throw my full weight and support behind dci redwood. Go for it and have a few more revelation moments Andy

tanszi wrote:ok Lioned I will do what we must do in times of distress and I throw my full weight and support behind dci redwood.  Go for it and have a few more revelation moments Andy

Et tu, tanszi!  

tanszi wrote:ok Lioned I will do what we must do in times of distress and I throw my full weight and support behind dci redwood.  Go for it and have a few more revelation moments Andy

I didn't officially vote, but maybe you can tell by my latest post that I am going with C. Redwood didn't get to where he is without having some type of intuition. I think that all seasoned investigators will have this 6th sense. Redwood has seen the way that the PJ and the UK Liasion Officers did not fare well with the mighty McCanns, thus he knows he must take a different approach. Unfortunately, this case may never be solved, but I think Redwood, like the PJ and UK Liason Officers knows that Madeleine is dead and who is responsible.

pennylane , its until such time as we know otherwise. what I think of him is well known as a tortoise, but I will put that aside and support him until I KNOW otherwise. My full support is in him finding what happened to Madeleine McCann, not in him pussyfooting and snivelling around her parents or hanging it on some one already dead.

tanszi wrote:ok Lioned I will do what we must do in times of distress and I throw my full weight and support behind dci redwood.  Go for it and have a few more revelation moments Andy

Thats the spirit.  

What has moved me away from the 'whitewash' theory for the moment at least is the intensity of the spin !

Why would they need all this spin if it was going to be a whitewash ?

Its easy to wash it away very quickly as i have said before a number of times all they have to do is blame Hewletts Gypsy friend.Sure us internet nutters will cry foul but how can we ever prove otherwise.

tanszi wrote:pennylane , its until such time as we know otherwise.  what I think of him is well known as a tortoise, but I will put that aside and support him until I KNOW otherwise.  My full support is in him finding what happened to Madeleine McCann, not in him pussyfooting and snivelling around her parents or hanging it on some one already dead.

I'm just teasing tanszi xx   

If Redwood's playing a slick game to ensnare the dodgy duo, he won't mind us doubters. It's the final analysis that will make him or break him anyway.

Lioned wrote:

tanszi wrote:ok Lioned I will do what we must do in times of distress and I throw my full weight and support behind dci redwood.  Go for it and have a few more revelation moments Andy

Thats the spirit.   

What has moved me away from the 'whitewash' theory for the moment at least is the intensity of the spin !

Why would they need all this spin if it was going to be a whitewash ?

Its easy to wash it away very quickly as i have said before a number of times all they have to do is blame Hewletts Gypsy friend.Sure us internet nutters will cry foul but how can we ever prove otherwise.

But why would they need all the spin if it isn't going to be a whitewash, unless you are saying that every story is coming from Team McCann?

  pennylane I was happy to explain especially as I have been so vociferous about him.  

I have no doubt the police can spin stories when it suits them but i think most of what we are reading in the rags is coming from the pink freak.

Lioned wrote:I have no doubt the police can spin stories when it suits them but i think most of what we are reading in the rags  is coming from the pink freak.

 

I'm not so sure, Lioned. Tractor man is conveniently dead, and that makes me very suspicious of SY. What did we all say yonks ago, that SY would be looking for a dead paedo! TM aren't making this up.... it's really happening. I think there's a leak and someone's exposing this farce of an investigation (jmo).

pennylane wrote:

Lioned wrote:OK,well the majority of members here have gone for, B) A rather pathetic figure just doing as he is told by the champagne swilling corrupt establishment.
A few 'wishful thinkers' have gone for C)
And having gone initially for A) I have now changed my mind several times in the last few days having been the occasional victim of the ludicrous spin taking place in the press,which has now convinced me that DCI Andy Redwood is a genius and truly is as cunning as the most senior professor of cunning at 'cunning university.com'

He is biding his time and will gradually turn the screw on the mccanns and their obnoxious friends until such time as at least one of them will collapse in an exhausted heap of their own spew.

DCI Andy Redwood deserves our full support until such time as we know otherwise.

 

I have considered this option, Lioned, but decided that now's the time to increase the pressure, and not after the fact, when everything's done and dusted, and the gruesome twosome are standing before the Queen.


If I'm wrong about the whitewash, which I absolutely don't believe I am, then DCI Redwood will have the last laugh with my purest of pleasure, and I will instantly become a huge admirer of his slick detective work.  But that's just a pipe dream that I fear will never come to fruition, hence I feel compelled to keep piling on the pressure now, when it counts the most, just as I believe some of the press are finally doing.

I think exactly the same. It would be lovely if we were totally wrong and off track but I fear that the paint and brushes are sweeping frantically. I would be really happy to be proved wrong, but shan't hold my breath