IS IT POSSIBLE

Lea.
I do feel for Mr Amaral and his Family he is putting it all on the line, I am sure he is a strong Man he will not stop.
The McCann's who think they are above the Law have met someone who will not bow down to them, there will be much more to come.
They might have the first Set but they might not win the Match.

Alpine Aster wrote: Lea.
I do feel for Mr Amaral and his Family he is putting it all on the line, I am sure he is a strong Man he will not stop.
The McCann's who think they are above the Law have met someone who will not bow down to them, there will be much more to come.
They might have the first Set but they might not win the Match.

alpine aster,i agree,but i do hope the brave mans health is not at risk,
he has been through a lot and still has a way to go,
i do hope he comes out shining in all of this,
im looking forward to more revelations,im sure theres a lot we havnt heard.

sorry off topic but i have had a point deducted,
have i been a bad girl?
anyone know how this has happened,
have i got a foe?

Lea, I think somebody gave you a negative point for one of your posts on Freja53's thread because there is a red line on the right of the post. I think if you have a green line on a post it means you have received positive points for that post.

The red line just means that someone didn't like your post/think it was a good one. The green lne means the opposite. If someone puts you on their "foe" list it means that your posts don't display to them, so they don't have to read them - and won't, therefore, give you a negative (or positive) mark. I don't know if you can see who has put you on their foes' list?? I presume not.

I was wondering, all the questions on what we could do.

Hypothetically speaking, if there are any lawyers out there:

Would it be possible do you think, if someone had the time and the money, for an ordinary person to sue for the right to buy and read the book?

There's been an awful lot of talk about The Mccann's rights v Amaral's rights.

What about our rights?

Who are the courts to tell us what books we can and can't read, and what information(that, lets face it, does NOT in any way affect National Security) we can and can't have, and who's idea's we can and can't listen too.

Just wondering.

lea wrote:

Lilemor wrote:Dr. Amaral stated: "The survival of my family is being placed at risk".
And he is suffering a persecution.
Says it all...

lilemore,when did Amaral say this?

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2010/02/goncalo-amaral-book-ban-limits-freedom.html

Gonçalo Amaral : 'Book Ban limits Freedom of Expression'
18 February 2010 | Posted by Joana Morais Leave a Comment


The former Judiciary Police inspector stated that the decision to uphold the banning on the book "Maddie - The Truth of the Lie" is «completely out of context»

Gonçalo Amaral considered today the decision to uphold the banning of his book is «completely out of context», in which it is defended the thesis of Kate and Gerry McCann involvement in their daughters disappearence.

After affirming that he will appeal to the ruling, Gonçalo Amaral said that he disagrees with the judge Gabriela Cunha Rodrigues decision, stressing that it reflects "the state where freedom of expression is in Portugal".

"Of course I do not agree with the decision. If we had agreed we wouldn't have opposed to the injunction. This decision places in question and continues to limit my freedom of expression. Therefore, it is completely out of context", he said.

Gonçalo Amaral promises to fight

Outside the courthouse, in Lisbon, Gonçalo Amaral reiterated that the ruling read today, at 7th Civil Court, "is another step" in the battle that he is fighting in court with the McCann couple, parents of the child who disappeared in the Algarve in May 2007.

"We are prepared to go to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary", he said, admitting that he is suffering a "persecution" by the British couple, who have other cases against the former Judiciary Police inspector.

Amaral, who was part of the PJ investigative team set up to find Madeleine McCann, said that "it is the survival" of his family who is being placed at risk.

McCanns trust in Justice

For its part, the lawyer for Kate and Gerry McCann - who on Friday will promote a press conference in London - was glad to see "justice made" by the decision to withdraw from the market the book and the video [DVD] with the same title, based on a documentary broadcast on TVI .

"No one can offend a citizen or citizens who are not convicted in court. This was a good decision. I believe that my clients are now in a position where they can defend themselves in court," said Isabel Duarte, alluding to other actions brought against Gonçalo Amaral, one for defamation, that seeks damages of at least 1.2 million euros, and another for breach of secrecy.

Isabel Duarte said she trusted "the Portuguese courts" and noted that Kate and Gerry "do not know where Madeleine is and even though they live daily with the lies of many, they keep fighting with every strength".

"There are many people organized on the Internet, with hundreds of 'blogs', where they call them all the names. This is bad. My clients struggle against bandits and need support", she said.

The lawyer said she had notified the court decision to the McCanns through a cell phone message and that Kate said: "This is the beginning of a new situation that can reopen the search for Madeleine."

The trial of the injunction, ordered temporarily to 09 September 2009, was held in four sessions in mid-January.

In addition to Gonçalo Amaral, there were also a target Guerra & Paz, the publisher of the book, TVI and Valentim de Carvalho, who sold the DVD broadcast in a documentary on that TV station. All will appeal the decision.


in Sol, Expresso and others via Lusa News Agency

lea wrote:sorry off topic but i have had a point deducted,
have i been a bad girl?
anyone know how this has happened,
have i got a foe?

Don't worry Lea, I gave you the point back to balance it out! There seems to be some funny voting going on on that thread, either somebody doesn't quite know how it works, or somebody is playing silly buggers

How "INDEDPENDENT" IS the ECOHR (freemasons at highest places)?????

I have problems to trust justice any longer.

After that disaster for the McCanns and yet their win.
Dr. Amaral did not expect that.

A little girl is still missing and the prosecuter stated: there would be a 50/50% chance that she is alive.
BUT it is NOT necessary to investigate her fate....tssssssssss
Can´t help myself...
But imo that is evil and very criminal.

We life in a lost world, I must say.
One indicator: We still lost the fight angainst child-pornography (said the most successful german investigator who dropped his job due desperation)

The Famous Grouse wrote:

lea wrote:sorry off topic but i have had a point deducted,
have i been a bad girl?
anyone know how this has happened,
have i got a foe?

Don't worry Lea, I gave you the point back to balance it out! There seems to be some funny voting going on on that thread, either somebody doesn't quite know how it works, or somebody is playing silly buggers

Or somebody doesn't think the post is good???

I don't think so, Photn; go look at the whole thread for yourself. The votng on there is more bizarre than the Eurovision Song Contest.

What time is the 'press conference' only nothing is being said about it

The Famous Grouse wrote:I don't think so, Photn; go look at the whole thread for yourself. The votng on there is more bizarre than the Eurovision Song Contest.

Hi FG - possibly not only the voting which is a bit peculiar on that thread.

jinvta wrote:Lea, I think somebody gave you a negative point for one of your posts on Freja53's thread because there is a red line on the right of the post. I think if you have a green line on a post it means you have received positive points for that post.

hi jinvta,thanks for reply,i have had a point added again,just after it was deducted,strange.

Photon wrote:The red line just means that someone didn't like your post/think it was a good one. The green lne means the opposite. If someone puts you on their "foe" list it means that your posts don't display to them, so they don't have to read them - and won't, therefore, give you a negative (or positive) mark. I don't know if you can see who has put you on their foes' list?? I presume not.

photopn ,thanks for reply,noone has put me on their foes list and have had my point added,

The Famous Grouse wrote:

lea wrote:sorry off topic but i have had a point deducted,
have i been a bad girl?
anyone know how this has happened,
have i got a foe?

Don't worry Lea, I gave you the point back to balance it out! There seems to be some funny voting going on on that thread, either somebody doesn't quite know how it works, or somebody is playing silly buggers

thanks famous,most kind of you,

Lilemor wrote:How "INDEDPENDENT" IS the ECOHR (freemasons at highest places)?????

I have problems to trust justice any longer.

After that disaster for the McCanns and yet their win.
Dr. Amaral did not expect that.

A little girl is still missing and the prosecuter stated: there would be a 50/50% chance that she is alive.
BUT it is NOT necessary to investigate her fate....tssssssssss
Can´t help myself...
But imo that is evil and very criminal.

We life in a lost world, I must say.
One indicator: We still lost the fight angainst child-pornography (said the most successful german investigator who dropped his job due desperation)

Lilemor,

A rep point from me for a really interesting comment....and because I like Jack Vettriano!