Predictions

carlymichelle wrote:no matter the outcome tommrow im going nowhere!!!

That's the spirit, Carly! And I'm sure you speak for all of us, we're none of us going to walk away - why should we? The more pressure is brought to bear, the more Team McCann try to censor and silence, the more people will wonder what's being hidden, IMO. And the more they'll try to get truth and justice for Madeleine.

mrbrightside wrote:GA losing tomorrow could be the best outcome! As he may well then think stuff this and them and tell us what really happened.

He WONT be able to tell us anything, that is what the mccanns want the book banned for, to shut him up and to fine him everytime he makes a remark about the case, he cant afford to say anything.

kitti wrote:

mrbrightside wrote:GA losing tomorrow could be the best outcome! As he may well then think stuff this and them and tell us what really happened.

He WONT be able to tell us anything, that is what the mccanns want the book banned for, to shut him up and to fine him everytime he makes a remark about the case, he cant afford to say anything.

It doesn't really matter now, anyway. It's out there and they can't shut ALL of us up.

Well if i was GA, and it goes against me tomorrow, i would shout out all i know, and stuff the consequences. As most on here would, if they tried to shut us up too!

Wasn't the judge going to keep the verdict secret? I don't think we'll know anything tomorrow, unless the Mcs give a pressconference with Colgate smiles.....

THE MCCANNS ARE NOT GOING BACK TO LISBON FOR THE JUDGES'S DECISION WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU

I, too, seem to remember that the judges decision is not going to be made public.

However I am confused as to how that will work. Surely even if it isnt, the look on Dr Amaral's face will say it all.

Then if the book is published.....or not published......

Then if Dr Amaral gives interviews.....or doesnt give interviews.......

And oh my word, if this has happened at a temporary injunction hearing WHAT is going to come out in the Libel Trial proper?

Honestly, my head is spinning.

I don't think I've read anywhere that the judge's decision will remain private. But nothing would surprise me in this strange case. Isn't it just a temporary ban again.

Christine wrote:Wasn't the judge going to keep the verdict secret? I don't think we'll know anything tomorrow, unless the Mcs give a pressconference with Colgate smiles.....

a hearing open to the public but the decision closed to the public?

Christine wrote:Wasn't the judge going to keep the verdict secret? I don't think we'll know anything tomorrow, unless the Mcs give a pressconference with Colgate smiles.....

If anyone will be there it will be Joana, she'll be blogging the second the verdict is out of the judges gob!!! Then it will be cyber party time my friends!!

Christine wrote:Wasn't the judge going to keep the verdict secret? I don't think we'll know anything tomorrow, unless the Mcs give a pressconference with Colgate smiles.....

In the pipeline, I believe.