Human Rights: Carter-Ruck - Toxic Silence
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Human Rights: Carter-Ruck - Toxic Silence
http://ionglobaltrends.blogspot.com/search/label/Madeleine%20McCann
Monday, December 07, 2009
Human Rights: Carter-Ruck - Toxic Silence
"Legal advice to the Speaker's Office has further compunded fears for free speech in the Commons" The Guardian.
Caroline Davies of The Guardian has an excellent article about the attempt by London lawyers Carter-Ruck to stifle reporting of Trafigura and the Ivory Coast toxic waste scandal. The article focuses on Carter-Ruck's use of a "super-injunction".
Ms. Davies reports "the debate was sparked in September when the Guardian was initially prevented from reporting a question by Paul Farrelly, Labour MP for Newcastle-under-Lyme, which revealed the existence of such an injunction. The super-injunction, obtained by libel lawyers Carter-Ruck, not only gagged newspapers from reporting a leaked study which claimed toxic waste dumped by Trafigura on the Ivory Coast was capable of damaging human health, it also forbade reporting of the existence of the injunction and threatened contempt proceedings if Farrelly's question about it was also published.
It was only lifted after news of the injunction spread across social networking websites."
Read more...Super-injunctions do limit freedom of speech, Speaker's lawyers advise (The Guardian)
On their website Carter-Ruck boasts - "Where consulted before publication under its MediaAlert service, Carter-Ruck is often able to persuade a publisher or broadcaster to change its intended story or even to decide not to publish it at all. If this does not prove possible then the option of obtaining an injunction to prevent publication will be considered."
and..
"We also have considerable experience of working (often alongside PR agencies) for blue chip corporations and other clients facing sustained and hostile media interest."
Such statements could prompt the question, just how much of what is reported in Britain is controlled by the media, and how much is influenced by "silencers" such as Carter-Ruck and others of their ilk, who appear to put profit before hard fought for principals such as democracy, freedom of speech and Parliamentary tradition and rights?
Is Britannia a country prepared to allow such rights to be surrendered to those who fight from behind desks, while her sons and daughters have died - and continue to die - on foreign battle fields in the name of such principals?
Britain and many other nations have battled to give the people of countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan the right to free debate unhindered by the threats of those who gain by silence.
Yet those very same rights and principals are in danger of being surrendered not on Flanders Field, The Somme or Helmand Province - but in the plush offices and courtrooms of dear old London Town.
More i On Global Trends articles relating to Trafigura.
Sunday, November 22, 2009 ( refers to FBI press release marked for "immediate release" Nov 12, reported by the UK media nine days later)
Madeleine McCann: McCann investigator indicted on charges of wire fraud and money laundering
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Pollution: Toxic wastes caused deaths, illnesses in Côte d’Ivoire
Friday, October 24, 2008
Environment: Ivory Coast toxic waste scandal - justice has not been rendered
Friday, October 03, 2008
Cote D'ivoire: Toxic waste criminal investigations may indict higher-ups
Other articles
21 November, 2009
Trafigura waste victims still waiting for compensation (AFP)
12 November, 2009
Toxic waste dump victims pin hopes on 19 November appeals (Amnesty International)
05 November, 2009
Authorities must ensure compensation reaches victims (Amnesty International)
19 August 2008 (IRIN)
UN warns toxic waste still a threat
14 September 2007 (IRIN)
Thousands of toxic waste victims could miss out on compensation
14 February 2007 (IRIN)
Company settles over toxic waste scandal
28 September 2006 (IRIN)
Toxic dumping health-scare over
19 September 2006 (IRIN)
French executives arrested in toxic-waste scandal
18 September 2006 (IRIN)
Clean-up of toxic waste begins
7 September 2006 (IRIN)
Cabinet resigns over toxic fumes scandal
6 September 2006 (IRIN)
Hundreds hospitalised after breathing toxic fumes
Published by i On Global Trends - Mike Hitchen Online - news, opinion, analysis
Monday, December 07, 2009
Human Rights: Carter-Ruck - Toxic Silence
"Legal advice to the Speaker's Office has further compunded fears for free speech in the Commons" The Guardian.
Caroline Davies of The Guardian has an excellent article about the attempt by London lawyers Carter-Ruck to stifle reporting of Trafigura and the Ivory Coast toxic waste scandal. The article focuses on Carter-Ruck's use of a "super-injunction".
Ms. Davies reports "the debate was sparked in September when the Guardian was initially prevented from reporting a question by Paul Farrelly, Labour MP for Newcastle-under-Lyme, which revealed the existence of such an injunction. The super-injunction, obtained by libel lawyers Carter-Ruck, not only gagged newspapers from reporting a leaked study which claimed toxic waste dumped by Trafigura on the Ivory Coast was capable of damaging human health, it also forbade reporting of the existence of the injunction and threatened contempt proceedings if Farrelly's question about it was also published.
It was only lifted after news of the injunction spread across social networking websites."
Read more...Super-injunctions do limit freedom of speech, Speaker's lawyers advise (The Guardian)
On their website Carter-Ruck boasts - "Where consulted before publication under its MediaAlert service, Carter-Ruck is often able to persuade a publisher or broadcaster to change its intended story or even to decide not to publish it at all. If this does not prove possible then the option of obtaining an injunction to prevent publication will be considered."
and..
"We also have considerable experience of working (often alongside PR agencies) for blue chip corporations and other clients facing sustained and hostile media interest."
Such statements could prompt the question, just how much of what is reported in Britain is controlled by the media, and how much is influenced by "silencers" such as Carter-Ruck and others of their ilk, who appear to put profit before hard fought for principals such as democracy, freedom of speech and Parliamentary tradition and rights?
Is Britannia a country prepared to allow such rights to be surrendered to those who fight from behind desks, while her sons and daughters have died - and continue to die - on foreign battle fields in the name of such principals?
Britain and many other nations have battled to give the people of countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan the right to free debate unhindered by the threats of those who gain by silence.
Yet those very same rights and principals are in danger of being surrendered not on Flanders Field, The Somme or Helmand Province - but in the plush offices and courtrooms of dear old London Town.
More i On Global Trends articles relating to Trafigura.
Sunday, November 22, 2009 ( refers to FBI press release marked for "immediate release" Nov 12, reported by the UK media nine days later)
Madeleine McCann: McCann investigator indicted on charges of wire fraud and money laundering
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Pollution: Toxic wastes caused deaths, illnesses in Côte d’Ivoire
Friday, October 24, 2008
Environment: Ivory Coast toxic waste scandal - justice has not been rendered
Friday, October 03, 2008
Cote D'ivoire: Toxic waste criminal investigations may indict higher-ups
Other articles
21 November, 2009
Trafigura waste victims still waiting for compensation (AFP)
12 November, 2009
Toxic waste dump victims pin hopes on 19 November appeals (Amnesty International)
05 November, 2009
Authorities must ensure compensation reaches victims (Amnesty International)
19 August 2008 (IRIN)
UN warns toxic waste still a threat
14 September 2007 (IRIN)
Thousands of toxic waste victims could miss out on compensation
14 February 2007 (IRIN)
Company settles over toxic waste scandal
28 September 2006 (IRIN)
Toxic dumping health-scare over
19 September 2006 (IRIN)
French executives arrested in toxic-waste scandal
18 September 2006 (IRIN)
Clean-up of toxic waste begins
7 September 2006 (IRIN)
Cabinet resigns over toxic fumes scandal
6 September 2006 (IRIN)
Hundreds hospitalised after breathing toxic fumes
Published by i On Global Trends - Mike Hitchen Online - news, opinion, analysis
Annabel- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 3528
Location : Europe
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-25
Re: Human Rights: Carter-Ruck - Toxic Silence
Mike Hitchen is not afraid to report on any contentious matter. It was the might of the internet which led to Carter Ruck doing an about turn. MH's comments are raw and truthful, imo.
tanszi- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 3124
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-09-10
Re: Human Rights: Carter-Ruck - Toxic Silence
Human Rights Act: What the articles say
Article 10: Freedom of Expression(1) Everyone has the right of freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without inference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
(2) The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
Article 10: Freedom of Expression(1) Everyone has the right of freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without inference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
(2) The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
hobnob- Elite Member
-
Number of posts : 431
Age : 60
Location : uk
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-11-17
Similar topics
» Carter Ruck....... Pay cut!
» I have been Carter-Rucked
» Jack Straw to consult newspapers on Carter-Ruck-style 'super-injunctions'
» Do you know your Human Rights?
» Flashmob Carter Ruck 15 Oct
» I have been Carter-Rucked
» Jack Straw to consult newspapers on Carter-Ruck-style 'super-injunctions'
» Do you know your Human Rights?
» Flashmob Carter Ruck 15 Oct
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum