Madeleine police face deadline - questioning Portuguese-suspects

Marky wrote:

Judge Dread wrote:

Marky wrote:

Judge Dread wrote:

Marky wrote:

no, didn't think you could.

And just what part of 'We'll just have to wait and see, won't we...' don't you understand...

yet another clever soul who thinks he's smarter than everyone else.

Not everyone... Just you...

troll.

Wanker!

I have shared the possibilities many times Marky over the years - just makes me wonder why you cant come up with them yourself when the clues are there.

cherry1 wrote:I have shared the possibilities many times Marky over the years - just makes me wonder why you cant come up with them yourself when the clues are there.

then why not one more time.

Because I don't dance to the tune of others and it is better for you to exercise your brain Marky

fred wrote:Wanker!

i could spend all day trading these sort of insults with you sweetie but i won't and do you know why? i don't have to.

in the meantime, if you have nothing to add to the discussion but need something to do, you can always kiss my  

cherry1 wrote:Because I don't dance to the tune of others   and it is better for you to exercise your brain Marky  

no surprises there then.

Marky wrote:

fred wrote:Wanker!

i could spend all day trading these sort of insults with you sweetie but i won't and do you know why? i don't have to.

in the meantime, if you have nothing to add to the discussion but need something to do, you can always kiss my  

Ok kiss, kiss, kiss Suppose you are once again being 'ironic' when you said addto the discussion

fred wrote:

Marky wrote:

fred wrote:Wanker!

i could spend all day trading these sort of insults with you sweetie but i won't and do you know why? i don't have to.

in the meantime, if you have nothing to add to the discussion but need something to do, you can always kiss my  

Ok kiss, kiss, kiss  Suppose you are once again being 'ironic' when you said addto the discussion  

on the contrary. you quite often make very good observations on the various issues.

jassi wrote:

Marky wrote:

jassi wrote:The excuse of 'national security' is often invoked when the government wished to conceal something unsavory without having to provide any sort of explanation.
It is hard to determine what it might be in this case without delving into the realms of imaginative thinking.

no, it's not hard at all. the government does not comment on whatever the country's security services are up to at any time for obvious reasons. doesn't follow that there's something to hide.

That might be your opinion, it certainly isn't mine.

should have been more specific. should have added 'appertaining to this case'. make any difference to your post?

Got fed up reading all the above posts, all the insult trading.

All I would add is this. That I think David Cameron must be very, very disappointed to go into the election without an end to this case. I believe he was desperate to get answers so that he could say to the electorate that it was solved 'on his watch'. Therefore, believing that as I do, there is nothing that suggests a cover up. Quite the opposite. What was wanted was an ending, a concrete ending, Madeleine found (dead or alive) just to hopefully put this mystery to bed once and for all. And David Cameron has not got it. I'm not talking about anyone going to court and being charged, that may take years and years. But just that I believe that David Cameron had high hopes that SY could find Madeleine.

LJC wrote:Got fed up reading all the above posts, all the insult trading.

All I would add is this.  That I think David Cameron must be very, very disappointed to go into the election without an end to this case.  I believe he was desperate to get answers so that he could say to the electorate that it was solved 'on his watch'.  Therefore, believing that as I do, there is nothing that suggests a cover up.  Quite the opposite.  What was wanted was an ending, a concrete ending, Madeleine found (dead or alive) just to hopefully put this mystery to bed once and for all.  And David Cameron has not got it.  I'm not talking about anyone going to court and being charged, that may take years and years.  But just that I believe that David Cameron had high hopes that SY could find Madeleine.  

that may still be the case. there may be good reason that it's preparing to wind down. they may just arrive at the same conclusion that the portuguese did. much indicative evidence but not enough to press a case. it may not be concrete but sometimes that's as good as it gets. and hey, he may already be aware of this but he's got bigger fish to fry just now.

Marky wrote:

LJC wrote:Got fed up reading all the above posts, all the insult trading.

All I would add is this.  That I think David Cameron must be very, very disappointed to go into the election without an end to this case.  I believe he was desperate to get answers so that he could say to the electorate that it was solved 'on his watch'.  Therefore, believing that as I do, there is nothing that suggests a cover up.  Quite the opposite.  What was wanted was an ending, a concrete ending, Madeleine found (dead or alive) just to hopefully put this mystery to bed once and for all.  And David Cameron has not got it.  I'm not talking about anyone going to court and being charged, that may take years and years.  But just that I believe that David Cameron had high hopes that SY could find Madeleine.  

that may still be the case. there may be good reason that it's preparing to wind down. they may just arrive at the same conclusion that the portuguese did. much indicative evidence but not enough to press a case. it may not be concrete but sometimes that's as good as it gets. and hey, he may already be aware of this but he's got bigger fish to fry just now.

That would upset a number of McCann supporters who have been doing their best to rubbish the Portuguese police for years.

jassi wrote:

Marky wrote:

LJC wrote:Got fed up reading all the above posts, all the insult trading.

All I would add is this.  That I think David Cameron must be very, very disappointed to go into the election without an end to this case.  I believe he was desperate to get answers so that he could say to the electorate that it was solved 'on his watch'.  Therefore, believing that as I do, there is nothing that suggests a cover up.  Quite the opposite.  What was wanted was an ending, a concrete ending, Madeleine found (dead or alive) just to hopefully put this mystery to bed once and for all.  And David Cameron has not got it.  I'm not talking about anyone going to court and being charged, that may take years and years.  But just that I believe that David Cameron had high hopes that SY could find Madeleine.  

that may still be the case. there may be good reason that it's preparing to wind down. they may just arrive at the same conclusion that the portuguese did. much indicative evidence but not enough to press a case. it may not be concrete but sometimes that's as good as it gets. and hey, he may already be aware of this but he's got bigger fish to fry just now.

That would upset a number of McCann supporters who have been doing their best to rubbish the Portuguese police for years.

of course it would. they are looking for absolution. anything less is eyes on target.