Will we hear any more about the libel trial

Just got this tweet...needs confirming...

REM ‏@GOSUB3010 53m

#mccann Just heard the Lisbon trial will resume/conclude 25 Feb 2014 source Porto 1578 gar# CdM

and this...

#McCann wanted again to settle - AMARAL REFUSED !! Woohoo go Amaral

whatsupdoc wrote:Just got this tweet...needs confirming...

REM ‏@GOSUB3010 53m

#mccann Just heard the Lisbon trial will resume/conclude 25 Feb 2014 source Porto 1578 gar# CdM

and this...

#McCann wanted again to settle - AMARAL REFUSED !! Woohoo go Amaral

I hope this info proves to be correct. I also wish that Mr. Amaral could "call" on Tony Blair to testify in light of the news today that he was advising Rebekah Brooks on the phone-hacking scandal. I still think the phones of the McCanns' families and friends were hacked despite earlier denials.

They have got to have been hacked, it was "THE" news story of the bloody century FCS!

whatsupdoc wrote:Just got this tweet...needs confirming...

REM ‏@GOSUB3010 53m

#mccann Just heard the Lisbon trial will resume/conclude 25 Feb 2014 source Porto 1578 gar# CdM

and this...

#McCann wanted again to settle - AMARAL REFUSED !! Woohoo go Amaral

Great News if this is true whatsupdoc, that's next Tuesday. The McCanns have been invisible the last few weeks , maybe they are wishing they had not been so greedy, sequestering E1.2 million .!!!! If this date is to close the case, it would appear that neither the McCanns or Amaral will be called to testify.

Looks like there is no date. mccann trolls were just having 'fun', I read.

weissnicht wrote:Looks like there is no date. mccann trolls were just having 'fun', I read.

Thanks weissnicht , there must be a reason for the hold-up and my guess is it is to do with SY's attempt to find these 'persons of interest'.

Panda wrote:

weissnicht wrote:Looks like there is no date. mccann trolls were just having 'fun', I read.

Thanks weissnicht , there must be a reason for the hold-up and my guess is it is to do with SY's attempt to find these 'persons of interest'.

But it has nothing to do with the private vendetta libel case.