Shall we have a little bet.
+16
keepingmum
fuzeta
pennylane
malena stool
almostgothic
marxman
kitti
interested
jinvta
margaret
chrissie1
AnnaEsse
Krisy22
comperedna
mossman
MaryB
20 posters
Page 3 of 3
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
Amaral will win, and I believe that for the same reasons that I believe that the dogs findings were accurate.
Kate and Gerry believe it.
Hence all the flying to and from Lisbon, asking to address the court and bully the judge, the "poor me" pieces in the MSM, and all the rest of it. They know it's all going tits up and they're pulling every trick in the book now. Only none of them are working, what a shame.
Kate and Gerry believe it.
Hence all the flying to and from Lisbon, asking to address the court and bully the judge, the "poor me" pieces in the MSM, and all the rest of it. They know it's all going tits up and they're pulling every trick in the book now. Only none of them are working, what a shame.
Guest- Guest
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
The McCanns certainly believed it at the beginning of this year when they caved in and tried to settle out of court.
almostgothic- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 2945
Location : Lost in the barrio
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-03-18
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
The entire McCann case is a complete crock of poo, they know it as does every sane minded person with the ability to read.
Logically they have no case to bring against Amaral who, has plainly been seen to suffer from their actions. That being said who knows what the outcome will be?
Madeleine was in their care when she disappeared, they publicly admitted they left her and her siblings alone on a regular basis and they have walked away Scot free from any form of reproach from any child protection agency in this country or even the EU where Human Right issues are being settled at the cost of £ millions daily.
I'm still doubtful that the court will find for Amaral. Hopefully I'll be proven wrong.
Logically they have no case to bring against Amaral who, has plainly been seen to suffer from their actions. That being said who knows what the outcome will be?
Madeleine was in their care when she disappeared, they publicly admitted they left her and her siblings alone on a regular basis and they have walked away Scot free from any form of reproach from any child protection agency in this country or even the EU where Human Right issues are being settled at the cost of £ millions daily.
I'm still doubtful that the court will find for Amaral. Hopefully I'll be proven wrong.
malena stool- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13924
Location : Spare room above the kitchen
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-10-04
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
Yes, of course they do! Thanks Claudia xxClaudia79 wrote:In fact it's the other way around. They have to prove the book harmed the search.pennylane wrote:I have complete faith in the judge, Panda. She's not a dodgy member of the British establishment, and has shown throughout this trial, that she is astute, knowledgeable, and has a direct, no-nonsense approach to the pathetic, ill-informed rubbish being spouted by the McCanns witnesses. Dr Amaral doesn't have to prove what happened to Madeleine, he only has to prove he didn't harm the search, and thus far, the McCanns have not established a shred of proof that he has in any way, remotely, harmed the search for the child they so heinously let down!Panda wrote:I know WE know what the McCanns are like, but the Judge might see things differently and think the McCanns have been villified , especially the Express suggesting these upstanding Doctors were "swingers". Also, after over 6 years with not a single sighting of Madeleine , that she was abducted for sex and then killed. That is too far fetched for me , you don't just wander into a Holiday Resort and pick out a pretty little girl to snatch.pennylane wrote:To this day, we are still learning of ways the infamous doctors' McCann harmed the search for Madeleine.
Dr Amaral will win the Libel trial!
pennylane- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 5353
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-10
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
I also have complete faith in the judge. She has already shown that she stands no nonsense. I think she is having none of it. She knows it is all a load of tripe. I believe GA will win
fuzeta- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 4231
Location : Beautiful Staffordshire
Warning :
Registration date : 2008-07-24
keepingmum- Elite Member
- Number of posts : 325
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-11-28
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
I'm with you, fuz. She knows exactly whats what!fuzeta wrote:I also have complete faith in the judge. She has already shown that she stands no nonsense. I think she is having none of it. She knows it is all a load of tripe. I believe GA will win
wjk- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 7815
Age : 59
Location : Manchester
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
pennylane wrote:Yes, of course they do! Thanks Claudia xxClaudia79 wrote:In fact it's the other way around. They have to prove the book harmed the search.pennylane wrote:I have complete faith in the judge, Panda. She's not a dodgy member of the British establishment, and has shown throughout this trial, that she is astute, knowledgeable, and has a direct, no-nonsense approach to the pathetic, ill-informed rubbish being spouted by the McCanns witnesses. Dr Amaral doesn't have to prove what happened to Madeleine, he only has to prove he didn't harm the search, and thus far, the McCanns have not established a shred of proof that he has in any way, remotely, harmed the search for the child they so heinously let down!Panda wrote:I know WE know what the McCanns are like, but the Judge might see things differently and think the McCanns have been villified , especially the Express suggesting these upstanding Doctors were "swingers". Also, after over 6 years with not a single sighting of Madeleine , that she was abducted for sex and then killed. That is too far fetched for me , you don't just wander into a Holiday Resort and pick out a pretty little girl to snatch.pennylane wrote:To this day, we are still learning of ways the infamous doctors' McCann harmed the search for Madeleine.
Dr Amaral will win the Libel trial!
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
So why have they spent the entire trial trying to prove that the book harmed them. The not sleeping, the not coping, the depression (yes, I know I'm stretching a point here, please be patient, it'll come!) is not about the search. It's about them and the loss of childClaudia wrote:In fact it's the other way around. They have to prove the book harmed the search.
In fact I think somewhere Kate actually says it's the loss of Maddie that's done it, nothing there about a book at all. Presumably Dr Amaral's got a sharp team who can also find useful little quotes on the internet. And presumably he'll be backing them up. Still waiting for proof of the "plot to kidnap the twins", Michael! And this Judge looks like she will hold you to it. The Photoshop's probably working overtime in Auntie Phil's house even as we speak.
Guest- Guest
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
It's always about them.Iris wrote:So why have they spent the entire trial trying to prove that the book harmed them. The not sleeping, the not coping, the depression (yes, I know I'm stretching a point here, please be patient, it'll come!) is not about the search. It's about them and the loss of childClaudia wrote:In fact it's the other way around. They have to prove the book harmed the search.wouldshould do that to anyone, book or no book, search or no search.
In fact I think somewhere Kate actually says it's the loss of Maddie that's done it, nothing there about a book at all. Presumably Dr Amaral's got a sharp team who can also find useful little quotes on the internet. And presumably he'll be backing them up. Still waiting for proof of the "plot to kidnap the twins", Michael! And this Judge looks like she will hold you to it. The Photoshop's probably working overtime in Auntie Phil's house even as we speak.
After all, it was their holiday too, right?
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
I think their charges are ridiculous.
1. Amaral's Book hindered the search for Madeleine,.
How could it when a) It was published in Portugese b) There were umpteen sightings of Madeleine around the World AFTER the
book was published.
2. It affected the health of the Family. ......how could it when it was published in Portugese?
3. The video was harmful for the twins........they were 4 yrs old and again, the video is in Portugese.
I don't know who advised them on the charges, my guess is Smethurst who works for Kennedy as a Corporate Lawyer. He went to Portugal with Gerry as a Director of No Stone Unturned.
1. Amaral's Book hindered the search for Madeleine,.
How could it when a) It was published in Portugese b) There were umpteen sightings of Madeleine around the World AFTER the
book was published.
2. It affected the health of the Family. ......how could it when it was published in Portugese?
3. The video was harmful for the twins........they were 4 yrs old and again, the video is in Portugese.
I don't know who advised them on the charges, my guess is Smethurst who works for Kennedy as a Corporate Lawyer. He went to Portugal with Gerry as a Director of No Stone Unturned.
Panda- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 67
Location : Wales
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-03-27
Re: Shall we have a little bet.
My money's on Amaral.
Given that TM suppressed their OWN vital evidence for five years. If that didn't damage the search, what did?
I think he's got it in the bag.
Given that TM suppressed their OWN vital evidence for five years. If that didn't damage the search, what did?
I think he's got it in the bag.
wantthetruth- Golden Poster
-
Number of posts : 934
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-26
Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum