‘We must reconstruct Maddie’s fateful night’

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/666015/Madeleine-McCann-anniversary-reconstruction-portuguese-police-chief-Goncalo-Amaral

"Mr Amaral said it was unlikely the suspects would agree to a reconstruction but their parts could be played by police officers.

However, he said it was important the McCanns and their friends, Russell O’Brien and his partner Jane Tanner, Rachael Oldfield and her husband Matthew, David and Fiona Payne and Mrs Payne’s mother Dianne Webster take part. "

....

"The McCanns declined to respond to Mr Amaral’s comments.

However, it is understood they were advised a reconstruction after so many years would be “pointless”.

A source close to the family said: “Kate and Gerry do not wish to engage with anything Amaral says."

I cannot see it happening at all there was the crime watch thing all was asked before and it was a big no no .there is nothing stopping sy and the pj reinterviwing everyone again before the case closes and go from there .didn't RM day he would do if he's game you would think everyone else would-be game .this is where the case started 9 years ago and should end there no loose ends

I think it is noteworthy that James Murray quotes Mr. Amaral as saying: "Reconstructions are very helpful and I believe a full one in this case could be very productive."

Further down in the article, the author writes that Mr. Amaral said it was unlikely the "suspects" would agree (without telling us "in quotes" what exactly Mr. Amaral said regarding the identity of the suspects).

The writer goes on to say however it is important the McCanns and their friends take part, which seems to imply Mr. Amaral separates the "suspects" from this group. I believe the writer is referring to the the burglars that SY consider "suspects".

In any case, in my opinion the McCanns are the suspects in this case and Mr. Amaral was right - the suspects will not agree - they are too busy seething.

interested wrote:I think it is noteworthy that James Murray quotes Mr. Amaral as saying:  "Reconstructions are very helpful and I believe a full one in this case could be very productive."

Further down in the article, the author writes that Mr. Amaral said it was unlikely the  "suspects" would agree (without telling us "in quotes" what exactly Mr. Amaral said regarding the identity of the suspects).

The writer goes on to say however it is important the McCanns and their friends take part, which seems to imply Mr. Amaral separates the "suspects" from this group.  I believe the writer  is referring to the the burglars that SY consider "suspects".

In any case, in my opinion the McCanns are the suspects in this case and Mr. Amaral was right - the suspects will not agree - they are too busy seething.

Yep yep.