Madeleine McCann latest: are police any closer to knowing the truth? - The Telegraph

Gordon Rayner, Chief Reporter with The Telegraph posted this review of the "search" (dated January 28, 2016) and reports that the search "remains very much active to this day". www.telegraph.co.uk

At least he mentioned that the two British sniffer dogs only gave alerts to Apartment 5A and the Renault car rented by the McCanns.

interested wrote:Gordon Rayner, Chief Reporter with The Telegraph posted this review of the "search" (dated January 28, 2016) and reports that the search "remains very much active to this day".   www.telegraph.co.uk

At least he mentioned that the two British sniffer dogs only gave alerts to Apartment 5A and the Renault car rented by the McCanns.

Thanks for this interested.
But the parents are still not persons of interest.....

malena stool wrote:

interested wrote:Gordon Rayner, Chief Reporter with The Telegraph posted this review of the "search" (dated January 28, 2016) and reports that the search "remains very much active to this day".   www.telegraph.co.uk

At least he mentioned that the two British sniffer dogs only gave alerts to Apartment 5A and the Renault car rented by the McCanns.

Thanks for this interested.
But the parents are still not persons of interest.....

...and never will be

Angelina wrote:

malena stool wrote:

interested wrote:Gordon Rayner, Chief Reporter with The Telegraph posted this review of the "search" (dated January 28, 2016) and reports that the search "remains very much active to this day".   www.telegraph.co.uk

At least he mentioned that the two British sniffer dogs only gave alerts to Apartment 5A and the Renault car rented by the McCanns.

Thanks for this interested.
But the parents are still not persons of interest.....

...and never will be

because it's so much easier to slip a cancer riddled, wheelchair bound paedophile or untraceable gypsies or even a faceless suspect based on the unsupported sightings of a biased witness into a frame, than it is to follow the evidence..

ive just read the article, some good factual information, other not so factual I m just wondering why the article on the 29th it seems to be in solation from any other news media.

Tanzi It is probably because they have plenty of bad news to fill the papers with at the moment. If it had been a slow week, no doubt they would have picked it up to fill the columns

tanszi wrote:ive just read the article, some good factual information, other not so factual  I m just wondering why the article on the 29th  it seems to be in solation from any other news media.

I wondered about the timing as well, perhaps in anticipation of the Lisbon verdict; speaking of which it seems to be taking forever - just like the long awaited arrest of the parents.

Same article re-cycled again, Feb. 5, 2016 at 6:00 PM. But why?????

Perhaps someone knows something, wants it out there and has covered it in a seemingly general article.